| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
statements:
```rust
macro_rules! m { () => { let x = 1; x } }
macro_rules! n { () => {
m!() //< This can now expand into statements
}}
fn main() { n!(); }
```
and revert needless fallout fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parser: Remove outdated checks for empty braced struct expressions (`S {}`)
This is a pure refactoring.
r? @nrc
|
|
Fix expansion performance regression
**syntax-[breaking-change] cc #31645**
This fixes #34630 by reverting commit 5bf7970 of PR #33943, which landed in #34424.
By removing the `Rc<_>` wrapping around `Delimited` and `SequenceRepetition` in `TokenTree`, 5bf7970 made cloning `TokenTree`s more expensive. While this had no measurable performance impact on the compiler's crates, it caused an order of magnitude performance regression on some macro-heavy code in the wild. I believe this is due to clones of `TokenTree`s in `macro_parser.rs` and/or `macro_rules.rs`.
r? @nrc
|
|
{}`).
|
|
Support `cfg_attr` on `path` attributes
Fixes #25544.
This is technically a [breaking-change]. For example, the following would break:
```rust
mod foo; // Suppose `foo.rs` existed in the appropriate location
```
|
|
Identify when documetation comments have been missplaced in the
following places:
* After a struct element:
```rust
// file.rs:
struct X {
a: u8 /** document a */,
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:2:11: 2:28 error: found documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:2 a: u8 /** document a */,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:2:11: 2:28 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
* As the last line of a struct:
```rust
// file.rs:
struct X {
a: u8,
/// incorrect documentation
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 error: found a documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:3 /// incorrect documentation
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
* As the last line of a `fn`:
```rust
// file.rs:
fn main() {
let x = 1;
/// incorrect documentation
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 error: found a documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:3 /// incorrect documentation
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
Fix #27429, #30322
|
|
(instead of by reference)"
This reverts commit 5bf7970ac70b4e7781e7b2f3816720aa62fac6fd.
|
|
This is a spiritual succesor to #34268/8531d581, in which we replaced a
number of matches of None to the unit value with `if let` conditionals
where it was judged that this made for clearer/simpler code (as would be
recommended by Manishearth/rust-clippy's `single_match` lint). The same
rationale applies to matches of None to the empty block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To allow these braced macro invocation, this PR removes the optional expression from `ast::Block` and instead uses a `StmtKind::Expr` at the end of the statement list.
Currently, braced macro invocations in blocks can expand into statements (and items) except when they are last in a block, in which case they can only expand into expressions.
For example,
```rust
macro_rules! make_stmt {
() => { let x = 0; }
}
fn f() {
make_stmt! {} //< This is OK...
let x = 0; //< ... unless this line is commented out.
}
```
Fixes #34418.
|
|
Generalize and abstract `ThinAttributes` to `ThinVec<Attribute>`.
|
|
Refactor away `ast::Decl`, refactor `ast::Stmt`, and rename `ast::ExprKind::Again` to `ast::ExprKind::Continue`.
|
|
Miscellaneous low priority cleanup in `libsyntax`.
|
|
syntax-[breaking-change] cc #31645
(Only breaking because ast::TokenTree is now tokenstream::TokenTree.)
This pull request refactors TokenTrees into their own file as src/libsyntax/tokenstream.rs, moving them out of src/libsyntax/ast.rs, in order to prepare for an accompanying TokenStream implementation (per RFC 1566).
|
|
This PR refactors the 'errors' part of libsyntax into its own crate (librustc_errors). This is the first part of a few refactorings to simplify error reporting and potentially support more output formats (like a standardized JSON output and possibly an --explain mode that can work with the user's code), though this PR stands on its own and doesn't assume further changes.
As part of separating out the errors crate, I have also refactored the code position portion of codemap into its own crate (libsyntax_pos). While it's helpful to have the common code positions in a separate crate for the new errors crate, this may also enable further simplifications in the future.
|
|
The AST part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/34365
plugin-[breaking-change] cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31645
|
|
**syntax-[breaking-change]** cc #31645
New `TraitItemKind::Macro` variant
This change adds support for macro expansion inside trait items by adding the new `TraitItemKind::Macro` and associated parsing code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified tests to point to the new file now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casual grepping revealed some places in the codebase (some of which
antedated `if let`'s December 2014 stabilization in c200ae5a) where we
were using a match with a `None => ()` arm where (in the present
author's opinion) an `if let` conditional would be more readable. (Other
places where matching to the unit value did seem to better express the
intent were left alone.)
It's likely that we don't care about making such trivial,
non-functional, sheerly æsthetic changes.
But if we do, this is a patch.
|
|
reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
- Successful merges: #33753, #33815, #33829, #33858, #33865, #33866, #33870, #33874, #33891, #33898
- Failed merges:
|
|
The AST part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33505.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33505 isn't landed yet, so this PR is based on top of it.
r? @nrc
plugin-[breaking-change] cc #31645 @Manishearth
|
|
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33627
r? @nikomatsakis
plugin-[breaking-change] cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31645 @Manishearth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes the "shadowing labels" warning *not* print the entire loop
as a span, but only the lifetime.
Also makes #31719 go away, but does not fix its root cause (the span
of the expanded loop is still wonky, but not used anymore).
|
|
Fix spans and expected token lists, fix #33413 + other cosmetic improvements
Add test for #33413
Convert between `Arg` and `ExplicitSelf` precisely
Simplify pretty-printing for methods
|
|
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns
The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is:
```
self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?;
```
So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`".
Fixes: #27361
|
|
parser: fix suppression of syntax errors in range RHS
Invalid expressions on the RHS were just swallowed without generating an error. The new version more closely mirrors the code for parsing `..x` in the `parse_prefix_range_expr` method below, where no cancel is done either.
Fixes #33262.
|
|
parser: change warning into an error on `T<A=B, C>`
part of #32214
This seems to be the obvious fix, and the error message is consistent with all the other parser errors ("expected x, found y").
|
|
The extra filename and line was mainly there to keep the indentation
relative to the main snippet; now that this doesn't include
filename/line-number as a prefix, it is distracted.
|
|
Fixes: #32214
|
|
The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the
first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is:
`self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?;`
So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or
`unsafe`, found `unsafe`".
Fixes: #27361
|
