rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2011-09-12	Reformat for new mode syntax, step 1	Marijn Haverbeke	-2/+2
	Long lines were fixed in a very crude way, as I'll be following up with another reformat in a bit.
2011-08-20	Reformat	Brian Anderson	-1/+1
	This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-16	Port the tests to the decl foo<T> syntax.	Erick Tryzelaar	-1/+1

2011-08-16	Port the tests to the typaram foo<T> syntax.	Erick Tryzelaar	-1/+2

2011-08-12	Convert most working tests to ivecs	Brian Anderson	-2/+2
	I tried to pay attention to what was actually being tested so, e.g. when I test was just using a vec as a boxed thing, I converted to boxed ints, etc. Haven't converted the macro tests yet. Not sure what to do there.
2011-08-03	Remove all xfail-stage0 directives	Brian Anderson	-1/+0
	While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27	Reformat for new syntax	Marijn Haverbeke	-6/+4

2011-07-12	Make resolve check for type-variable name-shadowing	Tim Chevalier	-5/+2
	Capturing a type argument in the enclosing scope should be an error -- this commit implements that check in resolve, avoiding a potential assertion failure in trans. Closes #648.
2011-06-21	Emit a better error message for unbound type parameters in nested functions	Tim Chevalier	-0/+11
	This code was causing a bounds check failure: fn hd[U](&vec[U] v) -> U { fn hd1(&vec[U] w) -> U { ret w.(0); } ret hd1(v); } because in hd1, U was being treated as if it referred to a type parameter of hd1, rather than referring to the lexically enclosing binding for U that's part of hd. I'm actually not sure whether this is a legit program or not. But I wanted to get rid of the bounds check error, so I assumed that program shouldn't compile and made it a proper error message.