| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Like #43008 (f668999), but _much more aggressive_.
|
|
|
|
Add Span to ast::WhereClause
This PR adds `Span` field to `ast::WhereClause`. The motivation here is to make rustfmt's life easier when recovering comments before and after where clause.
r? @nrc
|
|
This is then later used by `proc_macro` to generate a new
`proc_macro::TokenTree` which preserves span information. Unfortunately this
isn't a bullet-proof approach as it doesn't handle the case when there's still
other attributes on the item, especially inner attributes.
Despite this the intention here is to solve the primary use case for procedural
attributes, attached to functions as outer attributes, likely bare. In this
situation we should be able to now yield a lossless stream of tokens to preserve
span information.
|
|
|
|
This commit adds a new field to the `Item` AST node in libsyntax to optionally
contain the original token stream that the item itself was parsed from. This is
currently `None` everywhere but is intended for use later with procedural
macros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove variant `Token::SubstNt` in favor of `quoted::TokenTree::MetaVar`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this commit implements the first step of the `default impl` feature:
all items in a `default impl` are (implicitly) `default` and hence
specializable.
In order to test this feature I've copied all the tests provided for the
`default` method implementation (in run-pass/specialization and
compile-fail/specialization directories) and moved the `default` keyword
from the item to the impl.
See referenced issue for further info
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a `TyErr` type to represent unknown types in places where
parse errors have happened, while still able to build the AST.
Initially only used to represent incorrectly written fn arguments and
avoid "expected X parameters, found Y" errors when called with the
appropriate amount of parameters. We cannot use `TyInfer` for this as
`_` is not allowed as a valid argument type.
Example output:
```rust
error: expected one of `:` or `@`, found `,`
--> file.rs:12:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y: usize) {}
| ^
error[E0061]: this function takes 2 parameters but 3 parameters were supplied
--> file.rs:19:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y) {}
| --------------- defined here
...
19 | bar(1, 2, 3);
| ^^^^^^^ expected 2 parameters
```
|
|
`TokenStream`-based attributes, paths in attribute and derive macro invocations
This PR
- refactors `Attribute` to use `Path` and `TokenStream` instead of `MetaItem`.
- supports macro invocation paths for attribute procedural macros.
- e.g. `#[::foo::attr_macro] struct S;`, `#[cfg_attr(all(), foo::attr_macro)] struct S;`
- supports macro invocation paths for derive procedural macros.
- e.g. `#[derive(foo::Bar, super::Baz)] struct S;`
- supports arbitrary tokens as arguments to attribute procedural macros.
- e.g. `#[foo::attr_macro arbitrary + tokens] struct S;`
- supports using arbitrary tokens in "inert attributes" with derive procedural macros.
- e.g. `#[derive(Foo)] struct S(#[inert arbitrary + tokens] i32);`
where `#[proc_macro_derive(Foo, attributes(inert))]`
r? @nrc
|
|
Add catch {} to AST
Part of #39849. Builds on #39864.
|
|
|
|
Give spans to individual path segments in AST
And use these spans in path resolution diagnostics.
The spans are spans of identifiers in segments, not whole segments. I'm not sure what spans are more useful in general, but identifier spans are a better fit for resolve errors.
HIR still doesn't have spans.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/38927#discussion_r95336667 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/38890#issuecomment-271731008
r? @nrc @eddyb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`tokenstream::TokenTree::Sequence`.
|
|
exclusive range patterns
adds `..` patterns to the language under a feature gate (`exclusive_range_pattern`).
This allows turning
``` rust
match i {
0...9 => {},
10...19 => {},
20...29 => {},
_ => {}
}
```
into
``` rust
match i {
0..10 => {},
10..20 => {},
20..30 => {},
_ => {}
}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge ObjectSum and PolyTraitRef in AST/HIR + some other refactoring
`ObjectSum` and `PolyTraitRef` are the same thing (list of bounds), they exist separately only due to parser quirks. The second commit merges them.
The first commit replaces `Path` with `Ty` in (not yet supported) equality predicates. They are parsed as types anyway and arbitrary types can always be disguised as paths using aliases, so this doesn't add any new functionality.
The third commit uses `Vec` instead of `P<[T]>` in AST. AST is not immutable like HIR and `Vec`s are more convenient for it, unnecessary conversions are also avoided.
The last commit renames `parse_ty_sum` (which is used for parsing types in general) into `parse_ty`, and renames `parse_ty` (which is used restricted contexts where `+` is not permitted due to operator priorities or other reasons) into `parse_ty_no_plus`.
This is the first part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39085#issuecomment-272743755 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39080 focused on data changes and mechanical renaming, I'll submit a PR with parser changes a bit later.
r? @eddyb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a clearer name since they represent [a, b, c] array literals.
|
|
syntax: enable attributes and cfg on struct fields
This enables conditional compilation of field initializers in a struct literal, simplifying construction of structs whose fields are themselves conditionally present. For example, the intializer for the constant in the following becomes legal, and has the intuitive effect:
```rust
struct Foo {
#[cfg(unix)]
bar: (),
}
const FOO: Foo = Foo {
#[cfg(unix)]
bar: (),
};
```
It's not clear to me whether this calls for the full RFC process, but the implementation was simple enough that I figured I'd begin the conversation with code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix bug in import resolution
Fixes #38535 and fixes #38556.
r? @nrc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This implements RFC 1624, tracking issue #37339.
- `FnCtxt` (in typeck) gets a stack of `LoopCtxt`s, which store the
currently deduced type of that loop, the desired type, and a list of
break expressions currently seen. `loop` loops get a fresh type
variable as their initial type (this logic is stolen from that for
arrays). `while` loops get `()`.
- `break {expr}` looks up the broken loop, and unifies the type of
`expr` with the type of the loop.
- `break` with no expr unifies the loop's type with `()`.
- When building MIR, `loop` loops no longer construct a `()` value at
termination of the loop; rather, the `break` expression assigns the
result of the loop. `while` loops are unchanged.
- `break` respects contexts in which expressions may not end with braced
blocks. That is, `while break { break-value } { while-body }` is
illegal; this preserves backwards compatibility.
- The RFC did not make it clear, but I chose to make `break ()` inside
of a `while` loop illegal, just in case we wanted to do anything with
that design space in the future.
This is my first time dealing with this part of rustc so I'm sure
there's plenty of problems to pick on here ^_^
|
