summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/for-loop-fail.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2012-07-01Convert to new closure syntaxBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-06-29Switch the compiler over to using ~[] notation instead of []/~. Closes #2759.Michael Sullivan-1/+1
2012-06-25Make vectors uglier ([]/~). Sorry. Should be temporary. Closes #2725.Michael Sullivan-1/+1
2012-04-06Convert old-style for loops to new-styleMarijn Haverbeke-1/+1
Most could use the each method, but because of the hack used to disambiguate old- and new-style loops, some had to use vec::each. (This hack will go away soon.) Issue #1619
2011-08-20ReformatBrian Anderson-1/+1
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-15The wonky for...in... whitespace was bothering me. Sorry!Lindsey Kuper-1/+1
2011-08-12Convert most working tests to ivecsBrian Anderson-1/+1
I tried to pay attention to what was actually being tested so, e.g. when I test was just using a vec as a boxed thing, I converted to boxed ints, etc. Haven't converted the macro tests yet. Not sure what to do there.
2011-08-03Remove all xfail-stage0 directivesBrian Anderson-1/+0
While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27Reformat for new syntaxMarijn Haverbeke-6/+1
2011-07-05Handle fail inside a for-each loop properlyTim Chevalier-0/+7