summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/libsyntax/ext
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2014-10-30Test fixes and rebase conflictsAlex Crichton-1/+1
2014-10-30rollup merge of #18445 : alexcrichton/index-mutAlex Crichton-9/+7
Conflicts: src/libcollections/vec.rs
2014-10-30collections: Enable IndexMut for some collectionsAlex Crichton-9/+7
This commit enables implementations of IndexMut for a number of collections, including Vec, RingBuf, SmallIntMap, TrieMap, TreeMap, and HashMap. At the same time this deprecates the `get_mut` methods on vectors in favor of using the indexing notation. cc #18424
2014-10-30Use common variants for open and close delimitersBrendan Zabarauskas-31/+34
This common representation for delimeters should make pattern matching easier. Having a separate `token::DelimToken` enum also allows us to enforce the invariant that the opening and closing delimiters must be the same in `ast::TtDelimited`, removing the need to ensure matched delimiters when working with token trees.
2014-10-29Rename fail! to panic!Steve Klabnik-14/+14
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change]
2014-10-28Move token-to-string functions into print::pprustBrendan Zabarauskas-2/+3
2014-10-28Use an enum rather than a bool in token::IdentBrendan Zabarauskas-2/+7
2014-10-28Convert some token functions into methodsBrendan Zabarauskas-5/+4
2014-10-28Use PascalCase for token variantsBrendan Zabarauskas-133/+133
2014-10-27rollup merge of #18362 : kevinmehall/pprint-struct-pat-shorthandAlex Crichton-1/+1
2014-10-27Preserve struct field pattern shorthand in the prettyprinter.Kevin Mehall-1/+1
Use the `is_shorthand` field introduced by #17813 (ead6c4b) to make the prettyprinter output the shorthand form. Fixes a few places that set `is_shorthand: true` when the pattern is not a PatIdent with the same name as the field.
2014-10-26Add a KleeneOp enum for clarityBrendan Zabarauskas-7/+8
2014-10-26Reduce the size of the TokenTreeBrendan Zabarauskas-6/+15
2014-10-26Use standard capitalisation for TokenTree variantsBrendan Zabarauskas-27/+27
2014-10-26Prevent some vector reallocationsBrendan Zabarauskas-11/+10
2014-10-26Rename TokenTree variants for clarityBrendan Zabarauskas-22/+22
This should be clearer, and fits in better with the `TTNonterminal` variant. Renames: - `TTTok` -> `TTToken` - `TTDelim` -> `TTDelimited` - `TTSeq` -> `TTSequence`
2014-10-26Add Span and separate open/close delims to TTDelimBrendan Zabarauskas-49/+50
This came up when working [on the gl-rs generator extension](https://github.com/bjz/gl-rs/blob/990383de801bd2e233159d5be07c9b5622827620/src/gl_generator/lib.rs#L135-L146). The new definition of `TTDelim` adds an associated `Span` that covers the whole token tree and enforces the invariant that a delimited sequence of token trees must have an opening and closing delimiter. A `get_span` method has also been added to `TokenTree` type to make it easier to implement better error messages for syntax extensions.
2014-10-24Add a lint for not using field pattern shorthandsP1start-4/+7
Closes #17792.
2014-10-19Remove a large amount of deprecated functionalityAlex Crichton-57/+61
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that only old deprecated functionality was removed. This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how to migrate code forward if it still needs migration. [breaking-change]
2014-10-18auto merge of #18099 : jakub-/rust/fixed-issues, r=alexcrichtonbors-1/+1
Closes #9249. Closes #13105. Closes #13837. Closes #13847. Closes #15207. Closes #15261. Closes #16048. Closes #16098. Closes #16256. Closes #16562. Closes #16596. Closes #16709. Closes #16747. Closes #17025. Closes #17121. Closes #17450. Closes #17636.
2014-10-17auto merge of #16855 : P1start/rust/help-messages, r=brsonbors-0/+4
This adds ‘help’ diagnostic messages to rustc. This is used for anything that provides help to the user, particularly the `--explain` messages that were previously integrated into the relevant error message. They look like this: ``` match.rs:10:13: 10:14 error: unreachable pattern [E0001] match.rs:10 1 => {}, ^ match.rs:3:1: 3:38 note: in expansion of foo! match.rs:7:5: 20:2 note: expansion site match.rs:10:13: 10:14 help: pass `--explain E0001` to see a detailed explanation ``` (`help` is coloured cyan.) Adding these errors on a separate line stops the lines from being too long, as discussed in #16619.
2014-10-17Add tests for a few fixed issuesJakub Wieczorek-1/+1
2014-10-16libsyntax: Don't accept :? as a format specifier.Luqman Aden-1/+0
2014-10-16libsyntax: Remove all uses of {:?}.Luqman Aden-7/+7
2014-10-13auto merge of #17733 : jgallagher/rust/while-let, r=alexcrichtonbors-0/+44
This is *heavily* based on `if let` (#17634) by @jakub- and @kballard This should close #17687
2014-10-12Continue cfg syntax transitionSteven Fackler-20/+8
All deprecation warnings have been converted to errors. This includes the warning for multiple cfgs on one item. We'll leave that as an error for some period of time to ensure that all uses are updated before the behavior changes from "or" to "and".
2014-10-10Desugar `while let` into `loop { match { ... } }`John Gallagher-0/+8
2014-10-10Teach libsyntax about `while let`John Gallagher-0/+36
2014-10-09syntax: Tweak the return value of bytes!()Alex Crichton-14/+9
Instead of returning &'static [u8], an invocation of `bytes!()` now returns `&'static [u8, ..N]` where `N` is the length of the byte vector. This should functionally be the same, but there are some cases where an explicit cast may be needed, so this is a: [breaking-change]
2014-10-09rustc: Add `const` globals to the languageAlex Crichton-0/+16
This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old `static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a `const`. The semantics of these three kinds of globals are: * A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well, constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant itself. Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but they should in general not come up too often. * A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`. This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static` concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a future extension not implemented at this time. * A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`. This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is: * Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the matched-on-`static` to a `const`. static FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } change this code to: const FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } * Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other statics by address, however. * Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths. This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead. [breaking-change] [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
2014-10-08auto merge of #17838 : vadimcn/rust/macros, r=alexcrichtonbors-1/+10
2014-10-07Fix the most egregious instances of "local ambiguity: multiple parsing ↵Vadim Chugunov-1/+10
options..." error in macros, which often occurs when trying to match parts of Rust syntax. For example, this matcher: `fn $name:ident( $($param:ident : $pty:ty),* )` would fail when parsing `fn foo()`, because macro parser wouldn't realize that an ident cannot start with `)`. This resolves #5902, and at least partially mitigates #9364 and #3232.
2014-10-06syntax: Parse outer attributes in quote_method!Ben Gamari-7/+2
Fixes #17782.
2014-10-02syntax: ast: remove TyBox and UnBox.Eduard Burtescu-5/+0
2014-10-01auto merge of #17678 : fhahn/rust/issue-17628-infinite-recursion, r=alexcrichtonbors-0/+12
This is a patch for #17628, thanks to @kmcallister for your helpful hints!
2014-10-01Limit recursion depth for macro expansions, closes #17628Florian Hahn-0/+12
2014-10-01auto merge of #17630 : sfackler/rust/cfg-warnings, r=brsonbors-3/+0
Closes #17490
2014-09-30Turn on cfg format warningsSteven Fackler-3/+0
2014-09-30Update after the fall out from the syntax::ptr changesJakub Wieczorek-30/+36
2014-09-30Update based on PR feedbackKevin Ballard-20/+16
2014-09-30Produce a better error for irrefutable `if let` patternsKevin Ballard-2/+2
Modify ast::ExprMatch to include a new value of type ast::MatchSource, making it easy to tell whether the match was written literally or produced via desugaring. This allows us to customize error messages appropriately.
2014-09-30Desugar 'if let' into the appropriate 'match'Kevin Ballard-1/+90
2014-09-29rollup merge of #17592 : kmcallister/inline-asm-locAlex Crichton-1/+12
2014-09-29rollup merge of #17576 : kmcallister/hide-quotesAlex Crichton-49/+51
2014-09-29auto merge of #17409 : farcaller/rust/patch-1, r=huonwbors-2/+6
Parser.parse_method now has a second argument, I assume ast::Inherited is the correct visibility in this case.
2014-09-29Fixed quote_method!() implementationVladimir Pouzanov-2/+6
Parser.parse_method now has a second argument, I assume ast::Inherited is the correct visibility in this case.
2014-09-28Keep ExpnId abstract by providing conversionsKeegan McAllister-1/+1
2014-09-28auto merge of #17527 : sfackler/rust/cfg-syntax, r=alexcrichtonbors-31/+13
We'll need a snapshot before we can convert the codebase over and turn on the deprecation warnings. cc #17490 This is sitting on top of #17506
2014-09-27Convert cfg syntax to new systemSteven Fackler-31/+13
This removes the ability to use `foo(bar)` style cfgs. Switch them to `foo_bar` or `foo="bar"` instead. [breaking-change]
2014-09-27Translate inline assembly errors back to source locationsKeegan McAllister-1/+12
Fixes #17552.