| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
parser recovery (so that expected errors match up)
I'm opting into parser recovery in all these cases out of expediency,
not because the error messages you get with recovery enabled are
actually all that usable in all cases listed.
|
|
|
|
Statement macros are now treated somewhat like item macros, in that a statement macro can now expand into a series of statements, rather than just a single statement.
This allows statement macros to be nested inside other kinds of macros and expand properly, where previously the expansion would only work when no nesting was present.
See:
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-stmt_macro_in_expr_macro.rs`
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-nested_stmt_macro.rs`
This changes the interface of the MacResult trait. make_stmt has become make_stmts and now returns a vector, rather than a single item. Plugin writers who were implementing MacResult will have breakage, as well as anyone using MacEager::stmt.
See:
- `src/libsyntax/ext/base.rs`
This also causes a minor difference in behavior to the diagnostics produced by certain malformed macros.
See:
- `src/test/compile-fail/macro-incomplete-parse.rs`
|
|
Statement macros are now treated somewhat like item macros, in that a
statement macro can now expand into a series of statements, rather than
just a single statement.
This allows statement macros to be nested inside other kinds of macros and
expand properly, where previously the expansion would only work when no
nesting was present.
See: src/test/run-pass/macro-stmt_macro_in_expr_macro.rs
src/test/run-pass/macro-nested_stmt_macro.rs
This changes the interface of the MacResult trait. make_stmt has become
make_stmts and now returns a vector, rather than a single item. Plugin
writers who were implementing MacResult will have breakage, as well as
anyone using MacEager::stmt.
See: src/libsyntax/ext/base.rs
This also causes a minor difference in behavior to the diagnostics
produced by certain malformed macros.
See: src/test/compile-fail/macro-incomplete-parse.rs
|
|
Issue #22425
|
|
|
|
followed by a semicolon.
This allows code like `vec![1i, 2, 3].len();` to work.
This breaks code that uses macros as statements without putting
semicolons after them, such as:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b)
assert!(c == d)
println(...);
}
It also breaks code that uses macros as items without semicolons:
local_data_key!(foo)
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
Add semicolons to fix this code. Those two examples can be fixed as
follows:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b);
assert!(c == d);
println(...);
}
local_data_key!(foo);
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
RFC #378.
Closes #18635.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
Closes #2569
|
|
Closes #4375
|
|
|
|
That is, only a single expression or item gets parsed, so if there are
any extra tokens (e.g. the start of another item/expression) the user
should be told, rather than silently dropping them.
An example:
macro_rules! foo {
() => {
println("hi");
println("bye);
}
}
would expand to just `println("hi")`, which is almost certainly not
what the programmer wanted.
Fixes #8012.
|
