summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/libsyntax/feature_gate.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2017-05-27Rollup merge of #42207 - Nashenas88:remove_fragment_info, r=eddybMark Simulacrum-6/+0
Remove all instances of fragment_infos and fragment sets Remove unused fragment structs. This was suggested by @eddyb in IRC: [botbot link](https://botbot.me/mozilla/rustc/2017-05-23/?msg=86016574&page=2).
2017-05-27Auto merge of #42162 - est31:closure-to-fn-coercion, r=aturonbors-6/+2
Stabilize non capturing closure to fn coercion Stabilisation PR for non capturing closure to fn coercion. closes #39817
2017-05-27Stabilize unions with `Copy` fields and no destructorVadim Petrochenkov-6/+0
2017-05-26Auto merge of #42058 - froydnj:thiscall-support, r=nikomatsakisbors-0/+7
add thiscall calling convention support This support is needed for bindgen to work well on 32-bit Windows, and also enables people to begin experimenting with C++ FFI support on that platform. Fixes #42044.
2017-05-25Auto merge of #40847 - jseyfried:decl_macro, r=nrcbors-1/+9
Initial implementation of declarative macros 2.0 Implement declarative macros 2.0 (rust-lang/rfcs#1584) behind `#![feature(decl_macro)]`. Differences from `macro_rules!` include: - new syntax: `macro m(..) { .. }` instead of `macro_rules! m { (..) => { .. } }` - declarative macros are items: ```rust // crate A: pub mod foo { m!(); // use before definition; declaration order is irrelevant pub macro m() {} // `pub`, `pub(super)`, etc. work } fn main() { foo::m!(); // named like other items { use foo::m as n; n!(); } // imported like other items } pub use foo::m; // re-exported like other items // crate B: extern crate A; // no need for `#[macro_use]` A::foo::m!(); A::m!(); ``` - Racket-like hygiene for items, imports, methods, fields, type parameters, privacy, etc. - Intuitively, names in a macro definition are resolved in the macro definition's scope, not the scope in which the macro is used. - This [explaination](http://beautifulracket.com/explainer/hygiene.html) of hygiene for Racket applies here (except for the "Breaking Hygiene" section). I wrote a similar [explanation](https://github.com/jseyfried/rfcs/blob/hygiene/text/0000-hygiene.md) for Rust. - Generally speaking, if `fn f() { <body> }` resolves, `pub macro m() { <body> } ... m!()` also resolves, even if `m!()` is in a separate crate. - `::foo::bar` in a `macro` behaves like `$crate::foo::bar` in a `macro_rules!`, except it can access everything visible from the `macro` (thus more permissive). - See [`src/test/{run-pass, compile-fail}/hygiene`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/40847/commits/afe7d89858fd72b983e24727d6f4058293153c19) for examples. Small example: ```rust mod foo { fn f() { println!("hello world"); } pub macro m() { f(); } } fn main() { foo::m!(); } ``` Limitations: - This does not address planned changes to matchers (`expr`,`ty`, etc.), c.f. #26361. - Lints (including stability and deprecation) and `unsafe` are not hygienic. - adding hygiene here will be mostly or entirely backwards compatible - Nested macro definitions (a `macro` inside another `macro`) don't always work correctly when invoked from external crates. - pending improvements in how we encode macro definitions in crate metadata - There is no way to "escape" hygiene without using a procedural macro. r? @nrc
2017-05-25Remove irrelevant tests and unused testing attributePaul Faria-6/+0
2017-05-25Stabilize non capturing closure to fn coercionest31-6/+2
2017-05-25Declarative macros 2.0 without hygiene.Jeffrey Seyfried-1/+9
2017-05-24add thiscall calling convention supportNathan Froyd-0/+7
This support is needed for bindgen to work well on 32-bit Windows, and also enables people to begin experimenting with C++ FFI support on that platform. Fixes #42044.
2017-05-23Stabilize in 1.19Matthew-38/+31
2017-05-23Rollup merge of #42016 - pietroalbini:stabilize/loop_break_value, r=nikomatsakisCorey Farwell-7/+2
Stabilize the loop_break_value feature Tracking issue: #37339. Documentation PRs already sent to the various repositories.
2017-05-20Auto merge of #42111 - ollie27:stab, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-1/+1
Correct some stability versions These were found by running tidy on stable versions of rust and finding features stabilised with the wrong version numbers.
2017-05-20Correct some stability versionsOliver Middleton-1/+1
These were found by running tidy on stable versions of rust and finding features stabilised with the wrong version numbers.
2017-05-17Stabilize the loop_break_value featurePietro Albini-7/+2
2017-05-15adressed comments by @kennytm and @petrochenkovAndre Bogus-4/+3
2017-05-12Fix some clippy warnings in libsyntaxAndre Bogus-27/+20
This is mostly removing stray ampersands, needless returns and lifetimes.
2017-04-26 support `default impl` for specializationGianni Ciccarelli-7/+4
`[default] [unsafe] impl` and typecheck
2017-04-24support `default impl` for specializationGianni Ciccarelli-1/+10
this commit implements the first step of the `default impl` feature: all items in a `default impl` are (implicitly) `default` and hence specializable. In order to test this feature I've copied all the tests provided for the `default` method implementation (in run-pass/specialization and compile-fail/specialization directories) and moved the `default` keyword from the item to the impl. See referenced issue for further info
2017-04-22Resolve merge conflictmatthewjasper-0/+8
2017-04-21Added feature gate, updated error messages and tests.Cameron Hart-0/+8
2017-04-20Stabilize RFC 1506 - clarified ADT kindsMatthew-25/+3
2017-04-18Add top level sections to the Unstable Book.Corey Farwell-3/+0
Prior to this commit, the contents of the Unstable Book were assumed to be unstable features. This commit moves features into 'language features' or 'library features' subsections. It also moves the 'linker_flavor' compiler flag into a new 'Compiler Flags' subsection. Even though it was helpful, I removed the tidy check that cross-references the SUMMARY.md links with the Unstable Book directory contents just because it would be difficult to maintain. Relevant PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41142.
2017-04-15satisfy completely useless tidy checkAlex Burka-1/+1
2017-04-15feature gate :vis matcherAlex Burka-0/+6
2017-04-14Put overlapping impls behind feature gate, add testsSean Griffin-0/+3
I've added some explicit tests that negative impls are allowed to overlap, and also to make sure that the feature doesn't interfere with specialization. I've not added an explicit test for positive overlapping with negative, as that's already tested elsewhere.
2017-04-12Add global_asm testsA.J. Gardner-1/+1
2017-04-12First attempt at global_asm! macroA.J. Gardner-0/+6
2017-04-10Auto merge of #40018 - japaric:ld, r=alexcrichtonbors-0/+3
-Z linker-flavor (Please read the commit message first) This PR is an alternative to rust-lang/rust#36120 (internal lld linker). The main goal of this PR is to make it *possible* to use LLD as a linker to allow out of tree experimentation. Now that LLD is going to be shipped with LLVM 4.0, it should become easier to get a hold of LLD (hopefully, it will be packaged by Linux distros soon). Since LLD is a multiarch linker, it has the potential to make cross compilation easier (less tools need to be installed). Supposedly, LLD is also faster than the gold linker so LLD may improve build times where link times are significant (e.g. 100% incremental compilation reuse). The place where LLD shines is at linking Rust programs that don't depend on system libraries. For example, here's how you would link a bare metal ARM Cortex-M program: ``` $ xargo rustc --target thumbv7m-none-eabi -- -Z linker-flavor=ld -C linker=ld.lld -Z print-link-args "ld.lld" \ "-L" \ "$XARGO_HOME/lib/rustlib/thumbv7m-none-eabi/lib" \ "$PWD/target/thumbv7m-none-eabi/debug/deps/app-de1f86df314ad68c.0.o" \ "-o" \ "$PWD/target/thumbv7m-none-eabi/debug/deps/app-de1f86df314ad68c" \ "--gc-sections" \ "-L" \ "$PWD/target/thumbv7m-none-eabi/debug/deps" \ "-L" \ "$PWD/target/debug/deps" \ "-L" \ "$XARGO_HOME/lib/rustlib/thumbv7m-none-eabi/lib" \ "-Bstatic" \ "-Bdynamic" \ "$XARGO_HOME/lib/rustlib/thumbv7m-none-eabi/lib/libcore-11670d2bd4951fa7.rlib" $ file target/thumbv7m-none-eabi/debug/app app: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped, with debug_info ``` This doesn't require installing the `arm-none-eabi-gcc` toolchain. Even cooler (but I'm biased) is that you can link Rust programs that use [`steed`] (`steed` is a `std` re-implementation free of C dependencies for Linux systems) instead of `std` for a bunch of different architectures without having to install a single cross toolchain. [`steed`]: https://github.com/japaric/steed ``` $ xargo rustc --target aarch64-unknown-linux-steed --example hello --release -- -Z print-link-args "ld.lld" \ "-L" \ "$XARGO_HOME/lib/rustlib/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed/lib" \ "$PWD/target/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed/release/examples/hello-80c130ad884c0f8f.0.o" \ "-o" \ "$PWD/target/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed/release/examples/hello-80c130ad884c0f8f" \ "--gc-sections" \ "-L" \ "$PWD/target/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed/release/deps" \ "-L" \ "$PWD/target/release/deps" \ "-L" \ "$XARGO_HOME/lib/rustlib/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed/lib" \ "-Bstatic" \ "-Bdynamic" \ "/tmp/rustc.lAybk9Ltx93Q/libcompiler_builtins-589aede02de78434.rlib" $ file target/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed/release/examples/hello hello: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped, with debug_info ``` All these targets (architectures) worked with LLD: - [aarch64-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/aarch64-unknown-linux-steed.json) - [arm-unknown-linux-steedeabi](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/arm-unknown-linux-steedeabi.json) - [arm-unknown-linux-steedeabihf](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/arm-unknown-linux-steedeabihf.json) - [armv7-unknown-linux-steedeabihf](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/armv7-unknown-linux-steedeabihf.json) - [i686-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/i686-unknown-linux-steed.json) - [mips-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/mips-unknown-linux-steed.json) - [mipsel-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/mipsel-unknown-linux-steed.json) - [powerpc-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/powerpc-unknown-linux-steed.json) - [powerpc64-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/powerpc64-unknown-linux-steed.json) - [x86_64-unknown-linux-steed](https://github.com/japaric/steed/blob/lld/docker/x86_64-unknown-linux-steed.json) --- The case where lld is unergonomic is linking binaries that depend on system libraries. Like "Hello, world" for `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. Because you have to pass as linker arguments: the path to the startup objects, the path to the dynamic linker and the library search paths. And all those are system specific so they can't be encoded in the target itself. ``` $ cargo \ rustc \ --release \ -- \ -C \ linker=ld.lld \ -Z \ linker-flavor=ld \ -C \ link-args='-dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.1 /usr/lib/Scrt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.1/crtbeginS.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.3.1/crtendS.o /usr/lib/crtn.o' ``` --- Another case where `-Z linker-flavor` may come in handy is directly calling Solaris' linker which is also a multiarch linker (or so I have heard). cc @binarycrusader cc @alexcrichton Heads up: [breaking-change] due to changes in the target specification format.
2017-04-07pub(restricted) didn't make it into 1.17est31-1/+1
Gets shipped in 1.18 instead.
2017-04-07hack: add a linker_flavor feature gateJorge Aparicio-0/+3
to make tidy accept `-Z linker-flavor` documentation
2017-04-07Auto merge of #39987 - japaric:used, r=arielb1bors-0/+8
#[used] attribute (For an explanation of what this feature does, read the commit message) I'd like to propose landing this as an experimental feature (experimental as in: no clear stabilization path -- like `asm!`, `#[linkage]`) as it's low maintenance (I think) and relevant to the "Usage in resource-constrained environments" exploration area. The main use case I see is running code before `main`. This could be used, for instance, to cheaply initialize an allocator before `main` where the alternative is to use `lazy_static` to initialize the allocator on its first use which it's more expensive (atomics) and doesn't work on ARM Cortex-M0 microcontrollers (no `AtomicUsize` on that platform) Here's a `std` example of that: ``` rust unsafe extern "C" fn before_main_1() { println!("Hello"); } unsafe extern "C" fn before_main_2() { println!("World"); } #[link_section = ".init_arary"] #[used] static INIT_ARRAY: [unsafe extern "C" fn(); 2] = [before_main_1, before_main_2]; fn main() { println!("Goodbye"); } ``` ``` $ rustc -C lto -C opt-level=3 before_main.rs $ ./before_main Hello World Goodbye ``` In general, this pattern could be used to let *dependencies* run code before `main` (which sounds like it could go very wrong in some cases). There are probably other use cases; I hope that the people I have cc-ed can comment on those. Note that I'm personally unsure if the above pattern is something we want to promote / allow and that's why I'm proposing this feature as experimental. If this leads to more footguns than benefits then we can just axe the feature. cc @nikomatsakis ^ I know you have some thoughts on having a process for experimental features though I'm fine with writing an RFC before landing this. - `dead_code` lint will have to be updated to special case `#[used]` symbols. - Should we extend `#[used]` to work on non-generic functions? cc rust-lang/rfcs#1002 cc rust-lang/rfcs#1459 cc @dpc @JinShil
2017-04-05document the implementation a bit moreJorge Aparicio-2/+2
2017-04-05add an #[used] attributeJorge Aparicio-0/+8
similar to GCC's __attribute((used))__. This attribute prevents LLVM from optimizing away a non-exported symbol, within a compilation unit (object file), when there are no references to it. This is better explained with an example: ``` #[used] static LIVE: i32 = 0; static REFERENCED: i32 = 0; static DEAD: i32 = 0; fn internal() {} pub fn exported() -> &'static i32 { &REFERENCED } ``` Without optimizations, LLVM pretty much preserves all the static variables and functions within the compilation unit. ``` $ rustc --crate-type=lib --emit=obj symbols.rs && nm -C symbols.o 0000000000000000 t drop::h1be0f8f27a2ba94a 0000000000000000 r symbols::REFERENCED::hb3bdfd46050bc84c 0000000000000000 r symbols::DEAD::hc2ea8f9bd06f380b 0000000000000000 r symbols::LIVE::h0970cf9889edb56e 0000000000000000 T symbols::exported::h6f096c2b1fc292b2 0000000000000000 t symbols::internal::h0ac1aadbc1e3a494 ``` With optimizations, LLVM will drop dead code. Here `internal` is dropped because it's not a exported function/symbol (i.e. not `pub`lic). `DEAD` is dropped for the same reason. `REFERENCED` is preserved, even though it's not exported, because it's referenced by the `exported` function. Finally, `LIVE` survives because of the `#[used]` attribute even though it's not exported or referenced. ``` $ rustc --crate-type=lib -C opt-level=3 --emit=obj symbols.rs && nm -C symbols.o 0000000000000000 r symbols::REFERENCED::hb3bdfd46050bc84c 0000000000000000 r symbols::LIVE::h0970cf9889edb56e 0000000000000000 T symbols::exported::h6f096c2b1fc292b2 ``` Note that the linker knows nothing about `#[used]` and will drop `LIVE` because no other object references to it. ``` $ echo 'fn main() {}' >> symbols.rs $ rustc symbols.rs && nm -C symbols | grep LIVE ``` At this time, `#[used]` only works on `static` variables.
2017-04-01rustc: Stabilize the `#![windows_subsystem]` attributeAlex Crichton-9/+3
This commit stabilizes the `#![windows_subsystem]` attribute which is a conservative exposure of the `/SUBSYSTEM` linker flag on Widnows platforms. This is useful for creating applications as well as console programs. Closes #37499
2017-03-29Merge `ExpnId` and `SyntaxContext`.Jeffrey Seyfried-13/+7
2017-03-27Fix various useless derefs and slicingsOliver Schneider-5/+4
2017-03-20Rollup merge of #40556 - cramertj:stabilize-pub-restricted, r=petrochenkovCorey Farwell-14/+3
Stabilize pub(restricted) Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32409
2017-03-19Rollup merge of #40441 - tschottdorf:promotable-rfc, r=eddybCorey Farwell-0/+3
Add feature gate for rvalue-static-promotion Probably needs more tests (which ones?) and there may be other things that need to be done. Also not sure whether the version that introduces the flag is really `1.15.1`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1414. Updates #38865.
2017-03-19Auto merge of #40346 - jseyfried:path_and_tokenstream_attr, r=nrcbors-14/+18
`TokenStream`-based attributes, paths in attribute and derive macro invocations This PR - refactors `Attribute` to use `Path` and `TokenStream` instead of `MetaItem`. - supports macro invocation paths for attribute procedural macros. - e.g. `#[::foo::attr_macro] struct S;`, `#[cfg_attr(all(), foo::attr_macro)] struct S;` - supports macro invocation paths for derive procedural macros. - e.g. `#[derive(foo::Bar, super::Baz)] struct S;` - supports arbitrary tokens as arguments to attribute procedural macros. - e.g. `#[foo::attr_macro arbitrary + tokens] struct S;` - supports using arbitrary tokens in "inert attributes" with derive procedural macros. - e.g. `#[derive(Foo)] struct S(#[inert arbitrary + tokens] i32);` where `#[proc_macro_derive(Foo, attributes(inert))]` r? @nrc
2017-03-15Stabilize pub(restricted)Taylor Cramer-14/+3
2017-03-14Add feature toggle for rvalue-static-promotion RFCTobias Schottdorf-0/+3
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1414. Updates #38865.
2017-03-14Liberalize attributes.Jeffrey Seyfried-0/+4
2017-03-14Refactor `Attribute` to use `Path` and `TokenStream` instead of `MetaItem`.Jeffrey Seyfried-14/+14
2017-03-11Add catch expr to AST and disallow catch as a struct nameTaylor Cramer-0/+6
2017-03-04Fix description of closure coercion featureest31-2/+1
2017-03-02Rollup merge of #40129 - abonander:proc_macro_bang, r=jseyfriedCorey Farwell-0/+5
Implement function-like procedural macros ( `#[proc_macro]`) Adds the `#[proc_macro]` attribute, which expects bare functions of the kind `fn(TokenStream) -> TokenStream`, which can be invoked like `my_macro!()`. cc rust-lang/rfcs#1913, #38356 r? @jseyfried cc @nrc
2017-03-02Rollup merge of #40110 - benschreiber:nostackcheck, r=brsonCorey Farwell-7/+19
Made no_stack_check a stable_removed attribute r? @brson
2017-03-02Add support for x86-interrupt calling conventionPhilipp Oppermann-0/+7
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40180 This calling convention can be used for definining interrupt handlers on 32-bit and 64-bit x86 targets. The compiler then uses `iret` instead of `ret` for returning and ensures that all registers are restored to their original values. Usage: ``` extern "x86-interrupt" fn handler(stack_frame: &ExceptionStackFrame) {…} ``` for interrupts and exceptions without error code and ``` extern "x86-interrupt" fn page_fault_handler(stack_frame: &ExceptionStackFrame, error_code: u64) {…} ``` for exceptions that push an error code (e.g., page faults or general protection faults). The programmer must ensure that the correct version is used for each interrupt. For more details see the [LLVM PR][1] and the corresponding [proposal][2]. [1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15567 [2]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045171.html
2017-02-28Implement function-like procedural macros ( `#[proc_macro]`)Austin Bonander-0/+5
2017-02-25removed unneeded comment blocksBen Schreiber-5/+0