| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
This breaks all implementors of FromIterator, as they must now accept IntoIterator instead of Iterator. The fix for this is generally trivial (change the bound, and maybe call into_iter() on the argument to get the old argument).
Users of FromIterator should be unaffected because Iterators are IntoIterator.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This breaks all implementors of Extend, as they must now accept IntoIterator instead of Iterator. The fix for this is generally trivial (change the bound, and maybe call into_iter() on the argument to get the old argument).
Users of Extend should be unaffected because Iterators are IntoIterator.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
mk/tests.mk
src/liballoc/arc.rs
src/liballoc/boxed.rs
src/liballoc/rc.rs
src/libcollections/bit.rs
src/libcollections/btree/map.rs
src/libcollections/btree/set.rs
src/libcollections/dlist.rs
src/libcollections/ring_buf.rs
src/libcollections/slice.rs
src/libcollections/str.rs
src/libcollections/string.rs
src/libcollections/vec.rs
src/libcollections/vec_map.rs
src/libcore/any.rs
src/libcore/array.rs
src/libcore/borrow.rs
src/libcore/error.rs
src/libcore/fmt/mod.rs
src/libcore/iter.rs
src/libcore/marker.rs
src/libcore/ops.rs
src/libcore/result.rs
src/libcore/slice.rs
src/libcore/str/mod.rs
src/libregex/lib.rs
src/libregex/re.rs
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/libstd/collections/hash/map.rs
src/libstd/collections/hash/set.rs
src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs
src/libstd/sync/mutex.rs
src/libstd/sync/poison.rs
src/libstd/sync/rwlock.rs
src/libsyntax/feature_gate.rs
src/libsyntax/test.rs
|
|
stable/unstable
Conflicts:
src/libcore/atomic.rs
src/libcore/finally.rs
src/test/auxiliary/inherited_stability.rs
src/test/auxiliary/lint_stability.rs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 503][rfc] which is a stabilization
story for the prelude. Most of the RFC was directly applied, removing reexports.
Some reexports are kept around, however:
* `range` remains until range syntax has landed to reduce churn.
* `Path` and `GenericPath` remain until path reform lands. This is done to
prevent many imports of `GenericPath` which will soon be removed.
* All `io` traits remain until I/O reform lands so imports can be rewritten all
at once to `std::io::prelude::*`.
This is a breaking change because many prelude reexports have been removed, and
the RFC can be consulted for the exact list of removed reexports, as well as to
find the locations of where to import them.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0503-prelude-stabilization.md
[breaking-change]
Closes #20068
|
|
libcore: slice::Items -> slice::Iter, slice::MutItems -> slice::IterMut
libcollections: *::Items -> *::Iter, *::MoveItems -> *::IntoIter, *::MutItems -> *::IterMut
This is of course a [breaking-change].
|
|
|
|
|
|
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as
their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to
refer to the new locations:
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
=>
```
pub use self::Foo::{A, B};
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
or
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = Foo::A;
}
```
[breaking-change]
|
|
In order to upgrade, simply rename the Extendable trait to Extend in
your code
Part of #18424
[breaking-change]
|
|
As part of the collections reform RFC, this commit removes all collections
traits in favor of inherent methods on collections themselves. All methods
should continue to be available on all collections.
This is a breaking change with all of the collections traits being removed and
no longer being in the prelude. In order to update old code you should move the
trait implementations to inherent implementations directly on the type itself.
Note that some traits had default methods which will also need to be implemented
to maintain backwards compatibility.
[breaking-change]
cc #18424
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221
The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.
Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.
We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.
To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:
grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'
You can of course also do this by hand.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount
of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that
only old deprecated functionality was removed.
This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking
change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how
to migrate code forward if it still needs migration.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
1. The internal layout for traits has changed from (vtable, data) to (data, vtable). If you were relying on this in unsafe transmutes, you might get some very weird and apparently unrelated errors. You should not be doing this! Prefer not to do this at all, but if you must, you should use raw::TraitObject rather than hardcoding rustc's internal representation into your code.
2. The minimal type of reference-to-vec-literals (e.g., `&[1, 2, 3]`) is now a fixed size vec (e.g., `&[int, ..3]`) where it used to be an unsized vec (e.g., `&[int]`). If you want the unszied type, you must explicitly give the type (e.g., `let x: &[_] = &[1, 2, 3]`). Note in particular where multiple blocks must have the same type (e.g., if and else clauses, vec elements), the compiler will not coerce to the unsized type without a hint. E.g., `[&[1], &[1, 2]]` used to be a valid expression of type '[&[int]]'. It no longer type checks since the first element now has type `&[int, ..1]` and the second has type &[int, ..2]` which are incompatible.
3. The type of blocks (including functions) must be coercible to the expected type (used to be a subtype). Mostly this makes things more flexible and not less (in particular, in the case of coercing function bodies to the return type). However, in some rare cases, this is less flexible. TBH, I'm not exactly sure of the exact effects. I think the change causes us to resolve inferred type variables slightly earlier which might make us slightly more restrictive. Possibly it only affects blocks with unreachable code. E.g., `if ... { fail!(); "Hello" }` used to type check, it no longer does. The fix is to add a semicolon after the string.
|
|
floating point numbers for real.
This will break code that looks like:
let mut x = 0;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Change that code to:
let mut x = 0i;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Closes #15201.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are:
* `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`;
* `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`;
* `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`.
RFC #30. Closes #6023.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Also renames the `Container` trait to `Collection`.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
This replaces all uses of private enum variants with a struct that has
one private field pointing at a private enum.
RFC: 0006-remove-priv
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
It's now in the prelude.
|
|
Closes #12771
|
|
Fixes a regression from #4913 which causes items to be exanded with spans lacking expn_info from the context's current backtrace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparatory work for removing unique vectors from the language, which is
itself preparatory work for dynamically sized types.
|
|
Now that fold_item can return multiple items, this is pretty trivial. It
also recursively expands generated items so ItemDecorators can generate
items that are tagged with ItemDecorators!
Closes #4913
|
|
Also move Void to std::any, move drop to std::mem and reexport in
prelude.
|
|
Error messages cleaned in librustc/middle
Error messages cleaned in libsyntax
Error messages cleaned in libsyntax more agressively
Error messages cleaned in librustc more aggressively
Fixed affected tests
Fixed other failing tests
Last failing tests fixed
|
|
Rename existing iterators to get rid of the Iterator suffix and to
give them names that better describe the things being iterated over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #4375
|
|
|
