about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/for-loop-fail.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2013-05-14Use static string with fail!() and remove fail!(fmt!())Björn Steinbrink-1/+1
fail!() used to require owned strings but can handle static strings now. Also, it can pass its arguments to fmt!() on its own, no need for the caller to call fmt!() itself.
2013-02-13Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3Nick Desaulniers-1/+1
2013-02-01check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-1/+1
2013-01-31Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macroNick Desaulniers-1/+1
2012-12-10Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.Graydon Hoare-0/+10
2012-07-14Move the world over to using the new style string literals and types. Closes ↵Michael Sullivan-1/+1
#2907.
2012-07-01Convert to new closure syntaxBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-06-29Switch the compiler over to using ~[] notation instead of []/~. Closes #2759.Michael Sullivan-1/+1
2012-06-25Make vectors uglier ([]/~). Sorry. Should be temporary. Closes #2725.Michael Sullivan-1/+1
2012-04-06Convert old-style for loops to new-styleMarijn Haverbeke-1/+1
Most could use the each method, but because of the hack used to disambiguate old- and new-style loops, some had to use vec::each. (This hack will go away soon.) Issue #1619
2011-08-20ReformatBrian Anderson-1/+1
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-15The wonky for...in... whitespace was bothering me. Sorry!Lindsey Kuper-1/+1
2011-08-12Convert most working tests to ivecsBrian Anderson-1/+1
I tried to pay attention to what was actually being tested so, e.g. when I test was just using a vec as a boxed thing, I converted to boxed ints, etc. Haven't converted the macro tests yet. Not sure what to do there.
2011-08-03Remove all xfail-stage0 directivesBrian Anderson-1/+0
While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27Reformat for new syntaxMarijn Haverbeke-6/+1
2011-07-05Handle fail inside a for-each loop properlyTim Chevalier-0/+7