| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
r=QuietMisdreavus
Hide default impls items
Follow up of #51885.
Fixes #54025.
cc @Mark-Simulacrum
r? @QuietMisdreavus
And screenshots of course:
<img width="1440" alt="screen shot 2018-09-12 at 23 30 35" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/45454424-1ff8d500-b6e4-11e8-9257-030322495d58.png">
<img width="1440" alt="screen shot 2018-09-12 at 23 30 42" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/45454431-2424f280-b6e4-11e8-8d65-db0d85ac18f0.png">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't want to render default item docs but previously
`doctraititem` naively delegated to the trait definition in those
cases.
Updated tests to also check that this doesn't strip default item
docs from the trait definition.
|
|
In `test/rustdoc/manual_impl.rs` there are now three structs:
* S1 implements and documents required method `a_method`.
* S2 implements and documents `a_method` as well as provided
method `b_method`.
* S3 implements `a_method` and `b_method`, but only documents
`b_method`.
For a struct, we want the rendered trait impls to include documentation
if and only if it appears on the trait implementation itself
(since users can just go to the trait definition for anything not
covered in the impl docs). This means we expect:
* S1, S2, and S3 to all include top-level trait impl docs.
* S1, S2, and S3 to exclude all trait definition docs.
* S1 to show impl docs for `a_method`.
* S2 to show impl docs for `a_method` and `b_method`.
* S3 to show impl docs for `b_method`.
These tests cover those cases.
|
|
Add test to check this resolves #24838 and #26871.
|
