| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update tests to remove old numeric constants
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
|
|
Support repr(simd) on ADTs containing a single array field
This is a squash and rebase of `@gnzlbg's` #63531
I've never actually written code in the compiler before so just fumbled my way around until it would build 😅
I imagine there'll be some work we need to do in `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too for this now, but might need some input from `@bjorn3` to know what that is.
cc `@rust-lang/project-portable-simd`
-----
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
|
|
|
|
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
|
|
|
|
* Reject use of parameters inside naked function body.
* Reject use of patterns inside function parameters, to emphasize role
of parameters a signature declaration (mirroring existing behaviour
for function declarations) and avoid generating code introducing
specified bindings.
|
|
Allow using `-Z fewer-names=no` to retain value names
Change `-Z fewer-names` into an optional boolean flag and allow using it
to either discard value names when true or retain them when false,
regardless of other settings.
|
|
|
|
Drop support for all cloudabi targets
`cloudabi` is a tier-3 target, and [it is no longer being maintained upstream][no].
This PR drops supports for cloudabi targets. Those targets are:
* aarch64-unknown-cloudabi
* armv7-unknown-cloudabi
* i686-unknown-cloudabi
* x86_64-unknown-cloudabi
Since this drops supports for a target, I'd like somebody to tag `relnotes` label to this PR.
Some other issues:
* The tidy exception for `cloudabi` crate is still remained because
* `parking_lot v0.9.0` and `parking_lot v0.10.2` depends on `cloudabi v0.0.3`.
* `parking_lot v0.11.0` depends on `cloudabi v0.1.0`.
[no]: https://github.com/NuxiNL/cloudabi#note-this-project-is-unmaintained
|
|
Change `-Z fewer-names` into an optional boolean flag and allow using it
to either discard value names when true or retain them when false,
regardless of other settings.
|
|
This also required adding a loop guard in case clone panics
Add specialization for copy
There is a better version for copy, so I've added specialization for that function
and hopefully that should speed it up even more.
Switch FromIter<slice::Iter> to use `to_vec`
Test different unrolling version for to_vec
Revert to impl
From benchmarking, it appears this version is faster
|
|
|
|
The `#[naked]` attribute disabled prologue / epilogue emission for the
function and it is responsibility of a developer to provide them. The
compiler is no position to inline such functions correctly.
Disable inlining of naked functions at LLVM and MIR level.
|
|
Fix setting inline hint based on `InstanceDef::requires_inline`
For instances where `InstanceDef::requires_inline` is true, an attempt
is made to set an inline hint though a call to the `inline` function.
The attempt is ineffective, since all attributes will be usually removed
by the second call.
Fix the issue by applying the attributes only once, with user provided
attributes having a priority when provided.
Closes #79108.
|
|
Make codegen tests compatible with extra inlining
|
|
For instances where `InstanceDef::requires_inline` is true, an attempt
is made to set an inline hint though a call to the `inline` function.
The attempt is ineffective, since all attributes will be usually removed
by the second call.
Fix the issue by applying the attributes only once, with user provided
attributes having a priority when provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit grepped for LLVM_VERSION_GE, LLVM_VERSION_LT, get_major_version and
min-llvm-version and statically evaluated every expression possible
(and sensible) assuming that the LLVM version is >=9 now
|
|
|
|
|
|
The memory allocation in vec might panic in the case of capacity
overflow. Move the allocation outside the function to fix the test.
|
|
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a
single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD
abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
|
|
Add support for SHA256 source file hashing
Adds support for `-Z src-hash-algorithm sha256`, which became available in LLVM 11.
Using an older version of LLVM will cause an error `invalid checksum kind` if the hash algorithm is set to sha256.
r? `@eddyb`
cc #70401 `@est31`
|
|
The validator in visit_local asserts that local has a stroage when used,
but visit_local is never called so validation is ineffective.
Use super_statement and super_terminator to ensure that locals are visited.
|
|
Remove unused set-discriminant statements and assignments regardless of rvalue
* Represent use counts with u32
* Unify use count visitors
* Change RemoveStatements visitor into a function
* Remove unused set-discriminant statements
* Use exhaustive match to clarify what is being optimized
* Remove unused assignments regardless of rvalue kind
|
|
rustc_mir: track inlined callees in SourceScopeData.
We now record which MIR scopes are the roots of *other* (inlined) functions's scope trees, which allows us to generate the correct debuginfo in codegen, similar to what LLVM inlining generates.
This PR makes the `ui` test `backtrace-debuginfo` pass, if the MIR inliner is turned on by default.
Also, `#[track_caller]` is now correct in the face of MIR inlining (cc `@anp).`
Fixes #76997.
r? `@rust-lang/wg-mir-opt`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add codegen test for issue #73827
Closes #73827
|
|
|
|
Ideally, we would want to handle a broader set of cases to fully fix the
underlying bug here. That is currently relatively expensive at compile and
runtime, so we don't do that for now.
|
|
|
|
Pass tune-cpu to LLVM
I think this is how it should work...
See https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/expose-tune-cpu-from-llvm/13088 for the background. Or the documentation diff.
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77023#issuecomment-703987379
suggests that the original PR introduced a significant perf regression.
This reverts commit e44784b8750016a695361c990024750e037d8f9f / #77023.
|
|
|
|
Re-land PR #71840 (Rework MIR drop tree lowering)
PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71840 was reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72989 to fix an LLVM error (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72470). That LLVM error no longer occurs with the recent upgrade to LLVM 11 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73526), so let's try re-landing this PR.
I've cherry-picked the commits from the original PR (with the exception of the commit blessing test output), making as few modifications as possible. I addressed the rebase fallout in separate commits on top of those.
r? `@matthewjasper`
|
|
I think this is how it should work...
|
|
Hint the maximum length permitted by invariant of slices
One of the safety invariants of references, and in particular of references to slices, is that they may not cover more than `isize::MAX` bytes. The unsafe `from_raw_parts` constructors of slices explicitly requires the caller to guarantee this fact. Violating it would also be UB with regards to the semantics of generated llvm code.
This effectively bounds the length of a (non-ZST) slice from above by a compile time constant. But when the length is loaded from a function argument it appears llvm is not aware of this requirement. The additional value range assertions allow some further elision of code branches, including overflow checks, especially in the presence of artithmetic on the indices.
This may have a performance impact, adding more code to a common method but allowing more optimization. I'm not quite sure, is the Rust side of const-prop strong enough to elide the irrelevant match branches?
Fixes: #67186
|
|
Uses assume to check the length against a constant upper bound. The
inlined result then informs the optimizer of the sound value range.
This was tried with unreachable_unchecked before which introduces a
branch. This has the advantage of not being executed in sound code but
complicates basic blocks. It resulted in ~2% increased compile time in
some worst cases.
Add a codegen test for the assumption, testing the issue from #67186
|
|
|
|
Disable the SimplifyArmIdentity mir-opt
The optimization still has some bugs that need to be worked out
such as #77359.
We can try re-enabling this again after the known issues are resolved.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
The optimization still has some bugs that need to be worked out
such as #77359.
We can try re-enabling this again after the known issues are resolved.
|
