| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add suggestion to use the `async_recursion` crate
Closes #81907
CC `@estebank`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Ashley Mannix <kodraus@hey.com>
|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
Add long explanation e0521
Helps with #61137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 2
All tests with a score equal or greater than 1.0 were moved to their respective directories by issuing
```bash
cat FILE | tr -s " " | tr -d '():' | sort -k3 | awk '$3 >= 1' | cut -d " " -f1-2 | sed 's;\\;/;g' | xargs -n2 git mv
```
**Observation**: The first column values is the only column with results greater zero
To attest the confidentiality of the model, some manual revision of at least of tests is needed and this process will be tracked in the following list:
* `src/test/ui/abi/issue-28676.rs` OK #28676
* `src/test/ui/array-slice-vec/issue-15730.rs` OK
* `src/test/ui/associated-types/issue-24338.rs` OK #54823
* `src/test/ui/associated-types/issue-48551.rs` Looks OK #48551
* `src/test/ui/associated-types/issue-50301.rs` Looks OK #63577
...
cc #73494
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Address comments
Update limits
|
|
Explain why borrows can't be held across yield point in async blocks
For https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78938.
|
|
Update tests of "unused_lifetimes" lint for async functions and corresponding source code
Before this PR the following code would cause an error:
```
#![deny(unused_lifetimes)]
async fn f<'a>(_: &'a i32) {}
fn main() {}
```
It was happening because of the desugaring of return type in async functions. As a result of the desugaring, the return type contains all lifetimes involved in the function signature. And these lifetimes were interpreted separately from the same in the function scope => so they are unused.
Now, all lifetimes from the return type are interpreted as used. It is also not perfect, but at least this lint doesn't cause wrong errors now.
This PR connected to issues #78522, #77217
|
|
|
|
Rework diagnostics for wrong number of generic args (fixes #66228 and #71924)
This PR reworks the `wrong number of {} arguments` message, so that it provides more details and contextual hints.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Esteban Kuber <estebank@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Suggest async {} for async || {}
Fixes #76011
This adds support for adding help diagnostics to the feature gating checks and
then uses it for the async_closure gate to add the extra bit of help
information as described in the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix whitespace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #75785
When displaying a MIR borrowcheck error, we may need to find an upper
bound for a region, which gives us a region to point to in the error
message. However, a region might outlive multiple distinct universal
regions, in which case the only upper bound is 'static
To try to display a meaningful error message, we compute an
'approximate' upper bound by picking one of the universal regions.
Currently, we pick the region with the lowest index - however, this
caused us to produce a suboptimal error message in issue #75785
This PR `approx_universal_upper_bound` to prefer regions with an
`external_name`. This causes us to prefer regions from function
arguments/upvars, which seems to lead to a nicer error message in some
cases.
|
|
corresponding source code
|
|
|
|
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
|
|
Make it more clear what an about async fn's returns when referring to what it returns
see #76547
This is *likely* not the ONLY place that this happens to be unclear, but we can move this fn to rustc_middle or something like that and reuse it if need be, to apply it to more diagnostics
One outstanding question I have is, if the fn returns (), should I make the message more clear (what about `fn f()` vs `fn f() -> ()`, can you tell those apart in the hir?)
R? `@tmandry`
`@rustbot` modify labels +A-diagnostics +T-compiler
|
|
Improve lifetime name annotations for closures & async functions
* Don't refer to async functions as "generators" in error output
* Where possible, emit annotations pointing exactly at the `&` in the return type of closures (when they have explicit return types) and async functions, like we do for arguments.
Addresses #74072, but I wouldn't call that *closed* until annotations are identical for async and non-async functions.
* Emit a better annotation when the lifetime doesn't appear in the full name type, which currently happens for opaque types like `impl Future`. Addresses #74497, but further improves could probably be made (why *doesn't* it appear in the type as `impl Future + '1`?)
This is included in the same PR because the changes to `give_name_if_anonymous_region_appears_in_output` would introduce ICE otherwise (it would return `None` in cases where it didn't previously, which then gets `unwrap`ped)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggest calling await on method call and field access
When encountering a failing method or field resolution on a `Future`,
look at the `Output` and try the same operation on it. If successful,
suggest calling `.await` on the `Future`.
This had already been introduced in #72784, but at some point they
stopped working.
Built on top of #78214, only last commit is relevant.
r? @oli-obk
|
|
|
|
When encountering a failing method or field resolution on a `Future`,
look at the `Output` and try the same operation on it. If successful,
suggest calling `.await` on the `Future`.
This had already been introduced in #72784, but at some point they
stopped working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These need to only be bounds to avoid cycle errors in trait checking.
|
|
|
