| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
This reverts commit 2d182b82ce5ecfe8090ba3d4e78f1cd72c072ef1.
|
|
This reverts commit c17a1fd7d0ef0f1f546445d0c8bdb11be55e4be7.
|
|
This reverts commit 04c661ba021730bc13d33c6d55cb9aad05026f36.
|
|
This reverts commit 49cbfa1a6f6469ddbc0e88161e52104cc87aea9b.
|
|
This reverts commit 1f470ceac2202ecffe8a15acc1139edb9ad4a03b.
|
|
This reverts commit 2aff6b36d7ed5c25700669a92b4a43200ee0fe6b.
|
|
This reverts commit 665a876e307933c6480a6c55a3e38e88937aff2c.
|
|
This reverts commit 1935ba658c576f14397c2c7a26a6642cf08f26a6.
|
|
This reverts commit 137ded8ab1edf5112c45e0b6854272ae2e9d3a6d.
|
|
This reverts commit e4ed8865786a787a7b0c045f7674569b6be0e9bc.
|
|
This reverts commit 15a6c09b6e8a977f2c6f5a73de01a20d00b37930.
|
|
|
|
Add new EFIAPI ABI
Fixes #54527
Adds a new ABI, "efiapi", which reflects the calling convention as specified by [the current spec UEFI spec](https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI%20Spec%202_7_A%20Sept%206.pdf#G6.999903). When compiling for x86_64, we should select the `win64` ABI, while on all other architectures (Itanium, x86, ARM and ARM64 and RISC-V), we should select the `C` ABI.
Currently, this is done by just turning it into the C ABI everywhere except on x86_64, where it's turned into the win64 ABI. Should we prevent this ABI from being used on unsupported architectures, and if so, how would this be done?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adds a new ABI for the EFIAPI calls. This ABI should reflect the latest
version of the UEFI specification at the time of commit (UEFI spec 2.8,
URL below). The specification says that for x86_64, we should follow the
win64 ABI, while on all other supported platforms (ia32, itanium, arm,
arm64 and risc-v), we should follow the C ABI.
To simplify the implementation, we will simply follow the C ABI on all
platforms except x86_64, even those technically unsupported by the UEFI
specification.
https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/UEFI_Spec_2_8_final.pdf
|
|
This commit stabilizes RFC 2008 (#44109) by removing the feature gate.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
|
|
Adjust the tracking issue for `untagged_unions`.
Makes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55149 the new tracking issue for `untagged_unions`.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32836 which is the old tracking issue.
r? @varkor
|
|
Also elaborate on some feature gates in `active.rs`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Object safe for dispatch
cc #43561
|
|
These are a squashed series of commits.
|
|
Plugins deprecation: don’t suggest simply removing the attribute
Building Servo with a recent Nightly produces:
```rust
warning: use of deprecated attribute `plugin`: compiler plugins are deprecated. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29597
--> components/script/lib.rs:14:1
|
14 | #![plugin(script_plugins)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: remove this attribute
|
= note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default
```
First, linking to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29597 is not ideal since there is pretty much no discussion there of the deprecation and what can be used instead. This PR changes the link to the deprecation PR which does have more discussion.
Second, the “remove this attribute” suggestion is rather unhelpful. Just because a feature is deprecated doesn’t mean that simply removing its use without a replacement is acceptable.
In the case of custom lint, there is no replacement available. Prefixing a message with “help:” when telling users that they’re screwed honestly feels disrespectful.
This PR also changes the message to be more factual.
|
|
Building Servo with a recent Nightly produces:
```rust
warning: use of deprecated attribute `plugin`: compiler plugins are deprecated. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29597
--> components/script/lib.rs:14:1
|
14 | #![plugin(script_plugins)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: remove this attribute
|
= note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default
```
First, linking to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29597 is not ideal
since there is pretty much no discussion there of the deprecation
and what can be used instead.
This PR changes the link to the deprecation PR which does have more discussion.
Second, the “remove this attribute” suggestion is rather unhelpful.
Just because a feature is deprecated doesn’t mean that simply removing its use
without a replacement is acceptable.
In the case of custom lint, there is no replacement available.
Prefixing a message with “help:” when telling users that they’re screwed
honestly feels disrespectful.
This PR also changes the message to be more factual.
|
|
|
|
nnethercote:rm-custom-LocalInternedString-PartialEq-impls, r=petrochenkov
Remove custom `PartialEq` impls for `LocalInternedString`.
This is on-trend with the recent changes simplifying
`LocalInternedString` and reducing its use.
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is on-trend with the recent changes simplifying
`LocalInternedString` and reducing its use.
|
|
Split non-CAS atomic support off into target_has_atomic_load_store
This PR implements my proposed changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32976#issuecomment-518542029 by removing `target_has_atomic = "cas"` and splitting `target_has_atomic` into two separate `cfg`s:
* `target_has_atomic = 8/16/32/64/128`: This indicates the largest width that the target can atomically CAS (which implies support for all atomic operations).
* ` target_has_atomic_load_store = 8/16/32/64/128`: This indicates the largest width that the target can support loading or storing atomically (but may not support CAS).
cc #32976
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
- The attribute is behind a feature gate.
- Error if both #[naked] and #[track_caller] are applied to the same function.
- Error if #[track_caller] is applied to a non-function item.
- Error if ABI is not "rust"
- Error if #[track_caller] is applied to a trait function.
Error codes and descriptions are pending.
|
|
|
|
|