| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Improve suggestion for missing fmt str in println
Avoid using `concat!(fmt, "\n")` to improve the diagnostics being
emitted when the first `println!()` argument isn't a formatting string
literal.
Fix #52347.
|
|
|
|
Avoid using `concat!(fmt, "\n")` to improve the diagnostics being
emitted when the first `println!()` argument isn't a formatting string
literal.
|
|
This commit fixes an issue where multiple custom attributes could not be fed
into a custom derive in some situations with the `use_extern_macros` feature
enabled. The problem was that the macro expander didn't consider that it was
making progress when we were deducing that attributes should be lumped in with
custom derive invocations.
The fix applied here was to track in the expander if our attribute is changing
(getting stashed away elsewhere and replaced with a new invocation). If it is
swapped then it's considered progress, otherwise behavior should remain the
same.
Closes #52525
|
|
Fix macro parser quadratic complexity in small repeating groups
Observed in #51754, and more easily demonstrated with the following:
```rust
macro_rules! stress {
($($t:tt)+) => { };
}
fn main() {
stress!{
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
// ... 65536 copies of "a" total ...
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
}
}
```
which takes 50 seconds to compile prior to the fix and <1s after.
I hope this has a visible impact on the compile times for real code. (I think it is most likely to affect incremental TT munchers that deal with large inputs, though it depends on how they are written)
For a fuller description of the performance issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51754#issuecomment-403242159
---
There is no test (yet) because I'm not sure how easily to measure this for regressions.
|
|
|
|
This commit stabilizes some of the `proc_macro` language feature as well as a
number of APIs in the `proc_macro` crate as [previously discussed][1]. This
means that on stable Rust you can now define custom procedural macros which
operate as attributes attached to items or `macro_rules!`-like bang-style
invocations. This extends the suite of currently stable procedural macros,
custom derives, with custom attributes and custom bang macros.
Note though that despite the stabilization in this commit procedural macros are
still not usable on stable Rust. To stabilize that we'll need to stabilize at
least part of the `use_extern_macros` feature. Currently you can define a
procedural macro attribute but you can't import it to call it!
A summary of the changes made in this PR (as well as the various consequences)
is:
* The `proc_macro` language and library features are now stable.
* Other APIs not stabilized in the `proc_macro` crate are now named under a
different feature, such as `proc_macro_diagnostic` or `proc_macro_span`.
* A few checks in resolution for `proc_macro` being enabled have switched over
to `use_extern_macros` being enabled. This means that code using
`#![feature(proc_macro)]` today will likely need to move to
`#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`.
It's intended that this PR, once landed, will be followed up with an attempt to
stabilize a small slice of `use_extern_macros` just for procedural macros to
make this feature 100% usable on stable.
[1]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/help-stabilize-a-subset-of-macros-2-0/7252
|
|
resolve: Functions introducing procedural macros reserve a slot in the macro namespace as well
Similarly to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52234, this gives us symmetry between internal and external views of a crate, but in this case it's always an error to call a procedural macro in the same crate in which it's defined.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52225
|
|
namespace as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deny bare trait objects in in src/libsyntax
Enforce `#![deny(bare_trait_objects)]` in `src/libsyntax`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a fuller description of the performance issue fixed by this:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51754#issuecomment-403242159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make FileMap::{lines, multibyte_chars, non_narrow_chars} non-mutable.
This PR removes most of the interior mutability from `FileMap`, which should be beneficial, especially in a multithreaded setting. This is achieved by initializing the state in question when the filemap is constructed instead of during lexing. Hopefully this doesn't degrade performance.
cc @wesleywiser
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is gated on edition 2018 & the `async_await` feature gate.
The parser will accept `async fn` and `async unsafe fn` as fn
items. Along the same lines as `const fn`, only `async unsafe fn`
is permitted, not `unsafe async fn`.The parser will not accept
`async` functions as trait methods.
To do a little code clean up, four fields of the function type
struct have been merged into the new `FnHeader` struct: constness,
asyncness, unsafety, and ABI.
Also, a small bug in HIR printing is fixed: it previously printed
`const unsafe fn` as `unsafe const fn`, which is grammatically
incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's so confusing to have everything having the same name, at least while refactoring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revert #49719
This also needs to be backported into beta.
Fixes #51416.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
This reverts commit d6ba1b9b021c408fcad60ee52acf8af5e1b2eb00, reversing
changes made to 8de5353f75dcde04abe947e0560dc5edd861cf3a.
|
|
|
|
generate errors
|
|
add suggestion applicabilities to librustc and libsyntax
A down payment on #50723. Interested in feedback on whether my `MaybeIncorrect` vs. `MachineApplicable` judgement calls are well-calibrated (and that we have a consensus on what this means).
r? @Manishearth
cc @killercup @estebank
|
