rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2021-03-01	Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in.	Joshua Nelson	-1/+1
	- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2021-02-27	Move test file, add test of generated link	Lucas De Angelis	-0/+11

2021-02-15	Fix intra-doc link to raw pointer method	Simon Sapin	-0/+1
	CC https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80181
2021-01-17	Feature-gate `pointer` and `reference` in intra-doc links	Joshua Nelson	-0/+1
	- Only feature gate associated items - Add docs to unstable book
2021-01-12	Rollup merge of #80885 - camelid:intra-doc-str-ref, r=jyn514	Yuki Okushi	-0/+9
	rustdoc: Resolve `&str` as `str` People almost always are referring to `&str`, not `str`, so this will save a manual link resolve in many cases. Note that we already accept `&` (resolves to `reference`) in intra-doc links, so this shouldn't cause breakage. r? `@jyn514`
2021-01-10	rustdoc: Remove `*` intra-doc alias for `pointer`	Camelid	-2/+0
	It's not valid Rust code and it can easily be confused with a wildcard glob pattern or something else. People can always use `pointer` instead, so it's just removing an alias. It hasn't hit stable yet (I think it's still on nightly), so it's okay to remove it. (We can always add it back later if we change our mind too.)
2021-01-10	rustdoc: Resolve `&str` as `str`	Camelid	-0/+9
	People almost always are referring to `&str`, not `str`, so this will save a manual link resolve in many cases. Note that we already accept `&` (resolves to `reference`) in intra-doc links, so this shouldn't cause breakage.
2021-01-04	fix incompatible disambiguator test	max-heller	-2/+0

2021-01-03	primitive disambiguator tests	max-heller	-0/+6

2020-12-24	Don't process `[]` and `()` in intra-doc links	Joshua Nelson	-27/+0
	These caused several false positives when documenting rustc, which means there will likely be many more false positives in the rest of the ecosystem.
2020-12-22	Fix intra-doc links for non-path primitives	Joshua Nelson	-0/+66
	This does not currently work for associated items that are auto-implemented by the compiler (e.g. `never::eq`), because they aren't present in the source code. I plan to fix this in a follow-up PR.
2020-12-02	Use `item_name` instead of pretty printing	Joshua Nelson	-0/+13
	Pretty printing would add a `r#` prefix to raw identifiers, which was not correct. In general I think this change makes sense - pretty-printing is for showing to the user, `item_name` is suitable to pass to resolve.
2020-11-28	Move `src/test/rustdoc` intra-doc link tests into a subdirectory	Joshua Nelson	-0/+1088
	They were starting to get unwieldy.