| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Fixes #22070.
Fixes #19372.
r? @sfackler
|
|
Fixes #22091
I'm not sure how to write a test for this. An ICE happens with spans that start near (after?) a null character or some other zero-width unicode character.
|
|
Rename several remaining `Show`s to Debug, `String`s to Display (mostly in comments and docs).
Update reference.md:
- derive() no longer supports Zero trait
- derive() now supports Copy trait
|
|
Add `QPath` construction support to `ExtCtxt`. Allows compiler plugins to generate calls with UFCS.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/test/compile-fail/reserved-be.rs
src/test/compile-fail/reserved-become.rs
src/test/parse-fail/reserved-be.rs
|
|
```rust
#[plugin] #[no_link] extern crate bleh;
```
becomes a crate attribute
```rust
#![plugin(bleh)]
```
The feature gate is still required.
It's almost never correct to link a plugin into the resulting library / executable, because it will bring all of libsyntax and librustc with it. However if you really want this behavior, you can get it with a separate `extern crate` item in addition to the `plugin` attribute.
Fixes #21043.
Fixes #20769.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Closes # 20022
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
#[plugin] #[no_link] extern crate bleh;
becomes a crate attribute
#![plugin(bleh)]
The feature gate is still required.
It's almost never correct to link a plugin into the resulting library /
executable, because it will bring all of libsyntax and librustc with it.
However if you really want this behavior, you can get it with a separate
`extern crate` item in addition to the `plugin` attribute.
Fixes #21043.
Fixes #20769.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Fixes #22070.
Fixes #19372.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #22091
|
|
Closes #20022
|
|
Update reference.md:
- derive() no longer supports Zero trait
- derive() now supports Copy trait
|
|
Makes the compilation abort when a parse error is encountered while
trying to parse an item in an included file. The previous behaviour was
to stop processing the file when a token that can't start an item was
encountered, without producing any error. Fixes #21146.
|
|
Fixes #21833.
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
The tests in #21912 will also need `#[feature(no_std)]`. If you're okay with both PRs, I can merge and test them.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #21833.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Fixes #16803.
Fixes #14342.
Fixes half of #21827 -- slice syntax is still broken.
|
|
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
make `for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... }` a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR.
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by @nikomatsakis (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e., it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
|
|
Makes the compilation abort when a parse error is encountered while
trying to parse an item in an included file. The previous behaviour was
to stop processing the file when a token that can't start an item was
encountered, without producing any error. Fixes #21146.
|
|
|
|
It's in order to make the code more homogeneous.
|
|
Fixes run build error
Fix test failure
Fix tests' errors
|
|
The word is repeated twice in the message like:
error: obsolete syntax: `:`, `&mut:`, or `&:` syntax
This removes the word syntax that appears in messages after the second colon (:).
|
|
The word is repeated twice in the message like
error: obsolete syntax: `:`, `&mut:`, or `&:` syntax
This removes the word syntax that appears in messages after the second colon (:).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
....
The 'stable_features' lint helps people progress from unstable to
stable Rust by telling them when they no longer need a `feature`
attribute because upstream Rust has declared it stable.
This compares to the existing 'unstable_features' lint, which is used
to implement feature staging, and triggers on *any* use
of `#[feature]`.
|
|
The spelling corrections were made in both documentation comments and
regular comments.
|
|
This can be considered partial work on #8256.
The main observable change: macro expansion sometimes results in spans where `lo > hi`; so for now, when we have such a span, do not attempt to return a snippet result.
(Longer term, we might think about whether we could still present a snippet for the cases where this arises, e.g. perhaps by showing the whole macro as the snippet, assuming that is the sole cause of such spans; or by somehow looking up the closest AST node that holds both `lo` and `hi`, and showing that.)
As a drive-by, revised the API to return a `Result` rather than an `Option`, with better information-packed error value that should help us (and maybe also our users) identify the causes of such problems in the future. Ideally the call-sites that really want an actual snippet would be updated to catch the newly added `Err` case and print something meaningful about it, but that is not part of this PR.
|
|
Implement step 1 of rust-lang/rfcs#702
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
|
|
In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of
ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding
the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop
itself, and no longer.
----
There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by
niko (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here
is that case:
```
fn main() {
let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new();
for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) }
}
```
Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a
semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e.,
it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot
actually be used.)
(The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test
by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new
striction.)
----
So, technically this is a:
[breaking-change]
|
|
This can be considered partial work on #8256.
The main observable change: macro expansion sometimes results in spans
where `lo > hi`; so for now, when we have such a span, do not attempt
to return a snippet result.
(Longer term, we might think about whether we could still present a
snippet for the cases where this arises, e.g. perhaps by showing the
whole macro as the snippet, assuming that is the sole cause of such
spans; or by somehow looking up the closest AST node that holds both
`lo` and `hi`, and showing that.)
As a drive-by, revised the API to return a `Result` rather than an
`Option`, with better information-packed error value that should help
us (and maybe also our users) identify the causes of such problems in
the future. Ideally the call-sites that really want an actual snippet
would be updated to catch the newly added `Err` case and print
something meaningful about it, but that is not part of this PR.
|
|
|
|
Update tests to change all `&expr[]` to `&expr[..]` to make sure pretty printing
passes.
|
|
The 'stable_features' lint helps people progress from unstable to
stable Rust by telling them when they no longer need a `feature`
attribute because upstream Rust has declared it stable.
This compares to the existing 'unstable_features', which is used
to implement feature staging, and triggers on *any* use
of `#[feature]`.
|
|
The spelling corrections were made in both documentation comments and
regular comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allows the expression `..` (without either endpoint) in general, can be
used in slicing syntax `&expr[..]` where we previously wrote `&expr[]`.
The old syntax &expr[] is not yet removed or warned for.
|
|
|
|
Closes #8706.
|
