| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Tests around moving parts of structs and tuples across await points
r? cramertj
Per the [dropbox paper](https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/async.await-Call-for-Tests--AiR3vlp1s_Kw0yzWZ1sWMnaIAQ-nMyZGrra7dz9KcFRMLKJy) about more tests, it appears there are some tests wanted around local variables (under the section ["Dynamic semantics"](https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/async.await-Call-for-Tests--AiR3vlp1s_Kw0yzWZ1sWMnaIAg-nMyZGrra7dz9KcFRMLKJy#:uid=122335511260129643493892&h2=Dynamic-semantics)). Here is one commit, and I can probably get code up for other scenarios listed there, although I may not have the full background to know what is being targeted by the tests. Please assist me if I'm off course, thanks!
---
- Executed all 4 new tests
- Executed `tidy` command
|
|
tests for async/await drop order
This is just me helping out with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62121 where I can.
I'm also going to use this as a public place to collect my thoughts about what has already been done and what hasn't (adding comments to the dropbox paper doc was quickly getting spammy).
I've tried to keep my commit messages similar to the line items on https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/async.await-Call-for-Tests--AiKouT0L41mSnK1741s~TiiRAg-nMyZGrra7dz9KcFRMLKJy as possible.
A bunch of my tests are likely to be either redundant with other tests, or lower quality than other tests that people are writing. A reasonable approach might be to tell me which commits you want to keep and I'll throw away the rest of them.
The part from the dropbox paper doc that I'm concentrating on here is:
(items marked with `?` are ones that I can't immediately think of how to test, so I will leave for other people. Items with checkboxes are things that I have done or will try to do next)
### Dynamic semantics
- `async`/`await` with unusual locals:
- ? partially uninhabited
- ? conditionally initialized
- ~drop impls~ already done in src/test/ui/async-await/drop-order/*
- ? nested drop impls
- ~partially moved (e.g., `let x = (vec![], vec![]); drop(x.0); foo.await; drop(x.1);`)~ see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63310
- Control flow:
- basic
- complex
- [x] `.await` while holding variables of different sizes
- (possibly) drop order
- [x] including drop order for locals when a future is dropped part-way through execution
- Parameters' drop order is covered in my commit f40190a
- ~An async fn version of `dynamic-drop.rs`~
- already done by matthewjasper in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62193/files
- ? interaction with const eval, promoteds, and temporaries
- [x] drop the resulting future and check that local variables and parameters are dropped in the expected order (interaction with cancellation, in other words)
- also in f40190a
Explanation of commits:
* 0a1bdd4 is the simplest place I could think of to explicitly test `.await` while holding variables of different sizes. I'm pretty sure that this will end up being redundant with something else, so I'm happy to drop it.
* f40190a is a copy-paste from `drop-order-for-async-fn-parameters.rs` with `NeverReady.await` dumped on the end of each testcase.
* Normally I don't like copy-paste-based tests, but `drop-order-for-async-fn-parameters-by-ref-binding.rs` is also copy-paste, so I thought it might be okay.
* [x] I'm a bit sad that this doesn't cover non-parameter locals, but I think it should be easy enough to extend in that direction, so I might have a crack at that tomorrow.
* c4940e0f90 makes a bunch of local variables and moves them into either `{}` blocks or `async move {}` blocks, checking for any surprising differences.
* I have tried to give the test functions descriptive names
* I have not duplicated the tests for methods with/without self.
* I think that all of these tests could be rewritten to be clearer if I could write down the expected drop order next to each test.
|
|
Fix generator size regressions due to optimization
I tested the generator optimizations in #60187 and #61922 on the Fuchsia
build, and noticed that some small generators (about 8% of the async fns
in our build) increased in size slightly.
This is because in #60187 we split the fields into two groups, a
"prefix" non-overlap region and an overlap region, and lay them out
separately. This can introduce unnecessary padding bytes between the two
groups.
In every single case in the Fuchsia build, it was due to there being
only a single variant being used in the overlap region. This means that
we aren't doing any overlapping, period. So it's better to combine the
two regions into one and lay out all the fields at once, which is what
this change does.
r? @cramertj
cc @eddyb @Zoxc
|
|
|
|
through execution
|
|
Make use of possibly uninitialized data [E0381] a hard error
This is one of the behaviors we no longer allow in NLL. Since it can
lead to undefined behavior, I think it's definitely worth making it a
hard error without waiting to turn off migration mode (#58781).
Closes #60450.
My ulterior motive here is making it impossible to leave variables
partially initialized across a yield (see #60889, discussion at #63035), so
tests are included for that.
cc #54987
---
I'm not sure if bypassing the buffer is a good way of doing this. We could also make a `force_errors_buffer` or similar that gets recombined with all the errors as they are emitted. But this is simpler and seems fine to me.
r? @Centril
cc @cramertj @nikomatsakis @pnkfelix @RalfJung
|
|
|
|
This is one of the behaviors we no longer allow in NLL. Since it can
lead to undefined behavior, I think it's definitely worth making it a
hard error without waiting to turn off migration mode (#58781).
Closes #60450.
My ulterior motive here is making it impossible to leave variables
partially initialized across a yield (see discussion at #63035), so
tests are included for that.
|
|
execution
|
|
|
|
Change opaque type syntax from `existential type` to type alias `impl Trait`
This implements a new feature gate `type_alias_impl_trait` (this is slightly different from the originally proposed feature name, but matches what has been used in discussion since), deprecating the old `existential_types` feature.
The syntax for opaque types has been changed. In addition, the "existential" terminology has been replaced with "opaque", as per previous discussion and the RFC.
This makes partial progress towards implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63063.
r? @Centril
|
|
Round generator sizes to a multiple of their alignment
Fixes #62658.
r? @cramertj
cc @eddyb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #62658.
|
|
|
|
This prevents uninhabited fields from "infecting" the abi and
largest_niche of the generator layout.
This fixes a latent bug, where an uninhabited field could be promoted to
the generator prefix and cause the entire generator to become
uninhabited.
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
|
|
Self-referencial type now called a recursive type
As per Boat's suggestion - #62539, this makes the error message clearer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Mazdak Farrokhzad <twingoow@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move async-await tests from run-pass to ui
fix #62236
r? @Centril
|
|
The sizes for wasm are different.
Co-Authored-By: Tyler Mandry <tmandry@gmail.com>
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #62417 (Fix ICEs when `Self` is used in type aliases)
- #62450 (Raise the default recursion limit to 128)
- #62470 (Prevent shrinking of "crate select" element on Firefox)
- #62515 (cli: make help output for -l and -L consistent)
- #62520 (Regression test for issue 42574.)
- #62526 (normalize use of backticks in compiler messages for libsyntax/feature_gate.rs)
- #62527 (clarify that debug_assert does not completely omits the code)
- #62535 (ci: Configure $CI_JOB_NAME correctly)
- #62541 (Add spastorino for rustc-guide toolstate)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
|
|
Normalize projections appearing in `impl Trait`
Fixes #60414
This does not try to do the same for `existential type`s (which have the same bug), since that always seems to lead to cycle errors.
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60532
|
|
|
|
|
|
The auxiliary file arc_wake.rs is in run-pass/auxiliary and also
ui/async-await/auxiliary. Remove the former one as their contents
are same.
Move run-pass/futures-api.rs to ui/async-await/futures-api.rs as it
needs to use arc_wake.rs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Break out of the correct number of scopes in loops
We were incorrectly breaking out of one too many drop scopes when
generating MIR for loops and breakable blocks, resulting in use after
free and associated borrow checker warnings.
This wasn't noticed because the scope that we're breaking out of twice
is only used for temporaries that are created for adjustments applied to
the loop. Since loops generally propagate coercions to the `break`
expressions, the only case we see this is when the type of the loop is a
smart pointer to a trait object.
Closes #62312
|
|
Improve error span for async type inference error
Fixes #62382
Previously, we would point at the spawn of the 'await' expression,
instead of the actual expression with an unknown type.
|
|
Reduce reliance on `await!(...)` macro
Only the last commit is new.
r? @cramertj
|
|
Move `async || ...` closures into `#![feature(async_closure)]`
The `async || expr` syntax is moved out from `#![feature(async_await)]` into its own gate `#![feature(async_closure)]`.
New tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62290
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62214.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62149
r? @varkor
|
|
We were incorrectly breaking out of one too many drop scopes when
generating MIR for loops and breakable blocks, resulting in use after
free and associated borrow checker warnings.
This wasn't noticed because the scope that we're breaking out of twice
is only used for temporaries that are created for adjustments applied to
the loop. Since loops generally propagate coercions to the `break`
expressions, the only case we see this is when the type of the loop is a
smart pointer to a trait object.
|
|
Fixes #62382
Previously, we would point at the spawn of the 'await' expression,
instead of the actual expression with an unknown type.
|
|
Migrate `compile-pass` annotations to `build-pass`
This is a part of #62277.
As a first step, the `compile-pass` tests are migrated to `build-pass`.
r? @cramertj
cc @Centril
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|