| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
hide internal types/traits from std docs via new #[doc(masked)] attribute
Fixes #43701 (hopefully for good this time)
This PR introduces a new parameter to the `#[doc]` attribute that rustdoc looks for on `extern crate` statements. When it sees `#[doc(masked)]` on such a statement, it hides traits and types from that crate from appearing in either the "Trait Implementations" section of many type pages, or the "Implementors" section of trait pages. This is then applied to the `libc`/`rand`/`compiler_builtins` imports in libstd to prevent those crates from creating broken links in the std docs.
Like in #43348, this also introduces a feature gate, `doc_masked`, that controls the use of this parameter.
To view the std docs generated with this change, head to https://tonberry.quietmisdreavus.net/std-43701/std/index.html.
|
|
Get `allow(unused_mut)` to work on `let` bindings
fixes #40491
|
|
|
|
This boolean field on the error `Handler` is toggled to silence
warnings when `-A warnings` is passed. (This is actually a separate
mechanism from the global lint level—whether there's some redundancy
to be factored away here is an important question, but not one we
concern ourselves with in this commit.) But the same rationale
applies for `--cap-lints allow`. In particular, this makes the "soft"
feature-gate warning introduced in 8492ad24 (which is not a lint, but
just calls `struct_span_warn`) not pollute the builds of dependent
crates.
Thanks to @kennytm for pointing out the potential of
`can_emit_warnings` for this purpose.
Resolves #44213.
|
|
fixes #40491
|
|
|
|
Stabilize drop_types_in_const.
Closes #33156, stabilizing the new, revised, rules, and improving the error message.
r? @nikomatsakis cc @SergioBenitez
|
|
Evaluate fixed-length array length expressions lazily.
This is in preparation for polymorphic array lengths (aka `[T; T::A]`) and const generics.
We need deferred const-evaluation to break cycles when array types show up in positions which require knowing the array type to typeck the array length, e.g. the array type is in a `where` clause.
The final step - actually passing bounds in scope to array length expressions from the parent - is not done because it still produces cycles when *normalizing* `ParamEnv`s, and @nikomatsakis' in-progress lazy normalization work is needed to deal with that uniformly.
However, the changes here are still useful to unlock work on const generics, which @EpicatSupercell manifested interest in, and I might be mentoring them for that, but we need this baseline first.
r? @nikomatsakis cc @oli-obk
|
|
Fix regression in promotion of rvalues referencing a static
This commit makes librustc_passes::consts::CheckCrateVisitor properly
mark expressions as promotable if they reference a static, as it's
perfectly fine for one static to reference another. It fixes a
regression that prevented a temporary rvalue from referencing a static
if it was itself declared within a static.
Prior to commit https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/b8c05fe90bc,
`region::ScopeTree` would only register a 'terminating scope' for function
bodies. Thus, while rvalues in a static that referenced a static would be marked
unpromotable, the lack of enclosing scope would cause
mem_categorization::MemCategorizationContext::cat_rvalue_node
to compute a 'temporary scope' of `ReStatic`. Since this had the same
effect as explicitly selecting a scope of `ReStatic`
due to the rvalue being marked by CheckCrateVisitor as promotable,
no issue occurred.
However, commit https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/b8c05fe90bc
made ScopeTree unconditionally register a 'terminating scope'
Since mem_categorization would now compute a non-static 'temporary scope', the
aforementioned rvalues would be erroneously marked as living for too
short a time.
By fixing the behavior of CheckCrateVisitor, this commit avoids changing
mem_categorization's behavior, while ensuring that temporary values in
statics are still allowed to reference other statics.
Fixes issue #44373
|
|
|
|
Extend E0623 for LateBound and EarlyBound Regions
This is a fix for #43882
```
fn foo<'a,'b>(x: &mut Vec<&'a u8>, y: &'b u8) {
x.push(y);
}
```
now gives
```
error[E0623]: lifetime mismatch
--> $DIR/ex3-both-anon-regions-latebound-regions.rs:12:12
|
11 | fn foo<'a,'b>(x: &mut Vec<&'a u8>, y: &'b u8) {
| ------ ------ these two types are declared with different lifetimes...
12 | x.push(y);
| ^ ...but data from `y` flows into `x` here
```
cc @nikomatsakis @arielb1
Please ignore the second commit. It will be merged in a separate PR.
|
|
add test for #41229
Closes #41229
|
|
Expect pipe symbol after closure parameter list
Fixes #44021.
---
Originally, the parser just called `bump` to discard following token after parsing closure parameter list, because it assumes `|` is following. However, the following code breaks the assumption:
```rust
struct MyStruct;
impl MyStruct {
fn f() {|x, y}
}
```
Here, the parameter list is `x, y` and the following token is `}`. The parser discards `}`, and then we have a curly bracket mismatch.
Indeed, this code has a syntax error. On current nightly, the compiler emits an syntax error, but with incorrect message and span, followed by an ICE.
```
error: expected expression, found `}`
--> 44021.rs:4:1
|
4 | }
| ^
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
```
Even worse, on current stable(1.20.0), the compiler falls into an infinite loop.
This pull request fixes this problem. Now the compiler emits correct error message and span, and does not ICE.
```
error: expected one of `:`, `@`, or `|`, found `}`
--> 44021.rs:3:20
|
3 | fn foo() {|x, y}
| ^ expected one of `:`, `@`, or `|` here
```
|
|
rustc: Separately feature gate repr(i128)
Brought up during the discussion of #35118, the support for this is still
somewhat buggy and so stabilization likely wants to be considered independently
of the type itself.
|
|
Closes #41229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow Drop types in const's too, with #![feature(drop_types_in_const)].
Implements the remaining amendment, see #33156. cc @SergioBenitez
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
Migrate a slew of metadata methods to queries
This PR intends to make more progress on #41417, knocking off some low-hanging fruit.
Closes #44190
cc #44137
|
|
Make the LocalKey facade of thread_local! inlineable cross-crate.
Fixes (almost*) #25088 by changing the `LocalKey` `static` `thread_local!` generates to a `const`.
This can be done because a `LocalKey` value holds no actual TLS data, only function pointers to get at said data, and it could even be made `Copy` without any negative consequences.
The recent stabilization of rvalue promotion to `'static` allows doing this without changing the API.
r? @alexcrichton
*almost because we can't yet inline `__getit` because it breaks on MSVC, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43931#issuecomment-323534214
|
|
Add test for #22706
Closes #22706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit primarily removes the `stability` field from `TyCtxt` as well as its
internal mutable state, instead using a query to build the stability index as
well as primarily using queries for other related lookups.
Like previous commits the calculation of the stability index is wrapped in a
`with_ignore` node to avoid regressing the current tests, and otherwise this
commit also introduces #44232 but somewhat intentionally so.
|
|
Given the previous commit, these are now trivially representable as queries!
|
|
This commit started by moving methods from `CrateStore` to queries, but it ended
up necessitating some deeper refactorings to move more items in general to
queries.
Before this commit the *resolver* would walk over the AST and process foreign
modules (`extern { .. }` blocks) and collect `#[link]` annotations. It would
then also process the command line `-l` directives and such. This information
was then stored as precalculated lists in the `CrateStore` object for iterating
over later.
After this, commit, however, this pass no longer happens during resolution but
now instead happens through queries. A query for the linked libraries of a crate
will crawl the crate for `extern` blocks and then process the linkage
annotations at that time.
|
|
|
|
Produce expansion info for more builtin macros
r? @jseyfried
fixes #43268
|
|
Closes #22706
|
|
|
|
|
|
rustc: Flag {i,u}128 as unsafe for FFI
These don't appear to have a stable ABI as noted in #41799 and the work in
compiler-builtins definitely seems to be confirming it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
These don't appear to have a stable ABI as noted in #41799 and the work in
compiler-builtins definitely seems to be confirming it!
|
|
Brought up during the discussion of #35118, the support for this is still
somewhat buggy and so stabilization likely wants to be considered independently
of the type itself.
|
|
|
|
Forward-compatibly deny drops in constants if they *could* actually run.
This is part of #40036, specifically the checks for user-defined destructor invocations on locals which *may not* have been moved away, the motivating example being:
```rust
const FOO: i32 = (HasDrop {...}, 0).1;
```
The evaluation of constant MIR will continue to create `'static` slots for more locals than is necessary (if `Storage{Live,Dead}` statements are ignored), but it shouldn't be misusable.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
Remove the trait selection impl in method::probe
This removes the hacky trait selection reimplementation in `method::probe`, which occasionally comes and causes problems.
There are 2 issues I've found with this approach:
1. The older implementation sometimes had a "guess" type from an impl, which allowed subtyping to work. This is why I needed to make a change in `libtest`: there's an `impl<A> Clone for fn(A)` and we're calling `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone`. The older implementation would do a subtyping between the impl type and the trait type, so it would do the check for `<fn(A) as Clone>::clone`, and confirmation would continue with the subtyping. The newer implementation directly passes `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone` to selection, which fails. I'm not sure how big of a problem that would be in reality, especially after #43690 would remove the `Clone` problem, but I still want a crater run to avoid breaking the world.
2. The older implementation "looked into" impls to display error messages. I'm not sure that's an advantage - it looked exactly 1 level deep.
r? @eddyb
|
|
|
|
feature error span on attribute for fn_must_use, SIMD/align reprs, macro reëxport
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available
error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it
would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the
attribute is removed, the function/struct/_&c._ likely still makes sense and the
program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for
the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is
little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
|
|
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the
feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with
the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point
to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the
function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will
compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the
`main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which
there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
