| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
proc_macro::Group::span_open and span_close
Before this addition, every delimited group like `(`...`)` `[`...`]` `{`...`}` has only a single Span that covers the full source location from opening delimiter to closing delimiter. This makes it impossible for a procedural macro to trigger an error pointing to just the opening or closing delimiter. The Rust compiler does not seem to have the same limitation:
```rust
mod m {
type T =
}
```
```console
error: expected type, found `}`
--> src/main.rs:3:1
|
3 | }
| ^
```
On that same input, a procedural macro would be forced to trigger the error on the last token inside the block, on the entire block, or on the next token after the block, none of which is really what you want for an error like above.
This commit adds `group.span_open()` and `group.span_close()` which access the Span associated with just the opening delimiter and just the closing delimiter of the group. Relevant to Syn as we implement real error messages for when parsing fails in a procedural macro: https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/issues/476.
```diff
impl Group {
fn span(&self) -> Span;
+ fn span_open(&self) -> Span;
+ fn span_close(&self) -> Span;
}
```
Fixes #48187
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
* When encountering EOF, point at the last opening brace that does not
have the same indentation level as its close delimiter.
* When encountering the wrong type of close delimiter, point at the
likely correct open delimiter to give a better idea of what went
wrong.
|
|
|
|
Tweak unclosed delimiter parser error
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit fixes `StringReader`'s parsing of tokens which have been stringified
through procedural macros. Whether or not a token tree is joint is defined by
span information, but when working with procedural macros these spans are often
dummy and/or overridden which means that they end up considering all operators
joint if they can!
The fix here is to track the raw source span as opposed to the overridden span.
With this information we can more accurately classify `Punct` structs as either
joint or not.
Closes #50700
|
|
|
|
Like #43008 (f668999), but _much more aggressive_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
