| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR #24242 added the ability to the compiler to directly give suggestions about
how to modify code to fix an error. The new errors look like this:
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:25 error: expected a path on the left-hand side of `+`,
not `&'static Copy` [E0178]
foobar.rs:5 let x: &'static Copy + 'static;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:35 help: try adding parentheses (per RFC 438):
foobar.rs: let x: &'static (Copy + 'static);
foobar.rs:2:13: 2:23 error: cast to unsized type: `&_` as `core::marker::Copy`
foobar.rs:2 let x = &1 as Copy;
^~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:2:19: 2:23 help: try casting to a reference instead:
foobar.rs: let x = &1 as &Copy;
foobar.rs:7:24: 7:25 error: expected expression, found `;`
foobar.rs:7 let x = box (1 + 1);
^
foobar.rs:7:13: 7:16 help: try using `box()` instead:
foobar.rs: let x = box() (1 + 1);
This also modifies compiletest to give the ability to directly test suggestions
given by error messages.
|
|
I did a manual merge of all the extended error PRs as we were getting merge conflicts yesterday. I think this is preferable to merging separately as I ended up having to manually merge @nham and @GuillaumeGomez's commits.
Rollup of #24458, #24482 and #24488.
#24482 and #24488 were already re-approved, and would need to be cancelled if this is merged instead.
|
|
This patch
1. renames libunicode to librustc_unicode,
2. deprecates several pieces of libunicode (see below), and
3. removes references to deprecated functions from
librustc_driver and libsyntax. This may change pretty-printed
output from these modules in cases involving wide or combining
characters used in filenames, identifiers, etc.
The following functions are marked deprecated:
1. char.width() and str.width():
--> use unicode-width crate
2. str.graphemes() and str.grapheme_indices():
--> use unicode-segmentation crate
3. str.nfd_chars(), str.nfkd_chars(), str.nfc_chars(), str.nfkc_chars(),
char.compose(), char.decompose_canonical(), char.decompose_compatible(),
char.canonical_combining_class():
--> use unicode-normalization crate
|
|
This extracts some of the minor cleanup patches from #23905.
|
|
Implement `Debug`, `Display` and `Error` for `FatalError` and `ExplicitBug`
|
|
This is the second attempt at turning the trace_macros macro into a compiler flag.
See #22619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch
1. renames libunicode to librustc_unicode,
2. deprecates several pieces of libunicode (see below), and
3. removes references to deprecated functions from
librustc_driver and libsyntax. This may change pretty-printed
output from these modules in cases involving wide or combining
characters used in filenames, identifiers, etc.
The following functions are marked deprecated:
1. char.width() and str.width():
--> use unicode-width crate
2. str.graphemes() and str.grapheme_indices():
--> use unicode-segmentation crate
3. str.nfd_chars(), str.nfkd_chars(), str.nfc_chars(), str.nfkc_chars(),
char.compose(), char.decompose_canonical(), char.decompose_compatible(),
char.canonical_combining_class():
--> use unicode-normalization crate
|
|
This is a little bit tricky, since with include_str!, we know that we
are including utf-8 content, so it's safe to store the source as a
String in a FileMap. We don't know that for include_bytes!, but I don't
think we actually need to track the contents anyways, so I'm passing "".
new_filemap does check for the zero length content, and it should be
reasonable, howeven I'm not sure if it would be better to pass None
instead of Some(Rc::new("")) as the src component of a FileMap.
Fixes bug #24348
|
|
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
This allows #[derive(...)]` to create more than one impl
|
|
|
|
It was an oversight that this was not done in the great int upheaval.
[breaking-change]
|
|
It was an oversight that this was not done in the great int upheaval.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement `Debug`, `Display` and `Error` for `FatalError` and `ExplicitBug`
|
|
`s/([^\(\s]+\.)len\(\) [(?:!=)>] 0/!$1is_empty()/g`
|
|
`s/(?<!\{ self)(?<=\.)len\(\) == 0/is_empty()/g`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just some minor patches I've been sitting on.
|
|
This is a little bit tricky, since with include_str!, we know that we
are including utf-8 content, so it's safe to store the source as a
String in a FileMap. We don't know that for include_bytes!, but I don't
think we actually need to track the contents anyways, so I'm passing "".
new_filemap does check for the zero length content, and it should be
reasonable, howeven I'm not sure if it would be better to pass None
instead of Some(Rc::new("")) as the src component of a FileMap.
Fixes bug #24348
|
|
|
|
This commit entirely removes the old I/O, path, and rand modules. All
functionality has been deprecated and unstable for quite some time now!
|
|
Fixes #22953.
|
|
Fixes #22619
|
|
As i proposed in #24262 (and found acceptance in the IRC channel), added a compiler warning for wrong escaping of curly braces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a format string if a wrongly escaped one is detected in a string.
|
|
There are syntax extensions that call `std::rt::begin_unwind` passing it a `usize`. I updated the syntax extension to instead pass `u32`, but for bootstrapping reasons, I needed to create a `#[cfg(stage0)]` version of `std::rt::begin_unwind` and therefore also `panic!`.
|
|
`format_args!` uses `#[allow_internal_unstable]` to access internal
functions and structs that are marked unstable. For this to work, the
spans on AST nodes referencing unstable internals must be equal (same
lo/hi values) to the `format_args!` call site, so that the stability
checker can recognize that the AST node was generated by the macro.
|
|
|
|
* In `noop_fold_expr`, call `new_span` in these cases:
- `ExprMethodCall`'s identifier
- `ExprField`'s identifier
- `ExprTupField`'s integer
Calling `new_span` for `ExprMethodCall`'s identifier is necessary to print
an acceptable diagnostic for `write!(&2, "")`. We see this error:
```
<std macros>:2:20: 2:66 error: type `&mut _` does not implement any method in scope named `write_fmt`
<std macros>:2 ( & mut * $ dst ) . write_fmt ( format_args ! ( $ ( $ arg ) * ) ) )
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
With this change, we also see a macro expansion backtrace leading to
the `write!(&2, "")` call site.
* After fully expanding a macro, we replace the expansion expression's
span with the original span. Call `fld.new_span` to add a backtrace to
this span. (Note that I'm call `new_span` after `bt.pop()`, so the macro
just expanded isn't on the backtrace.)
The motivating example for this change is `println!("{}")`. The format
string literal is `concat!($fmt, "arg")` and is inside the libstd macro.
We need to see the backtrace to find the `println!` call site.
* Add a backtrace to the `format_args!` format expression span.
r? alexcrichton
Addresses #23459
|
|
|
|
We provide tools to tell what exact symbols to emit for any fn or static, but
don’t quite check if that won’t cause any issues later on. Some of the issues
include LLVM mangling our names again and our names pointing to wrong locations,
us generating dumb foreign call wrappers, linker errors, extern functions
resolving to different symbols altogether (`extern {fn fail();} fail();` in some
cases calling `fail1()`), etc.
Before the commit we had a function called `note_unique_llvm_symbol`, so it is
clear somebody was aware of the issue at some point, but the function was barely
used, mostly in irrelevant locations.
Along with working on it I took liberty to start refactoring trans/base into
a few smaller modules. The refactoring is incomplete and I hope I will find some
motivation to carry on with it.
This is possibly a [breaking-change] because it makes dumbly written code
properly invalid.
This fixes all those issues about incorrect use of #[no_mangle] being not reported/misreported/ICEd by the compiler.
NB. This PR does not attempt to tackle the parallel codegen issue that was mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/22811, but I believe it should be very straightforward in a follow up PR by modifying `trans::declare::get_defined_value` to look at all the contexts.
cc @alexcrichton @huonw @nrc because you commented on the original RFC issue.
EDIT: wow, this became much bigger than I initially intended.
|
