| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Tracking issue FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43036#issuecomment-394094318
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/reference/pull/353
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27389
|
|
Stabilize unit tests with non-`()` return type
References #48854
|
|
kennytm:fix-51279-preempt-the-warning-song-and-dance, r=nikomatsakis
Deny #[cfg] and #[cfg_attr] on generic parameters.
Fix #51279.
Attributes on generic parameters are not expanded, meaning `#[cfg]`, `#[cfg_attr]` and attribute proc macros are entirely ignored on them.
This PR makes using the first two attributes an error, because if they are correctly expanded will affect the AST and change code behavior.
I'm beta-nominating this, because generic parameter attributes are stabilizing in 1.27, and if we did not reserve their usage, we may never be able to repurpose the meaning of these attributes in the Rust 2015 edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Point to the current box syntax tracking issue
The issue was used for both box syntax as well as placement new.
It got closed due to placement new being unapproved.
So a new one got created for box syntax, yet neither
the unstable book nor feature_gate.rs got updated.
We are doing this now.
r? @aidanhs
|
|
The issue was used for both box syntax as well as placement new.
It got closed due to placement new being unapproved.
So a new one got created for box syntax, yet neither
the unstable book nor feature_gate.rs got updated.
We are doing this now.
|
|
restore emplacement syntax (obsolete)
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50832
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
Add tests, documentation and attr for feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rustc: Disallow modules and macros in expansions
This commit feature gates generating modules and macro definitions in procedural
macro expansions. Custom derive is exempt from this check as it would be a large
retroactive breaking change (#50587). It's hoped that we can hopefully stem the
bleeding to figure out a better solution here before opening up the floodgates.
The restriction here is specifically targeted at surprising hygiene results [1]
that result in non-"copy/paste" behavior. Hygiene and procedural macros is
intended to be avoided as much as possible for Macros 1.2 by saying everything
is "as if you copy/pasted the code", but modules and macros are sort of weird
exceptions to this rule that aren't fully fleshed out.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50504#issuecomment-387734625
cc #50504
|
|
This commit feature gates generating modules and macro definitions in procedural
macro expansions. Custom derive is exempt from this check as it would be a large
retroactive breaking change (#50587). It's hoped that we can hopefully stem the
bleeding to figure out a better solution here before opening up the floodgates.
The restriction here is specifically targeted at surprising hygiene results [1]
that result in non-"copy/paste" behavior. Hygiene and procedural macros is
intended to be avoided as much as possible for Macros 1.2 by saying everything
is "as if you copy/pasted the code", but modules and macros are sort of weird
exceptions to this rule that aren't fully fleshed out.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50504#issuecomment-387734625
cc #50504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implements RFC 1576.
See: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1576-macros-literal-matcher.md
Changes are mostly in libsyntax, docs, and tests. Feature gate is
enabled for 1.27.0.
Many thanks to Vadim Petrochenkov for following through code reviews
and suggestions.
Example:
````rust
macro_rules! test_literal {
($l:literal) => {
println!("literal: {}", $l);
};
($e:expr) => {
println!("expr: {}", $e);
};
}
fn main() {
let a = 1;
test_literal!(a);
test_literal!(2);
test_literal!(-3);
}
```
Output:
```
expr: 1
literal: 2
literal: -3
```
|
|
This commit fixes a hard error where the `#![feature(rust_2018_preview)]`
feature was forbidden to be mentioned when the `--edition 2018` flag was passed.
This instead silently accepts that feature gate despite it not being necessary.
It's intended that this will help ease the transition into the 2018 edition as
users will, for the time being, start off with the `rust_2018_preview` feature
and no longer immediately need to remove it.
Closes #50662
|
|
NLL isn't quite ready yet so gonna hold off on inserting it into the preview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove unstable `macro_reexport`
It's subsumed by `feature(use_extern_macros)` and `pub use`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35896
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29638
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38951
|
|
Module experiments: Add one more prelude layer for extern crate names passed with `--extern`
Implements one item from https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/the-great-module-adventure-continues/6678/183
When some name is looked up in lexical scope (`name`, i.e. not module-relative scope `some_mod::name` or `::name`), it's searched roughly in the next order:
- local variables
- items in unnamed blocks
- items in the current module
- :sparkles: NEW! :sparkles: crate names passed with `--extern` ("extern prelude")
- standard library prelude (`Vec`, `drop`)
- language prelude (built-in types like `u8`, `str`, etc)
The last two layers contain a limited set of names controlled by us and not arbitrary user-defined names like upper layers. We want to be able to add new names into these two layers without breaking user code, so "extern prelude" names have higher priority than std prelude and built-in types.
This is a one-time breaking change, that's why it would be nice to run this through crater.
Practical impact is expected to be minimal though due to stylistic reasons (there are not many `Uppercase` crates) and due to the way how primitive types are resolved (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32131).
|
|
|
|
It's subsumed by `feature(use_extern_macros)` and `pub use`
|
|
This is in the matter of RFC 1940 and tracking issue #43302.
|
|
Stabilize dyn trait
This PR stabilizes RFC 2113. I followed the [stabilization guide](https://forge.rust-lang.org/stabilization-guide.html).
Related issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweak some warnings around #[target_feature]
This commit fixes up some issues discovered when getting the `stdsimd` crate's CI compiling again.
|
|
don't see issue #0
The unstable-feature attribute requires an issue (neglecting it is
E0547), which gets used in the error messages. Unfortunately, there are
some cases where "0" is apparently used a placeholder where no issue
exists, directing the user to see the (nonexistent) issue #0. (It would
have been better to either let `issue` be optional—compare to how issue
is an `Option<u32>` in the feature-gate declarations in
libsyntax/feature-gate.rs—or actually require that an issue be created.)
Rather than endeavoring to change how `#[unstable]` works at this time
(given competing contributor and reviewer priorities), this simple patch
proposes the less-ambitious solution of just not adding the "(see
issue)" note when the number is zero.
Resolves #49983.
|
|
Feature gate where clauses on associated types
Fixes #49365. Requires crater: these have been usable since 1.24.
|
|
Add specific never search
Fixes #49529.
r? @QuietMisdreavus
|
|
|
