| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This is useful when the information that is needed to do useful logging
is expensive to produce.
|
|
|
|
**Note**: I only tested on top of my #10670 PR, size reductions come from both change sets.
With this, [more enums are shrinked](https://gist.github.com/eddyb/08fef0dfc6ff54e890bc), the most significant one being `ast_node`, from 104 bytes (master) to 96 (#10670) and now to 32 bytes.
My own testcase requires **200MB** less when compiling (not including the other **200MB** gained in #10670), and rustc-stage2 is down by about **130MB**.
I believe there is more to gain by fiddling with the enums' layouts.
|
|
|
|
In this series of commits, I've implemented static linking for rust. The scheme I implemented was the same as my [mailing list post](https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html).
The commits have more details to the nitty gritty of what went on. I've rebased this on top of my native mutex pull request (#10479), but I imagine that it will land before this lands, I just wanted to pre-emptively get all the rebase conflicts out of the way (becuase this is reorganizing building librustrt as well).
Some contentious points I want to make sure are all good:
* I've added more "compiler chooses a default" behavior than I would like, I want to make sure that this is all very clearly outlined in the code, and if not I would like to remove behavior or make it clearer.
* I want to make sure that the new "fancy suite" tests are ok (using make/python instead of another rust crate)
If we do indeed pursue this, I would be more than willing to write up a document describing how linking in rust works. I believe that this behavior should be very understandable, and the compiler should never hinder someone just because linking is a little fuzzy.
|
|
critical enum sizes.
|
|
This PR does some small modernizations to the json library. First is to remove the `@` boxes, second is to rename the constructors to `new`.
|
|
|
|
This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate
and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html.
When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there
are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are
stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of
having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the
"complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons.
Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an
rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a
dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably
not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon.
Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that
are now opinionated in the compiler:
* If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will
prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option
* If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is
overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib,
dylib).
* If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in
the destination crate, then an executable is generated
With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic
dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on
librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit.
This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing
infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with
linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs
as a separate commit.
Closes #552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, `//// foo` and `/*** foo ***/` were accepted as doc comments. This
changes that, so that only `/// foo` and `/** foo ***/` are accepted. This
confuses many newcomers and it seems weird.
Also update the manual for these changes, and modernify the EBNF for comments.
Closes #10638
|
|
|
|
### Rationale
There is no reason to support more than 2³² nodes or names at this moment, as compiling something that big (even without considering the quadratic space usage of some analysis passes) would take at least **64GB**.
Meanwhile, some can't (or barely can) compile rustc because it requires almost **1.5GB**.
### Potential problems
Can someone confirm this doesn't affect metadata (de)serialization? I can't tell myself, I know nothing about it.
### Results
Some structures have a size reduction of 25% to 50%: [before](https://gist.github.com/luqmana/3a82a51fa9c86d9191fa) - [after](https://gist.github.com/eddyb/5a75f8973d3d8018afd3).
Sadly, there isn't a massive change in the memory used for compiling stage2 librustc (it doesn't go over **1.4GB** as [before](http://huonw.github.io/isrustfastyet/mem/), but I can barely see the difference).
However, my own testcase (previously peaking at **1.6GB** in typeck) shows a reduction of **200**-**400MB**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #4375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also moves `#[auto_{en,de}code]` checker from syntax to lint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #3614.
|
|
Fixes #3614.
|
|
Currently, the parser doesn't give any context when it finds an unclosed
delimiter and it's not EOF. Report the most recent unclosed delimiter, to help
the user along.
Closes #10636
|
|
There's no need for it to be @mut.
|
|
Currently, the parser doesn't give any context when it finds an unclosed
delimiter and it's not EOF. Report the most recent unclosed delimiter, to help
the user along.
Closes #10636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was needed to access UEFI boot services in my new Boot2Rust experiment.
I also realized that Rust functions declared as extern always use the C calling convention regardless of how they were declared, so this pull request fixes that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ToStr, Encodable and Decodable are not marked as such, since they're
already expensive, and lead to large methods, so inlining will bloat the
metadata & the binaries.
This means that something like
#[deriving(Eq)]
struct A { x: int }
creates an instance like
#[doc = "Automatically derived."]
impl ::std::cmp::Eq for A {
#[inline]
fn eq(&self, __arg_0: &A) -> ::bool {
match *__arg_0 {
A{x: ref __self_1_0} =>
match *self {
A{x: ref __self_0_0} => true && __self_0_0.eq(__self_1_0)
}
}
}
#[inline]
fn ne(&self, __arg_0: &A) -> ::bool {
match *__arg_0 {
A{x: ref __self_1_0} =>
match *self {
A{x: ref __self_0_0} => false || __self_0_0.ne(__self_1_0)
}
}
}
}
(The change being the `#[inline]` attributes.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ToStr, Encodable and Decodable are not marked as such, since they're
already expensive, and lead to large methods, so inlining will bloat the
metadata & the binaries.
This means that something like
#[deriving(Eq)]
struct A { x: int }
creates an instance like
#[doc = "Automatically derived."]
impl ::std::cmp::Eq for A {
#[inline]
fn eq(&self, __arg_0: &A) -> ::bool {
match *__arg_0 {
A{x: ref __self_1_0} =>
match *self {
A{x: ref __self_0_0} => true && __self_0_0.eq(__self_1_0)
}
}
}
#[inline]
fn ne(&self, __arg_0: &A) -> ::bool {
match *__arg_0 {
A{x: ref __self_1_0} =>
match *self {
A{x: ref __self_0_0} => false || __self_0_0.ne(__self_1_0)
}
}
}
}
(The change being the `#[inline]` attributes.)
|
|
Closes #10111
|
|
Closes #10111
|
