| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-05-14 | Use static string with fail!() and remove fail!(fmt!()) | Björn Steinbrink | -1/+1 | |
| fail!() used to require owned strings but can handle static strings now. Also, it can pass its arguments to fmt!() on its own, no need for the caller to call fmt!() itself. | ||||
| 2013-02-13 | Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3 | Nick Desaulniers | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-02-01 | check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree | Graydon Hoare | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-01-31 | Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macro | Nick Desaulniers | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-12-10 | Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. | Graydon Hoare | -0/+10 | |
| 2012-07-14 | Move the world over to using the new style string literals and types. Closes ↵ | Michael Sullivan | -1/+1 | |
| #2907. | ||||
| 2012-07-01 | Convert to new closure syntax | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-06-29 | Switch the compiler over to using ~[] notation instead of []/~. Closes #2759. | Michael Sullivan | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-06-25 | Make vectors uglier ([]/~). Sorry. Should be temporary. Closes #2725. | Michael Sullivan | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-04-06 | Convert old-style for loops to new-style | Marijn Haverbeke | -1/+1 | |
| Most could use the each method, but because of the hack used to disambiguate old- and new-style loops, some had to use vec::each. (This hack will go away soon.) Issue #1619 | ||||
| 2011-08-20 | Reformat | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[] | ||||
| 2011-08-15 | The wonky for...in... whitespace was bothering me. Sorry! | Lindsey Kuper | -1/+1 | |
| 2011-08-12 | Convert most working tests to ivecs | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| I tried to pay attention to what was actually being tested so, e.g. when I test was just using a vec as a boxed thing, I converted to boxed ints, etc. Haven't converted the macro tests yet. Not sure what to do there. | ||||
| 2011-08-03 | Remove all xfail-stage0 directives | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0. | ||||
| 2011-07-27 | Reformat for new syntax | Marijn Haverbeke | -6/+1 | |
| 2011-07-05 | Handle fail inside a for-each loop properly | Tim Chevalier | -0/+7 | |
