| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Deprecate `intrinsics::drop_in_place` and `collections::Bound`, which accidentally weren't deprecated
Fixes #82080.
I've taken the liberty of updating the `since` values to 1.52, since an unobservable deprecation isn't much of a deprecation (even the detailed release notes never bothered to mention these deprecations).
As mentioned in the issue I'm *pretty* sure that using a type alias for `Bound` is semantically equivalent to the re-export; [the reference implies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html) that type aliases only observably differ from types when used on unit structs or tuple structs, whereas `Bound` is an enum.
|
|
Adjust `-Ctarget-cpu=native` handling in cg_llvm
When cg_llvm encounters the `-Ctarget-cpu=native` it computes an
explciit set of features that applies to the target in order to
correctly compile code for the host CPU (because e.g. `skylake` alone is
not sufficient to tell if some of the instructions are available or
not).
However there were a couple of issues with how we did this. Firstly, the
order in which features were overriden wasn't quite right – conceptually
you'd expect `-Ctarget-cpu=native` option to override the features that
are implicitly set by the target definition. However due to how other
`-Ctarget-cpu` values are handled we must adopt the following order
of priority:
* Features from -Ctarget-cpu=*; are overriden by
* Features implied by --target; are overriden by
* Features from -Ctarget-feature; are overriden by
* function specific features.
Another problem was in that the function level `target-features`
attribute would overwrite the entire set of the globally enabled
features, rather than just the features the
`#[target_feature(enable/disable)]` specified. With something like
`-Ctarget-cpu=native` we'd end up in a situation wherein a function
without `#[target_feature(enable)]` annotation would have a broader
set of features compared to a function with one such attribute. This
turned out to be a cause of heavy run-time regressions in some code
using these function-level attributes in conjunction with
`-Ctarget-cpu=native`, for example.
With this PR rustc is more careful about specifying the entire set of
features for functions that use `#[target_feature(enable/disable)]` or
`#[instruction_set]` attributes.
Sadly testing the original reproducer for this behaviour is quite
impossible – we cannot rely on `-Ctarget-cpu=native` to be anything in
particular on developer or CI machines.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83027 `@BurntSushi`
|
|
When cg_llvm encounters the `-Ctarget-cpu=native` it computes an
explciit set of features that applies to the target in order to
correctly compile code for the host CPU (because e.g. `skylake` alone is
not sufficient to tell if some of the instructions are available or
not).
However there were a couple of issues with how we did this. Firstly, the
order in which features were overriden wasn't quite right – conceptually
you'd expect `-Ctarget-cpu=native` option to override the features that
are implicitly set by the target definition. However due to how other
`-Ctarget-cpu` values are handled we must adopt the following order
of priority:
* Features from -Ctarget-cpu=*; are overriden by
* Features implied by --target; are overriden by
* Features from -Ctarget-feature; are overriden by
* function specific features.
Another problem was in that the function level `target-features`
attribute would overwrite the entire set of the globally enabled
features, rather than just the features the
`#[target_feature(enable/disable)]` specified. With something like
`-Ctarget-cpu=native` we'd end up in a situation wherein a function
without `#[target_feature(enable)]` annotation would have a broader
set of features compared to a function with one such attribute. This
turned out to be a cause of heavy run-time regressions in some code
using these function-level attributes in conjunction with
`-Ctarget-cpu=native`, for example.
With this PR rustc is more careful about specifying the entire set of
features for functions that use `#[target_feature(enable/disable)]` or
`#[instruction_set]` attributes.
Sadly testing the original reproducer for this behaviour is quite
impossible – we cannot rely on `-Ctarget-cpu=native` to be anything in
particular on developer or CI machines.
|
|
Add support for storing code model to LLVM module IR
This patch avoids undefined behavior by linking different object files.
Also this would it could be propagated properly to LTO.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D52322 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D52323.
This patch is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74002
|
|
|
|
test: add test case
make tidy happy
|
|
This patch avoids undefined behavior by linking different object files.
Also this would it could be propagated properly to LTO.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D52322 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D52323.
This patch is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74002
|
|
Implement RFC 2945: "C-unwind" ABI
## Implement RFC 2945: "C-unwind" ABI
This branch implements [RFC 2945]. The tracking issue for this RFC is #74990.
The feature gate for the issue is `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
This RFC was created as part of the ffi-unwind project group tracked at rust-lang/lang-team#19.
### Changes
Further details will be provided in commit messages, but a high-level overview
of the changes follows:
* A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`,
and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI boundaries is
acceptable. The cases where each of these variants' `unwind` member is true
correspond with the `C-unwind`, `system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and
`thiscall-unwind` ABI strings introduced in RFC 2945 [3].
* This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings.
Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`, which
ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the new ABIs.
A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well.
* We adjust the `rustc_middle::ty::layout::fn_can_unwind` function,
used to compute whether or not a `FnAbi` object represents a function that
should be able to unwind when `panic=unwind` is in use.
* Changes are also made to
`rustc_mir_build::build::should_abort_on_panic` so that the function ABI is
used to determind whether it should abort, assuming that the `panic=unwind`
strategy is being used, and no explicit unwind attribute was provided.
[RFC 2945]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md
|
|
This removes all of the code we had in place to work-around LLVM's
handling of forward progress. From this removal excluded is a workaround
where we'd insert a `sideeffect` into clearly infinite loops such as
`loop {}`. This code remains conditionally effective when the LLVM
version is earlier than 12.0, which fixed the forward progress related
miscompilations at their root.
|
|
Fixes #82080
|
|
### Changes
This commit implements unwind ABI's, specified in RFC 2945.
We adjust the `rustc_middle::ty::layout::fn_can_unwind` function,
used to compute whether or not a `FnAbi` object represents a
function that should be able to unwind when `panic=unwind` is in
use.
Changes are also made to
`rustc_mir_build::build::should_abort_on_panic` so that the
function ABI is used to determind whether it should abort, assuming
that the `panic=unwind` strategy is being used, and no explicit
unwind attribute was provided.
### Tests
Unit tests, checking that the behavior is correct for `C-unwind`,
`stdcall-unwind`, `system-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind`, are
included. These alternative `unwind` ABI strings are specified in
RFC 2945, in the "_Other `unwind` ABI strings_" section.
Additionally, a test case is included to assert that the LLVM IR
generated for an external function defined with the `C-unwind` ABI
will be appropriately labeled with the `nounwind` LLVM attribute
when the `panic=abort` compilation flag is used.
### Ignore Directives
This commit uses `ignore-*` directives in two of our `*-unwind` ABI
test cases.
Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases
ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and `thiscall`,
respectively.
These directives are cribbed from
`src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and
`src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`.
|
|
Add regression test for #75525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrade to LLVM 12
This implements the necessary adjustments to make rustc work with LLVM 12. I didn't encounter any major issues so far.
r? `@cuviper`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure that we don't regress setting of the CU directory to the
working directory.
|
|
We escape certain LLVM-specific features when passing the inline
assembly string to the LLVM. Until now, however, there was no test
making sure this behaviour stays intact. This commit adds such a test!
|
|
This seems right, given that conceptually bools are unsigned, but the
implications of this change may have more action at distance that I'm
not sure how to exhaustively consider.
For instance there are a number of cases where code attaches range
metadata if `scalar.is_bool()` holds. Supposedly it would no longer be
attached to the `repr(i8)` enums? Though I'm not sure why booleans are
being special-cased here in the first place...
Fixes #80556
|
|
|
|
Add `as_rchunks` (and friends) to slices
`@est31` mentioned (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76354#issuecomment-717027175) that, for completeness, there needed to be an `as_chunks`-like method that chunks from the end (with the remainder at the beginning) like `rchunks` does.
So here's a PR for `as_rchunks: &[T] -> (&[T], &[[T; N]])` and `as_rchunks_mut: &mut [T] -> (&mut [T], &mut [[T; N]])`.
But as I was doing this and copy-pasting `from_raw_parts` calls, I thought that I should extract that into an unsafe method. It started out a private helper, but it seemed like `as_chunks_unchecked` could be reasonable as a "real" method, so I added docs and made it public. Let me know if you think it doesn't pull its weight.
|
|
This fixed things the last time I had a problem like this. And plausibly will here too -- the check it's failing on is for the high bit being set in the length of the slice, which is a check that's only in a debug_assert.
|
|
implement ptr::write without dedicated intrinsic
This makes `ptr::write` more consistent with `ptr::write_unaligned`, `ptr::read`, `ptr::read_unaligned`, all of which are implemented in terms of `copy_nonoverlapping`.
This means we can also remove `move_val_init` implementations in codegen and Miri, and its special handling in the borrow checker.
Also see [this Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/ptr.3A.3Aread.20vs.20ptr.3A.3Awrite).
|
|
|
|
Use probe-stack=inline-asm in LLVM 11+
Fixes (?) #74405, related to #43241
r? `@cuviper`
|
|
|
|
Remove unreachable panics from VecDeque::{front/back}[_mut]
`VecDeque`'s `front`, `front_mut`, `back` and `back_mut` methods are implemented in terms of the index operator, which causes these functions to contain [unreachable panic calls](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/MTnq1o).
This PR reimplements these methods in terms of `get[_mut]` instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This resurrects #71735.
Fixes #71602, helps with #80140.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update tests to remove old numeric constants
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
|
|
Support repr(simd) on ADTs containing a single array field
This is a squash and rebase of `@gnzlbg's` #63531
I've never actually written code in the compiler before so just fumbled my way around until it would build 😅
I imagine there'll be some work we need to do in `rustc_codegen_cranelift` too for this now, but might need some input from `@bjorn3` to know what that is.
cc `@rust-lang/project-portable-simd`
-----
This PR allows using `#[repr(simd)]` on ADTs containing a single array field:
```rust
#[repr(simd)] struct S0([f32; 4]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S1<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
#[repr(simd)] struct S2<T, const N: usize>([T; N]);
```
This should allow experimenting with portable packed SIMD abstractions on nightly that make use of const generics.
|
|
|
|
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
|
|
|
|
* Reject use of parameters inside naked function body.
* Reject use of patterns inside function parameters, to emphasize role
of parameters a signature declaration (mirroring existing behaviour
for function declarations) and avoid generating code introducing
specified bindings.
|
