rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2011-08-31	Replace xfail-stageN with simply xfail-test	Marijn Haverbeke	-3/+1
	Closes #799
2011-08-31	Revert "Replace xfail-stageN with simply xfail-test"	Marijn Haverbeke	-1/+3
	This reverts commit 574194f6bcfb90b9f8486002b83babc4c21208c0.
2011-08-31	Replace xfail-stageN with simply xfail-test	Marijn Haverbeke	-3/+1
	Closes #799
2011-08-03	Remove all xfail-stage0 directives	Brian Anderson	-4/+0
	While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27	Reformat for new syntax	Marijn Haverbeke	-2/+2

2011-07-22	Add xfail-stage3 directives to tests	Brian Anderson	-0/+1
	The new test runners run stage 3
2011-06-15	Reformat source tree (minus a couple tests that are still grumpy).	Graydon Hoare	-15/+16

2011-05-14	Remove xfail-boot lines from tests	Brian Anderson	-2/+0

2011-05-03	Assume xfail-stage0 implies stage1 and stage2 in tests, for now.	Graydon Hoare	-0/+2

2011-05-02	Un-revert "Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestate", fixing ↵	Patrick Walton	-4/+4
	the problem. This reverts commit d08b443fffb1181d8d45ae5d061412f202dd4118.
2011-05-02	Revert "Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestate"	Graydon Hoare	-4/+4
	This reverts commit aa25f22f197682de3b18fc4c8ba068d1feda220f. It broke stage2, not sure why yet.
2011-05-02	Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestate	Tim Chevalier	-4/+4
	This giant commit changes the syntax of Rust to use "assert" for "check" expressions that didn't mean anything to the typestate system, and continue using "check" for checks that are used as part of typestate checking. Most of the changes are just replacing "check" with "assert" in test cases and rustc.
2011-03-25	Switch xfail system to use comments embedded in source files.	Graydon Hoare	-0/+3

2010-06-23	Populate tree.	Graydon Hoare	-0/+21