| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
An automated script was run against the `.rs` and `.md` files,
subsituting every occurrence of `task` with `thread`. In the `.rs`
files, only the texts in the comment blocks were affected.
|
|
|
|
use visible characters for the multibyte character filler.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs
|
|
Conflicts:
src/test/run-pass/task-stderr.rs
|
|
|
|
This is an implementation of [RFC 1030][rfc] which adds these traits to the
prelude and additionally removes all inherent `into_iter` methods on collections
in favor of the trait implementation (which is now accessible by default).
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1030
This is technically a breaking change due to the prelude additions and removal
of inherent methods, but it is expected that essentially no code breaks in
practice.
[breaking-change]
Closes #24538
|
|
|
|
|
|
closes #24434
This PR changes executes `syntax::config::strip_unconfigured_items` before `syntax::feature_gate::check_crate_macros(sess.codemap()`. As far as I know, `strip_unconfigured_items` should be independent of `check_crate_macros`.
|
|
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
It was an oversight that this was not done in the great int upheaval.
[breaking-change]
|
|
It was an oversight that this was not done in the great int upheaval.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
`s/([^\(\s]+\.)len\(\) [(?:!=)>] 0/!$1is_empty()/g`
|
|
`s/(?<!\{ self)(?<=\.)len\(\) == 0/is_empty()/g`
|
|
|
|
closes #24434
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libstd/thread/mod.rs
src/test/bench/shootout-mandelbrot.rs
src/test/bench/shootout-reverse-complement.rs
src/test/run-pass/capturing-logging.rs
src/test/run-pass/issue-9396.rs
src/test/run-pass/tcp-accept-stress.rs
src/test/run-pass/tcp-connect-timeouts.rs
src/test/run-pass/tempfile.rs
|
|
Fixes #20596 by making `Debug` render negative zero with a `-` without affecting the behavior of `Display`.
While I was at it, I also removed some dead code from `float_to_str_bytes_common` (the one from `libcore/fmt/float.rs`, not the function of the same name in `libstd/num/strconv.rs`). It had support for different bases, and for negative numbers, but the function is internal to core and the couple places that call it (all in `libcore/fmt/mod.rs`) never use those features: They pass in `num.abs()` and base 10.
|
|
Fixes #24353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #22953.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #24353
|
|
Now that the internals of `format_args!` are unstable, tests that use it
don't compile after pretty-printing (unless they also declare the necessary
feature).
|
|
|
|
Closes #16602
|
|
We provide tools to tell what exact symbols to emit for any fn or static, but
don’t quite check if that won’t cause any issues later on. Some of the issues
include LLVM mangling our names again and our names pointing to wrong locations,
us generating dumb foreign call wrappers, linker errors, extern functions
resolving to different symbols altogether (`extern {fn fail();} fail();` in some
cases calling `fail1()`), etc.
Before the commit we had a function called `note_unique_llvm_symbol`, so it is
clear somebody was aware of the issue at some point, but the function was barely
used, mostly in irrelevant locations.
Along with working on it I took liberty to start refactoring trans/base into
a few smaller modules. The refactoring is incomplete and I hope I will find some
motivation to carry on with it.
This is possibly a [breaking-change] because it makes dumbly written code
properly invalid.
This fixes all those issues about incorrect use of #[no_mangle] being not reported/misreported/ICEd by the compiler.
NB. This PR does not attempt to tackle the parallel codegen issue that was mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/22811, but I believe it should be very straightforward in a follow up PR by modifying `trans::declare::get_defined_value` to look at all the contexts.
cc @alexcrichton @huonw @nrc because you commented on the original RFC issue.
EDIT: wow, this became much bigger than I initially intended.
|
|
Closes #19097
|
|
A pair of regression tests for issues that seem to have been fixed since they were originally filed.
|
|
Statement macros are now treated somewhat like item macros, in that a statement macro can now expand into a series of statements, rather than just a single statement.
This allows statement macros to be nested inside other kinds of macros and expand properly, where previously the expansion would only work when no nesting was present.
See:
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-stmt_macro_in_expr_macro.rs`
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-nested_stmt_macro.rs`
This changes the interface of the MacResult trait. make_stmt has become make_stmts and now returns a vector, rather than a single item. Plugin writers who were implementing MacResult will have breakage, as well as anyone using MacEager::stmt.
See:
- `src/libsyntax/ext/base.rs`
This also causes a minor difference in behavior to the diagnostics produced by certain malformed macros.
See:
- `src/test/compile-fail/macro-incomplete-parse.rs`
|
|
Closes #16602
|
|
Make `Box<Any + Send>` implement `Debug`.
Fixes #21291
|
|
This pads out the printing of pointers to their native width.
Extracted from and rebased on top of #24144
|
|
Use `discriminant_value` intrinsic for `derive(PartialOrd)`
[breaking-change]
This is a [breaking-change] because it can change the result of comparison operators when enum discriminants have been explicitly assigned. Notably in a case like:
```rust
#[derive(PartialOrd)]
enum E { A = 2, B = 1}
```
Under the old deriving, `A < B` held, because `A` came before `B` in the order of declaration. But now we use the ordering according to the provided values, and thus `A > B`. (However, this change is very unlikely to break much, if any, code, since the orderings themselves should all remain well-defined, total, etc.)
Fix #15523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #21486
|
|
Fix #21400.
|
|
|
|
The logic for only closing file descriptors >= 3 was inherited from quite some
time ago and ends up meaning that some internal APIs are less consistent than
they should be. By unconditionally closing everything entering a `FileDesc` we
ensure that we're consistent in our behavior as well as robustly handling the
stdio case.
|
|
|
|
|