rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2018-12-25	Remove licenses	Mark Rousskov	-10/+0

2015-06-17	Fallout in tests and docs from feature renamings	Alex Crichton	-2/+2

2015-06-13	Use `assert_eq!` instead of `assert!` in tests	petrochenkov	-10/+10

2015-04-08	Remove pretty-expanded from failing tests	Alex Crichton	-1/+0
	This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic! one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
2015-03-23	rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded	Brian Anderson	-0/+2
	Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2015-03-23	Require feature attributes, and add them where necessary	Brian Anderson	-1/+1

2015-03-13	fix tests	Oliver Schneider	-9/+10

2015-03-13	slice::from_raw_parts is preferred over transmuting a fresh raw::Slice	Oliver Schneider	-2/+2

2015-03-05	Remove integer suffixes where the types in compiled code are identical.	Eduard Burtescu	-3/+1

2015-03-03	Add `: Box<_>` or `::Box<_>` type annotations to various places.	Felix S. Klock II	-3/+4
	This is the kind of change that one is expected to need to make to accommodate overloaded-`box`. ---- Note that this is not all of the changes necessary to accommodate Issue 22181. It is merely the subset of those cases where there was already a let-binding in place that made it easy to add the necesasry type ascription. (For unnamed intermediate `Box` values, one must go down a different route; `Box::new` is the option that maximizes portability, but has potential inefficiency depending on whether the call is inlined.) ---- There is one place worth note, `run-pass/coerce-match.rs`, where I used an ugly form of `Box<_>` type ascription where I would have preferred to use `Box::new` to accommodate overloaded-`box`. I deliberately did not use `Box::new` here, because that is already done in coerce-match-calls.rs. ---- Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
2015-01-08	fallout: run-pass tests that use box. (many could be ported to `Box::new` ↵	Felix S. Klock II	-0/+3
	instead in the future.)
2014-12-20	Allow use of `[_ ; n]` syntax for fixed length and repeating arrays.	Nick Cameron	-2/+2
	This does NOT break any existing programs because the `[_, ..n]` syntax is also supported.
2014-09-12	Handle always-unsized structs	Nick Cameron	-0/+101
	closes #16977