| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Define UB in float-to-int casts to saturate
This closes #10184 by defining the behavior there to saturate infinities and values exceeding the integral range (on the lower or upper end). `NaN` is sent to zero.
|
|
- Round to zero, and representable values cast directly.
- `NaN` goes to 0
- Values beyond the limits of the type are saturated to the "nearest value"
(essentially rounding to zero, in some sense) in the integral type, so e.g.
`f32::INFINITY` would go to `{u,i}N::MAX.`
|
|
When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target.
This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as
there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three
possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which
an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or
unwind tables.
Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code
size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads).
In code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful
to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to
reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than
with frame pointers, but it is still possible.
This commit adds a compiler option which allows a user to force the
addition of unwind tables. Unwind tables cannot be disabled on targets
that require them for correctness, or when using `-C panic=unwind`.
|
|
Mostly renamed allocations, but I'm not sure about the const prop tests
|
|
Update the minimum external LLVM to 8
LLVM 8 was released on March 20, 2019, over a year ago.
|
|
The `FnAbi` now knows if the function is allowed to unwind. If a
function isn't allowed to unwind, we can use a `call` instead of an
`invoke`.
This resolves an issue when calling LLVM intrinsics which cannot unwind
LLVM will generate an error if you attempt to invoke them so we need to
ignore cleanup blocks in codegen and generate a call instead.
|
|
LLVM 8 was released on March 20, 2019, over a year ago.
|
|
* Adds either an MD5 or SHA1 hash to the debug info.
* Adds new unstable option `-Z src-hash-algorithm` to control the hashing algorithm.
|
|
|
|
debug-assert ptr sanity in ptr::write
This is a re-submission of the parts that we removed from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69208 due to ["interesting" test failures](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69208#issuecomment-591310437).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53871
r? @Mark-Simulacrum @eddyb
|
|
Emit 1-based column numbers in debuginfo
* Use byte offsets instead of char position offsets. Resolves #67360.
* Use 1-based offsets instead of 0-based ones. Resolves #65437.
* Consistently omit column information for msvc targets, matching clang behaviour (previously columns have been omitted from `DILocation`, but not from `DILexicalBlock`).
|
|
|
|
Optimize catch_unwind to match C++ try/catch
This refactors the implementation of catching unwinds to allow LLVM to inline the "try" closure directly into the happy path, avoiding indirection. This means that the catch_unwind implementation is (after this PR) zero-cost unless a panic is thrown.
https://rust.godbolt.org/z/cZcUSB is an example of the current codegen in a simple case. Notably, the codegen is *exactly the same* if `-Cpanic=abort` is passed, which is clearly not great.
This PR, on the other hand, generates the following assembly:
```asm
# -Cpanic=unwind:
push rbx
mov ebx,0x2a
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c53c] # <happy>
mov eax,ebx
pop rbx
ret
mov rdi,rax
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c537] # cleanup function call
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c539] # <unfortunate>
mov ebx,0xd
mov eax,ebx
pop rbx
ret
# -Cpanic=abort:
push rax
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x20a1] # <happy>
mov eax,0x2a
pop rcx
ret
```
Fixes #64224, and resolves #64222.
|
|
Add support for LLVM globals corresponding to miri allocations should be named alloc123
Adds support for this request from @eddyb in #69134:
> That is, if -Zfewer-names is false (usually only because of --emit=llvm-ir), we should use the same name for LLVM globals we generate out of miri allocs as #67133 does in MIR output (allocN).
>
>This way, we can easily see the mapping between MIR and LLVM IR (and it shouldn't be any costlier for regular compilation, which would continue to use unnamed globals).
r? @eddyb
cc @oli-obk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Match `@__msan_keep_going = weak_odr constant i32 1`.
|
|
We execpt the try intrinsic to be a direct call if in -Cpanic=abort mode, and
that catch_unwind optimizes out if calling a function that does not unwind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The debuginfo column numbers are 1-based. The value 0 indicates that no
column has been specified. Translate 0-based column numbers to 1-based
when emitting debug information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new pass manager can be enabled using
-Z new-llvm-pass-manager=on.
|
|
rustc_codegen_ssa: only "spill" SSA-like values to the stack for debuginfo.
This is an implementation of the idea described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68817#issuecomment-583719182.
In short, instead of debuginfo forcing otherwise-SSA-like MIR locals into `alloca`s, and requiring a `load` for each use (or two, for scalar pairs), the `alloca` is now *only* used for attaching debuginfo with `llvm.dbg.declare`: the `OperandRef` is stored to the `alloca`, but *never loaded* from it.
Outside of `debug_introduce_local`, nothing cares about the debuginfo-only `alloca`, and instead works with `OperandRef` the same as MIR locals without debuginfo before this PR.
This should have some of the benefits of `llvm.dbg.value`, while working today.
cc @nagisa @nikomatsakis
|
|
Remove problematic specialization from RangeInclusive
Fixes #67194 using the approach [outlined by Mark-Simulacrum](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67194#issuecomment-581669549).
> I believe the property we want is that if `PartialEq(&self, &other) == true`, then `self.next() == other.next()`. It is true that this is satisfied by removing the specialization and always doing `is_empty.unwrap_or_default()`; the "wrong" behavior there arises from calling `next()` having an effect on initially empty ranges, as we should be in `is_empty = true` but are not (yet) there. It might be possible to detect that the current state is always empty (i.e., `start > end`) and then not fill in the empty slot. I think this might solve the problem without regressing tests; however, this could have performance implications.
> That approach essentially states that we only use the `is_empty` slot for cases where `start <= end`. That means that `Idx: !Step` and `start > end` would both behave the same, and correctly -- we do not need the boolean if we're not ever going to emit any values from the iterator.
This is implemented here by replacing the `is_empty: Option<bool>` slot with an `exhausted: bool` slot. This flag is
- `false` upon construction,
- `false` when iteration has not yielded an element -- importantly, this means it is always `false` for an iterator empty by construction,
- `false` when iteration has yielded an element and the iterator is not exhausted, and
- only `true` when iteration has been used to exhaust the iterator.
For completeness, this also adds a note to the `Debug` representation to note when the range is exhausted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement proper C ABI lowering for RISC-V
This is necessary for full RISC-V psABI compliance when passing argument across C FFI boundary.
cc @lenary
|
|
Add `no_sanitize` attribute that allows to opt out from sanitizer
instrumentation in an annotated function.
|
|
|
|
This patch enables rustc to emit the required LLVM module flags to enable Control Flow Guard metadata (cfguard=1) or metadata and checks (cfguard=2). The LLVM module flags are ignored on unsupported targets and operating systems.
|
|
Stabilize `#[repr(transparent)]` on `enum`s in Rust 1.42.0
# Stabilization report
The following is the stabilization report for `#![feature(transparent_enums)]`.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60405
[Version target](https://forge.rust-lang.org/#current-release-versions): 1.42 (2020-01-30 => beta, 2020-03-12 => stable).
## User guide
A `struct` with only a single non-ZST field (let's call it `foo`) can be marked as `#[repr(transparent)]`. Such a `struct` has the same layout and ABI as `foo`. Here, we also extend this ability to `enum`s with only one variant, subject to the same restrictions as for the equivalent `struct`. That is, you can now write:
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
enum Foo { Bar(u8) }
```
which, in terms of layout and ABI, is equivalent to:
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
struct Foo(u8);
```
## Motivation
This is not a major feature that will unlock new and important use-cases. The utility of `repr(transparent)` `enum`s is indeed limited. However, there is still some value in it:
1. It provides conceptual simplification of the language in terms of treating univariant `enum`s and `struct`s the same, as both are product types. Indeed, languages like Haskell only have `data` as the only way to construct user-defined ADTs in the language.
2. In rare occasions, it might be that the user started out with a univariant `enum` for whatever reason (e.g. they thought they might extend it later). Now they want to make this `enum` `transparent` without breaking users by turning it into a `struct`. By lifting the restriction here, now they can.
## Technical specification
The reference specifies [`repr(transparent)` on a `struct`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/type-layout.html#the-transparent-representation) as:
> ### The transparent Representation
>
> The `transparent` representation can only be used on `struct`s that have:
> - a single field with non-zero size, and
> - any number of fields with size 0 and alignment 1 (e.g. `PhantomData<T>`).
>
> Structs with this representation have the same layout and ABI as the single non-zero sized field.
>
> This is different than the `C` representation because a struct with the `C` representation will always have the ABI of a `C` `struct` while, for example, a struct with the `transparent` representation with a primitive field will have the ABI of the primitive field.
>
> Because this representation delegates type layout to another type, it cannot be used with any other representation.
Here, we amend this to include univariant `enum`s as well with the same static restrictions and the same effects on dynamic semantics.
## Tests
All the relevant tests are adjusted in the PR diff but are recounted here:
- `src/test/ui/repr/repr-transparent.rs` checks that `repr(transparent)` on an `enum` must be univariant, rather than having zero or more than one variant. Restrictions on the fields inside the only variants, like for those on `struct`s, are also checked here.
- A number of codegen tests are provided as well:
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent.rs` (the canonical test)
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent-aggregates-1.rs`
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent-aggregates-2.rs`
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent-aggregates-3.rs`
- `src/test/ui/lint/lint-ctypes-enum.rs` tests the interactions with the `improper_ctypes` lint.
## History
- 2019-04-30, RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2645
Author: @mjbshaw
Reviewers: The Language Team
This is the RFC that proposes allowing `#[repr(transparent)]` on `enum`s and `union`.
- 2019-06-11, PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60463
Author: @mjbshaw
Reviewers: @varkor and @rkruppe
The PR implements the RFC aforementioned in full.
- 2019, PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67323
Author: @Centril
Reviewers: @davidtwco
The PR reorganizes the static checks taking advantage of the fact that `struct`s and `union`s are internally represented as ADTs with a single variant.
- This PR stabilizes `transparent_enums`.
## Related / possible future work
The remaining work here is to figure out the semantics of `#[repr(transparent)]` on `union`s and stabilize those. This work continues to be tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60405.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare for LLVM 10 upgrade
Split off from #67759, this just adds the necessary compatibility bits and updates codegen tests, without performing the actual LLVM upgrade.
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLVM 8 (D56351) introduced "frame-pointer". In LLVM 10 (D71863),
"no-frame-pointer-elim"/"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" will be
ignored.
|
|
This reverts commit 8f6197f39f7d468dfc5b2bd41dae4769992a2f83.
|
|
krishna-veerareddy:issue-66780-bool-ord-optimization, r=sfackler
Optimize Ord trait implementation for bool
Casting the booleans to `i8`s and converting their difference into `Ordering` generates better assembly than casting them to `u8`s and comparing them.
Fixes #66780
#### Comparison([Godbolt link](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/PjBpvF))
##### Old assembly:
```asm
example::boolean_cmp:
mov ecx, edi
xor ecx, esi
test esi, esi
mov eax, 255
cmove eax, ecx
test edi, edi
cmovne eax, ecx
ret
```
##### New assembly:
```asm
example::boolean_cmp:
mov eax, edi
sub al, sil
ret
```
##### Old LLVM-MCA statistics:
```
Iterations: 100
Instructions: 800
Total Cycles: 234
Total uOps: 1000
Dispatch Width: 6
uOps Per Cycle: 4.27
IPC: 3.42
Block RThroughput: 1.7
```
##### New LLVM-MCA statistics:
```
Iterations: 100
Instructions: 300
Total Cycles: 110
Total uOps: 500
Dispatch Width: 6
uOps Per Cycle: 4.55
IPC: 2.73
Block RThroughput: 1.0
```
|
|
codegen "unreachable" for invalid SetDiscriminant
Follow-up from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66960. I also realized I don't understand our policy for using `abort` vs `unreachable`. AFAIK `abort` is safe to call and just aborts the process, while `unreachable` is UB. But sometimes we use both, like here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d825e35ee8325146e6c175a4c61bcb645b347d5e/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/mir/block.rs#L827-L828
and here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d825e35ee8325146e6c175a4c61bcb645b347d5e/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/mir/block.rs#L264-L265
The second case is even more confusing because that looks like an unreachable `return` to me, so why would we codegen a safe abort there?
r? @eddyb Cc @oli-obk
|
|
|
