| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Many people will be very confused that their debug! statements aren't working
when they first use rust only to learn that they should have been building with
`--cfg debug` the entire time. This inverts the meaning of the flag to instead
of enabling debug statements, now it disables debug statements.
This way the default behavior is a bit more reasonable, and requires less
end-user configuration. Furthermore, this turns on debug by default when
building the rustc compiler.
|
|
Previously, the lexer calling `rdr.fatal(...)` would report the span of
the last complete token, instead of a span within the erroneous token
(besides one span fixed in 1ac90bb).
This branch adds wrappers around `rdr.fatal(...)` that sets the span
explicilty, so that all fatal errors in `libsyntax/parse/lexer.rs` now
report the offending code more precisely. A number of tests try to
verify that, though the `compile-fail` testing setup can only check that
the spans are on the right lines, and the "unterminated string/block
comment" errors can't have the line marked at all, so that's incomplete.
This closes #9149.
Also, the lexer errors now report the offending code in the error message,
not just via the span, just like other errors do.
|
|
|
|
`Some(5).or_{default,zero}` can be easily replaced with `Some(Some(5).unwrap_or_default())`.
|
|
... instead of giving their numeric codepoint, following the lead of
fdaae34. So the error message for, say, '\_' mentions _ instead of 95,
and '\●' now mentions \u25cf.
|
|
Previously, the lexer calling `rdr.fatal(...)` would report the span of
the last complete token, instead of a span within the erroneous token
(besides one span fixed in 1ac90bb).
This commit adds a wrapper around `rdr.fatal(...)` that sets the span
explicilty, so that all fatal errors in `libsyntax/parse/lexer.rs` now
report the offending code more precisely. A number of tests try to
verify that, though the `compile-fail` testing setup can only check that
the spans are on the right lines, and the "unterminated string/block
comment" errors can't have the line marked at all, so that's incomplete.
Closes #9149.
|
|
This is more consistent with other parts of the language and it also makes it
easier to use in situations where format string is massive.
|
|
This is my first contribution, so please point out anything that I may have missed.
I consulted IRC and settled on `match () { ... }` for most of the replacements.
|
|
This is more consistent with other parts of the language and it also makes it
easier to use in situations where format string is massive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since 3b6314c the pretty printer seems to only print trait bounds for `ast::ty_path(...)`s that have a generics arguments list. That seems wrong, so let's always print them.
Closes #9253, un-xfails test for #7673.
|
|
|
|
This commit adds support for `\0` escapes in character and string literals.
Since `\0` is equivalent to `\x00`, this is a direct translation to the latter
escape sequence. Future builds will be able to compile using `\0` directly.
Also updated the grammar specification and added a test for NUL characters.
|
|
Since 3b6314c3 the pretty printer seems to only print trait bounds for
`ast::ty_path(...)`s that have a generics arguments list. That seems
wrong, so let's always print them.
Closes #9253, un-xfails test for #7673.
|
|
|
|
This constrains the span to the appropriate argument, so you know which
one caused the problem. Instead of
foo.rs:2:4: 2:21 error: Too large integer literal in bytes!
foo.rs:2 bytes!(1, 256, 2)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
it will say
foo.rs:2:14 2:17 error: Too large integer literal in bytes!
foo.rs:2 bytes!(1, 256, 2)
^~~
|
|
This doesn't close any bugs as the goal is to convert the parameter to by-value, but this is a step towards being able to make guarantees about `&T` pointers (where T is Freeze) to LLVM.
|
|
|
|
This constrains the span to the appropriate argument, so you know which
one caused the problem. Instead of
foo.rs:2:4: 2:21 error: Too large integer literal in bytes!
foo.rs:2 bytes!(1, 256, 2)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
it will say
foo.rs:2:14 2:17 error: Too large integer literal in bytes!
foo.rs:2 bytes!(1, 256, 2)
^~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't seem to be using `SimpleVisitor` anywhere in rustc. Is there any reason to keep it around?
r? anyone
|
|
This pull request finally adds support for recursive type definitions and provides a stub implementation for object pointers.
|
|
Remove these in favor of the two traits themselves and the wrapper
function std::from_str::from_str.
Add the function std::num::from_str_radix in the corresponding role for
the FromStrRadix trait.
|
|
|
|
The same fix as before is still relevant, I just forgot to update the
expand_stmt macro expansion site. The tests for format!() suffice as tests for
this change.
|
|
This renames the syntax-extension file to format from ifmt, and it also reduces
the amount of complexity inside by defining all other macros in terms of
format_args!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #5794
|
|
r=alexcrichton
I'm getting the three `make check` failures mentioned in issue #9127, which I also get building master.
|
|
Work a bit towards #9157 "Remove Either". These instances don't need to use Either and are better expressed in other ways (removing allocations and simplifying types).
|
|
This is a series of patches to modernize option and result. The highlights are:
* rename `.unwrap_or_default(value)` and etc to `.unwrap_or(value)`
* add `.unwrap_or_default()` that uses the `Default` trait
* add `Default` implementations for vecs, HashMap, Option
* add `Option.and(T) -> Option<T>`, `Option.and_then(&fn() -> Option<T>) -> Option<T>`, `Option.or(T) -> Option<T>`, and `Option.or_else(&fn() -> Option<T>) -> Option<T>`
* add `option::ToOption`, `option::IntoOption`, `option::AsOption`, `result::ToResult`, `result::IntoResult`, `result::AsResult`, `either::ToEither`, and `either::IntoEither`, `either::AsEither`
* renamed `Option::chain*` and `Result::chain*` to `and_then` and `or_else` to avoid the eventual collision with `Iterator.chain`.
* Added a bunch of impls of `Default`
* Added a `#[deriving(Default)]` syntax extension
* Removed impls of `Zero` for `Option<T>` and vecs.
|
|
|
|
Closes #5794
|
|
The arg or capture type alias was actually never used for the capture
case, so the code is simplified with `Either<arg, ()>` replaced by `arg`
|
|
|
|
Servo is hitting this problem, so this is a workaround for a lack of a real solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes issue #9110, changes field_ty element to Name, adds test case, improves fail error message
|
|
The purpose of this macro is to further reduce the number of allocations which
occur when dealing with formatting strings. This macro will perform all of the
static analysis necessary to validate that a format string is safe, and then it
will wrap up the "format string" into an opaque struct which can then be passed
around.
Two safe functions are added (write/format) which take this opaque argument
structure, unwrap it, and then call the unsafe version of write/format (in an
unsafe block). Other than these two functions, it is not intended for anyone to
ever look inside this opaque struct.
The macro looks a bit odd, but mostly because of rvalue lifetimes this is the
only way for it to be safe that I know of.
Example use-cases of this are:
* third-party libraries can use the default formatting syntax without any
forced allocations
* the fail!() macro can avoid allocating the format string
* the logging macros can avoid allocation any strings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
