| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This adds the int_uint feature to *every* library, whether or not it
needs it.
|
|
This gets rid of the 'experimental' level, removes the non-staged_api
case (i.e. stability levels for out-of-tree crates), and lets the
staged_api attributes use 'unstable' and 'deprecated' lints.
This makes the transition period to the full feature staging design
a bit nicer.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/compiletest/compiletest.rs
src/libcollections/lib.rs
src/libserialize/lib.rs
src/libsyntax/feature_gate.rs
|
|
|
|
To avoid using the feauture, change uses of `box <expr>` to
`Box::new(<expr>)` alternative, as noted by the feature gate message.
(Note that box patterns have no analogous trivial replacement, at
least not in general; you need to revise the code to do a partial
match, deref, and then the rest of the match.)
[breaking-change]
|
|
This partially implements the feature staging described in the
[release channel RFC][rc]. It does not yet fully conform to the RFC as
written, but does accomplish its goals sufficiently for the 1.0 alpha
release.
It has three primary user-visible effects:
* On the nightly channel, use of unstable APIs generates a warning.
* On the beta channel, use of unstable APIs generates a warning.
* On the beta channel, use of feature gates generates a warning.
Code that does not trigger these warnings is considered 'stable',
modulo pre-1.0 bugs.
Disabling the warnings for unstable APIs continues to be done in the
existing (i.e. old) style, via `#[allow(...)]`, not that specified in
the RFC. I deem this marginally acceptable since any code that must do
this is not using the stable dialect of Rust.
Use of feature gates is itself gated with the new 'unstable_features'
lint, on nightly set to 'allow', and on beta 'warn'.
The attribute scheme used here corresponds to an older version of the
RFC, with the `#[staged_api]` crate attribute toggling the staging
behavior of the stability attributes, but the user impact is only
in-tree so I'm not concerned about having to make design changes later
(and I may ultimately prefer the scheme here after all, with the
`#[staged_api]` crate attribute).
Since the Rust codebase itself makes use of unstable features the
compiler and build system to a midly elaborate dance to allow it to
bootstrap while disobeying these lints (which would otherwise be
errors because Rust builds with `-D warnings`).
This patch includes one significant hack that causes a
regression. Because the `format_args!` macro emits calls to unstable
APIs it would trigger the lint. I added a hack to the lint to make it
not trigger, but this in turn causes arguments to `println!` not to be
checked for feature gates. I don't presently understand macro
expansion well enough to fix. This is bug #20661.
Closes #16678
[rc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0507-release-channels.md
|
|
This commit performs a pass over the `std::macros` module, applying stability
attributes where necessary. In particular, this audits macros for patterns such
as:
* Standard use of forward-to-format-args via `$($arg:tt)*` (or `+`)
* Prevent macro-defined identifiers from leaking into expression arguments as
hygiene is not perfectly implemented.
* Wherever possible, `$crate` is used now.
Specifically, the following actions were taken:
* The `std::macros` module itself is no longer public.
* The `panic!` macro is stable
* The `assert!` macro is stable
* The `assert_eq!` macro is stable
* The `debug_assert!` macro is stable
* The `debug_assert_eq!` macro is stable
* The `unreachable!` macro is stable after removing the extra forms to bring the
definition in line with the `unimplemented!` macro.
* The `try!` macro is stable
* The `vec!` macro is stable
[breaking-change]
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librbml/lib.rs
src/libserialize/json_stage0.rs
src/libserialize/serialize_stage0.rs
src/libsyntax/ast.rs
src/libsyntax/ext/deriving/generic/mod.rs
src/libsyntax/parse/token.rs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #17103.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/liballoc/lib.rs
src/libcollections/lib.rs
src/libcollections/slice.rs
src/libcore/ops.rs
src/libcore/prelude.rs
src/libcore/ptr.rs
src/librustc/middle/traits/project.rs
src/libstd/c_str.rs
src/libstd/io/mem.rs
src/libstd/io/mod.rs
src/libstd/lib.rs
src/libstd/path/posix.rs
src/libstd/path/windows.rs
src/libstd/prelude.rs
src/libstd/rt/exclusive.rs
src/libsyntax/lib.rs
src/test/compile-fail/issue-18566.rs
src/test/run-pass/deref-mut-on-ref.rs
src/test/run-pass/deref-on-ref.rs
src/test/run-pass/dst-deref-mut.rs
src/test/run-pass/dst-deref.rs
src/test/run-pass/fixup-deref-mut.rs
src/test/run-pass/issue-13264.rs
src/test/run-pass/overloaded-autoderef-indexing.rs
|
|
|
|
because of the backwards compatibility feature gate.)
This is a [breaking-change]. The new rules require that, for an impl of a trait defined
in some other crate, two conditions must hold:
1. Some type must be local.
2. Every type parameter must appear "under" some local type.
Here are some examples that are legal:
```rust
struct MyStruct<T> { ... }
// Here `T` appears "under' `MyStruct`.
impl<T> Clone for MyStruct<T> { }
// Here `T` appears "under' `MyStruct` as well. Note that it also appears
// elsewhere.
impl<T> Iterator<T> for MyStruct<T> { }
```
Here is an illegal example:
```rust
// Here `U` does not appear "under" `MyStruct` or any other local type.
// We call `U` "uncovered".
impl<T,U> Iterator<U> for MyStruct<T> { }
```
There are a couple of ways to rewrite this last example so that it is
legal:
1. In some cases, the uncovered type parameter (here, `U`) should be converted
into an associated type. This is however a non-local change that requires access
to the original trait. Also, associated types are not fully baked.
2. Add `U` as a type parameter of `MyStruct`:
```rust
struct MyStruct<T,U> { ... }
impl<T,U> Iterator<U> for MyStruct<T,U> { }
```
3. Create a newtype wrapper for `U`
```rust
impl<T,U> Iterator<Wrapper<U>> for MyStruct<T,U> { }
```
Because associated types are not fully baked, which in the case of the
`Hash` trait makes adhering to this rule impossible, you can
temporarily disable this rule in your crate by using
`#![feature(old_orphan_check)]`. Note that the `old_orphan_check`
feature will be removed before 1.0 is released.
|
|
This commit completes the deprecation story for the in-tree serialization
library. The compiler will now emit a warning whenever it encounters
`deriving(Encodable)` or `deriving(Decodable)`, and the library itself is now
marked `#[unstable]` for when feature staging is enabled.
All users of serialization can migrate to the `rustc-serialize` crate on
crates.io which provides the exact same interface as the libserialize library
in-tree. The new deriving modes are named `RustcEncodable` and `RustcDecodable`
and require `extern crate "rustc-serialize" as rustc_serialize` at the crate
root in order to expand correctly.
To migrate all crates, add the following to your `Cargo.toml`:
[dependencies]
rustc-serialize = "0.1.1"
And then add the following to your crate root:
extern crate "rustc-serialize" as rustc_serialize;
Finally, rename `Encodable` and `Decodable` deriving modes to `RustcEncodable`
and `RustcDecodable`.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions and licenses are handled by Cargo now, so there's no reason
to keep these attributes around.
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
This will break any uses of macros that assumed () being a valid literal.
|
|
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount
of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that
only old deprecated functionality was removed.
This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking
change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how
to migrate code forward if it still needs migration.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 2288f332301b9e22db2890df256322650a7f3445.
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
If you are using slicing syntax you will need to add #![feature(slicing_syntax)] to your crate.
|
|
This reverts commit 95cfc35607ccf5f02f02de56a35a9ef50fa23a82.
|
|
[breaking-change]
If you are using slicing syntax you will need to add #![feature(slicing_syntax)] to your crate.
|
|
|
|
This extends cfg-gating to attributes.
```rust
#[cfg_attr(<cfg pattern>, <attr>)]
```
will expand to
```rust
#[<attr>]
```
if the `<cfg pattern>` matches the current cfg environment, and nothing
if it does not. The grammar for the cfg pattern has a simple
recursive structure:
* `value` and `key = "value"` are cfg patterns,
* `not(<cfg pattern>)` is a cfg pattern and matches if `<cfg pattern>`
does not.
* `all(<cfg pattern>, ...)` is a cfg pattern and matches if all of the
`<cfg pattern>`s do.
* `any(<cfg pattern>, ...)` is a cfg pattern and matches if any of the
`<cfg pattern>`s do.
Examples:
```rust
// only derive Show for assert_eq! in tests
#[cfg_attr(test, deriving(Show))]
struct Foo { ... }
// only derive Show for assert_eq! in tests and debug builds
#[cfg_attr(any(test, not(ndebug)), deriving(Show))]
struct Foo { ... }
// ignore a test in certain cases
#[test]
#[cfg_attr(all(not(target_os = "linux"), target_endian = "big"), ignore)]
fn test_broken_thing() { ... }
// Avoid duplication when fixing staging issues in rustc
#[cfg_attr(not(stage0), lang="iter")]
pub trait Iterator<T> { ... }
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
declared with the same name in the same scope.
This breaks several common patterns. First are unused imports:
use foo::bar;
use baz::bar;
Change this code to the following:
use baz::bar;
Second, this patch breaks globs that import names that are shadowed by
subsequent imports. For example:
use foo::*; // including `bar`
use baz::bar;
Change this code to remove the glob:
use foo::{boo, quux};
use baz::bar;
Or qualify all uses of `bar`:
use foo::{boo, quux};
use baz;
... baz::bar ...
Finally, this patch breaks code that, at top level, explicitly imports
`std` and doesn't disable the prelude.
extern crate std;
Because the prelude imports `std` implicitly, there is no need to
explicitly import it; just remove such directives.
The old behavior can be opted into via the `import_shadowing` feature
gate. Use of this feature gate is discouraged.
This implements RFC #116.
Closes #16464.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Implements RFC #168.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #15544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #8142.
This is not the semantics we want long-term. You can continue to use
`#[unsafe_destructor]`, but you'll need to add
`#![feature(unsafe_destructor)]` to the crate attributes.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
