| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
|
|
r=pnkfelix
Restrict constants in patterns
This implements [RFC 1445](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1445-restrict-constants-in-patterns.md). The primary change is to limit the types of constants used in patterns to those that *derive* `Eq` (note that implementing `Eq` is not sufficient). This has two main effects:
1. Floating point constants are linted, and will eventually be disallowed. This is because floating point constants do not implement `Eq` but only `PartialEq`. This check replaces the existing special case code that aimed to detect the use of `NaN`.
2. Structs and enums must derive `Eq` to be usable within a match.
This is a [breaking-change]: if you encounter a problem, you are most likely using a constant in an expression where the type of the constant is some struct that does not currently implement
`Eq`. Something like the following:
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
The easiest and most future compatible fix is to annotate the type in question with `#[derive(Eq)]` (note that merely *implementing* `Eq` is not enough, it must be *derived*):
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Another good option is to rewrite the match arm to use an `if` condition (this is also particularly good for floating point types, which implement `PartialEq` but not `Eq`):
```rust
match foo {
c if c == SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Finally, a third alternative is to tag the type with `#[structural_match]`; but this is not recommended, as the attribute is never expected to be stabilized. Please see RFC #1445 for more details.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31434
r? @pnkfelix
|
|
|
|
to careful use of the span from deriving, we
can permit it in stable code if it derives from
deriving (not-even-a-pun intended)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `?` postfix operator is sugar equivalent to the try! macro, but is more amenable to chaining:
`File::open("foo")?.metadata()?.is_dir()`.
`?` is accepted on any *expression* that can return a `Result`, e.g. `x()?`, `y!()?`, `{z}?`,
`(w)?`, etc. And binds more tightly than unary operators, e.g. `!x?` is parsed as `!(x?)`.
cc #31436
|
|
This PR implements [RFC 1192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md), which is triple-dot syntax for inclusive range expressions. The new stuff is behind two feature gates (one for the syntax and one for the std::ops types). This replaces the deprecated functionality in std::iter. Along the way I simplified the desugaring for all ranges.
This is my first contribution to rust which changes more than one character outside of a test or comment, so please review carefully! Some of the individual commit messages have more of my notes. Also thanks for putting up with my dumb questions in #rust-internals.
- For implementing `std::ops::RangeInclusive`, I took @Stebalien's suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1192#issuecomment-137864421. It seemed to me to make the implementation easier and increase type safety. If that stands, the RFC should be amended to avoid confusion.
- I also kind of like @glaebhoerl's [idea](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1254#issuecomment-147815299), which is unified inclusive/exclusive range syntax something like `x>..=y`. We can experiment with this while everything is behind a feature gate.
- There are a couple of FIXMEs left (see the last commit). I didn't know what to do about `RangeArgument` and I haven't added `Index` impls yet. Those should be discussed/finished before merging.
cc @Gankro since you [complained](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xkfro/what_happened_to_inclusive_ranges/cy5j0yq)
cc #27777 #30877 rust-lang/rust#1192 rust-lang/rfcs#1254
relevant to #28237 (tracking issue)
|
|
This commit is the result of the FCPs ending for the 1.8 release cycle for both
the libs and the lang suteams. The full list of changes are:
Stabilized
* `braced_empty_structs`
* `augmented_assignments`
* `str::encode_utf16` - renamed from `utf16_units`
* `str::EncodeUtf16` - renamed from `Utf16Units`
* `Ref::map`
* `RefMut::map`
* `ptr::drop_in_place`
* `time::Instant`
* `time::SystemTime`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::now`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::duration_since` - renamed from `duration_from_earlier`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::elapsed`
* Various `Add`/`Sub` impls for `Time` and `SystemTime`
* `SystemTimeError`
* `SystemTimeError::duration`
* Various impls for `SystemTimeError`
* `UNIX_EPOCH`
* `ops::{Add,Sub,Mul,Div,Rem,BitAnd,BitOr,BitXor,Shl,Shr}Assign`
Deprecated
* Scoped TLS (the `scoped_thread_local!` macro)
* `Ref::filter_map`
* `RefMut::filter_map`
* `RwLockReadGuard::map`
* `RwLockWriteGuard::map`
* `Condvar::wait_timeout_with`
Closes #27714
Closes #27715
Closes #27746
Closes #27748
Closes #27908
Closes #29866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add support to use functions exported using vectorcall.
This essentially only allows to pass a new LLVM calling convention
from rust to LLVM.
```rust
extern "vectorcall" fn abc(param: c_void);
```
references
----
http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/CallingConv_8h_source.html
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn375768.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This transitions the standard library's `thread_local!` macro to use the
freshly-added and gated `#[cfg(target_thread_local)]` attribute. This greatly
simplifies the `#[cfg]` logic in play here, but requires that the standard
library expose both the OS and ELF TLS implementation modules as unstable
implementation details.
The implementation details were shuffled around a bit but end up generally
compiling to the same thing.
Closes #26581 (this supersedes the need for the option)
Closes #27057 (this also starts ignoring the option)
|
|
This change modifies the feature gating of special `#[cfg]` attributes to not
require a `#![feature]` directive in the crate-of-use if the source of the macro
was declared with `#[allow_internal_unstable]`. This enables the standard
library's macro for `thread_local!` to make use of the
`#[cfg(target_thread_local)]` attribute despite it being feature gated (e.g.
it's a hidden implementation detail).
|
|
Currently the standard library has some pretty complicated logic to detect
whether #[thread_local] should be used or whether it's supported. This is also
unfortunately not quite true for OSX where not all versions support
the #[thread_local] attribute (only 10.7+ does). Compiling code for OSX 10.6 is
typically requested via the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET environment variable (e.g.
the linker recognizes this), but the standard library unfortunately does not
respect this.
This commit updates the compiler to add a `target_thread_local` cfg annotation
if the platform being targeted supports the `#[thread_local]` attribute. This is
feature gated for now, and it is only true on non-aarch64 Linux and 10.7+ OSX
(e.g. what the module already does today). Logic has also been added to parse
the deployment target environment variable.
|
|
This PR is a rebase of the original PR by @eddyb https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21836 with some unrebasable parts manually reapplied, feature gate added + type equality restriction added as described below.
This implementation is partial because the type equality restriction is applied to all type ascription expressions and not only those in lvalue contexts. Thus, all difficulties with detection of these contexts and translation of coercions having effect in runtime are avoided.
So, you can't write things with coercions like `let slice = &[1, 2, 3]: &[u8];`. It obviously makes type ascription less useful than it should be, but it's still much more useful than not having type ascription at all.
In particular, things like `let v = something.iter().collect(): Vec<_>;` and `let u = t.into(): U;` work as expected and I'm pretty happy with these improvements alone.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23416
|
|
Some notes:
This patch enforces the rules from [RFC 136](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0136-no-privates-in-public.md) and makes "private in public" a module-level concept and not crate-level. Only `pub` annotations are used by the new algorithm, crate-level exported node set produced by `EmbargoVisitor` is not used. The error messages are tweaked accordingly and don't use the word "exported" to avoid confusing people (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29668).
The old algorithm tried to be extra smart with impls, but it mostly led to unpredictable behavior and bugs like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28325.
The new algorithm tries to be as simple as possible - an impl is considered public iff its type is public and its trait is public (if presents).
A type or trait is considered public if all its components are public, [complications](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/limits-of-type-inference-smartness/2919) with private types leaking to other crates/modules through trait impls and type inference are deliberately ignored so far.
The new algorithm is not recursive and uses the nice new facility `Crate::visit_all_items`!
Obsolete pre-1.0 feature `visible_private_types` is removed.
This is a [breaking-change].
The two main vectors of breakage are type aliases (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28450) and impls (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28325).
I need some statistics from a crater run (cc @alexcrichton) to decide on the breakage mitigation strategy.
UPDATE: All the new errors are reported as warnings controlled by a lint `private_in_public` and lint group `future_incompatible`, but the intent is to make them hard errors eventually.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28325
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28450
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29524
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29627
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29668
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30055
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
Also split out emitters into their own module.
|
|
+ Apply parser changes manually
+ Add feature gate
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit is the standard API stabilization commit for the 1.6 release cycle.
The list of issues and APIs below have all been through their cycle-long FCP and
the libs team decisions are listed below
Stabilized APIs
* `Read::read_exact`
* `ErrorKind::UnexpectedEof` (renamed from `UnexpectedEOF`)
* libcore -- this was a bit of a nuanced stabilization, the crate itself is now
marked as `#[stable]` and the methods appearing via traits for primitives like
`char` and `str` are now also marked as stable. Note that the extension traits
themeselves are marked as unstable as they're imported via the prelude. The
`try!` macro was also moved from the standard library into libcore to have the
same interface. Otherwise the functions all have copied stability from the
standard library now.
* The `#![no_std]` attribute
* `fs::DirBuilder`
* `fs::DirBuilder::new`
* `fs::DirBuilder::recursive`
* `fs::DirBuilder::create`
* `os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt`
* `os::unix::fs::DirBuilderExt::mode`
* `vec::Drain`
* `vec::Vec::drain`
* `string::Drain`
* `string::String::drain`
* `vec_deque::Drain`
* `vec_deque::VecDeque::drain`
* `collections::hash_map::Drain`
* `collections::hash_map::HashMap::drain`
* `collections::hash_set::Drain`
* `collections::hash_set::HashSet::drain`
* `collections::binary_heap::Drain`
* `collections::binary_heap::BinaryHeap::drain`
* `Vec::extend_from_slice` (renamed from `push_all`)
* `Mutex::get_mut`
* `Mutex::into_inner`
* `RwLock::get_mut`
* `RwLock::into_inner`
* `Iterator::min_by_key` (renamed from `min_by`)
* `Iterator::max_by_key` (renamed from `max_by`)
Deprecated APIs
* `ErrorKind::UnexpectedEOF` (renamed to `UnexpectedEof`)
* `OsString::from_bytes`
* `OsStr::to_cstring`
* `OsStr::to_bytes`
* `fs::walk_dir` and `fs::WalkDir`
* `path::Components::peek`
* `slice::bytes::MutableByteVector`
* `slice::bytes::copy_memory`
* `Vec::push_all` (renamed to `extend_from_slice`)
* `Duration::span`
* `IpAddr`
* `SocketAddr::ip`
* `Read::tee`
* `io::Tee`
* `Write::broadcast`
* `io::Broadcast`
* `Iterator::min_by` (renamed to `min_by_key`)
* `Iterator::max_by` (renamed to `max_by_key`)
* `net::lookup_addr`
New APIs (still unstable)
* `<[T]>::sort_by_key` (added to mirror `min_by_key`)
Closes #27585
Closes #27704
Closes #27707
Closes #27710
Closes #27711
Closes #27727
Closes #27740
Closes #27744
Closes #27799
Closes #27801
cc #27801 (doesn't close as `Chars` is still unstable)
Closes #28968
|
|
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/16 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701
- Added syntax support for attributes on expressions and all syntax nodes in statement position.
- Extended `#[cfg]` folder to allow removal of statements, and
of expressions in optional positions like expression lists and trailing
block expressions.
- Extended lint checker to recognize lint levels on expressions and
locals.
- As per RFC, attributes are not yet accepted on `if` expressions.
Examples:
```rust
let x = y;
{
...
}
assert_eq!((1, #[cfg(unset)] 2, 3), (1, 3));
let FOO = 0;
```
Implementation wise, there are a few rough corners and open questions:
- The parser work ended up a bit ugly.
- The pretty printer change was based mostly on guessing.
- Similar to the `if` case, there are some places in the grammar where a new `Expr` node starts,
but where it seemed weird to accept attributes and hence the parser doesn't. This includes:
- const expressions in patterns
- in the middle of an postfix operator chain (that is, after `.`, before indexing, before calls)
- on range expressions, since `#[attr] x .. y` parses as `(#[attr] x) .. y`, which is inconsistent with
`#[attr] .. y` which would parse as `#[attr] (.. y)`
- Attributes are added as additional `Option<Box<Vec<Attribute>>>` fields in expressions and locals.
- Memory impact has not been measured yet.
- A cfg-away trailing expression in a block does not currently promote the previous `StmtExpr` in a block to a new trailing expr. That is to say, this won't work:
```rust
let x = {
#[cfg(foo)]
Foo { data: x }
#[cfg(not(foo))]
Foo { data: y }
};
```
- One-element tuples can have their inner expression removed to become Unit, but just Parenthesis can't. Eg, `(#[cfg(unset)] x,) == ()` but `(#[cfg(unset)] x) == error`. This seemed reasonable to me since tuples and unit are type constructors, but could probably be argued either way.
- Attributes on macro nodes are currently unconditionally dropped during macro expansion, which seemed fine since macro disappear at that point?
- Attributes on `ast::ExprParens` will be prepend-ed to the inner expression in the hir folder.
- The work on pretty printer tests for this did trigger, but not fix errors regarding macros:
- expression `foo![]` prints as `foo!()`
- expression `foo!{}` prints as `foo!()`
- statement `foo![];` prints as `foo!();`
- statement `foo!{};` prints as `foo!();`
- statement `foo!{}` triggers a `None` unwrap ICE.
|
|
This PR allows the constant evaluation of index operations on constant arrays and repeat expressions. This allows index expressions to appear in the expression path of the length expression of a repeat expression or an array type.
An example is
```rust
const ARR: [usize; 5] = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const ARR2: [usize; ARR[1]] = [42, 99];
```
In most other locations llvm's const evaluator figures it out already. This is not specific to index expressions and could be remedied in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tracking issue is #29947
|
|
|
|
This commit adds issue numbers to the vast majority of active feature
gates. The few that are left without issues are rustc/runtime-internal
features that are essentially private APIs.
Closes #28244
r? @huonw
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit adds issue numbers to the vast majority of active feature
gates. The few that are left without issues are rustc/runtime-internal
features that are essentially private APIs.
Closes #28244
|
