| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
regression for issue 90847
Adds a regression test for issue #90847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit e7cc3bddbe0d0e374d05e7003e662bba1742dbae, reversing
changes made to 734368a200904ef9c21db86c595dc04263c87be0.
|
|
|
|
Lazy type-alias-impl-trait
Previously opaque types were processed by
1. replacing all mentions of them with inference variables
2. memorizing these inference variables in a side-table
3. at the end of typeck, resolve the inference variables in the side table and use the resolved type as the hidden type of the opaque type
This worked okayish for `impl Trait` in return position, but required lots of roundabout type inference hacks and processing.
This PR instead stops this process of replacing opaque types with inference variables, and just keeps the opaque types around.
Whenever an opaque type `O` is compared with another type `T`, we make the comparison succeed and record `T` as the hidden type. If `O` is compared to `U` while there is a recorded hidden type for it, we grab the recorded type (`T`) and compare that against `U`. This makes implementing
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2515
much simpler (previous attempts on the inference based scheme were very prone to ICEs and general misbehaviour that was not explainable except by random implementation defined oddities).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
fixes #93411
fixes #88236
|
|
|
|
by using an opaque type obligation to bubble up comparisons between opaque types and other types
Also uses proper obligation causes so that the body id works, because out of some reason nll uses body ids for logic instead of just diagnostics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve `_` constants in item signature handling
removing the "type" from the error messages does slightly worsen the error messages for types, but figuring out whether the placeholder is for a type or a constant and correctly dealing with that seemed fairly difficult to me so I took the easy way out :sparkles: Imo the error message is still clear enough.
r? `@BoxyUwU` cc `@estebank`
|
|
Directly use ConstValue for single literals in blocks
Addresses the minimal repro in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92186, but doesn't fix the underlying problem (which would be solved by solving the anon subst problem afaict).
I do, however, think that it makes sense in general to treat single literals in anon blocks as const values directly, especially in light of the problem that the issue refers to (anon const evaluation being postponed until infer variables in substs can be resolved, which was introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90023), i.e. while we do get warnings for those unnecessary braces, we should try to avoid errors caused by those braces if possible.
|
|
|
|
allow eq constraints on associated constants
Updates #70256
(cc `@varkor,` `@Centril)`
|
|
Fix ICEs related to `Deref<Target=[T; N]>` on newtypes
1. Stash a const infer's type into the canonical var during canonicalization, so we can recreate the fresh const infer with that same type.
For example, given `[T; _]` we know `_` is a `usize`. If we go from infer => canonical => infer, we shouldn't forget that variable is a usize.
Fixes #92626
Fixes #83704
2. Don't stash the autoderef'd slice type that we get from method lookup, but instead recreate it during method confirmation. We need to do this because the type we receive back after picking the method references a type variable that does not exist after probing is done.
Fixes #92637
... A better solution for the second issue would be to actually _properly_ implement `Deref` for `[T; N]` instead of fixing this autoderef hack to stop leaking inference variables. But I actually looked into this, and there are many complications with const impls.
|
|
Also prevent ICE when adding a const in associated const equality.
|
|
ProjectionPredicate should be able to handle both associated types and consts so this adds the
first step of that. It mainly just pipes types all the way down, not entirely sure how to handle
consts, but hopefully that'll come with time.
|
|
|
|
r=nagisa
Fix suggesting turbofish with lifetime arguments
Now we suggest turbofish correctly given exprs like `foo<'_>`.
Also fix suggestion when we have `let x = foo<bar, baz>;` which was broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow `_` as the length of array types and repeat expressions
r? `@BoxyUwU` cc `@varkor`
|
|
Relax priv-in-pub lint on generic bounds and where clauses of trait impls.
The priv-in-pub lint is a legacy mechanism of the compiler, supplanted by a reachability-based [type privacy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2145-type-privacy.md) analysis. This PR does **not** relax type privacy; it only relaxes the lint (as proposed by the type privacy RFC) in the case of trait impls.
## Current Behavior
On public trait impls, it's currently an **error** to have a `where` bound constraining a private type with a trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
struct Priv {}
impl Trait for Priv {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Priv: Trait // ERROR
{}
```
...and it's a **warning** to have have a public type constrained by a private trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
pub struct Pub {}
trait Priv {}
impl Priv for Pub {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Pub: Priv // WARNING
{}
```
This lint applies to `where` clauses in other contexts, too; e.g. on free functions:
```rust
struct Priv<T>(T);
pub trait Pub {}
impl<T: Pub> Pub for Priv<T> {}
pub fn function<T>()
where
Priv<T>: Pub // WARNING
{}
```
**These constraints could be relaxed without issue.**
## New Behavior
This lint is relaxed for `where` clauses on trait impls, such that it's okay to have a `where` bound constraining a private type with a trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
struct Priv {}
impl Trait for Priv {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Priv: Trait // OK
{}
```
...and it's okay to have a public type constrained by a private trait:
```rust
pub trait Trait {}
pub struct Type {}
pub struct Pub {}
trait Priv {}
impl Priv for Pub {}
impl Trait for Type
where
Pub: Priv // OK
{}
```
## Rationale
While the priv-in-pub lint is not essential for soundness, it *can* help programmers avoid pitfalls that would make their libraries difficult to use by others. For instance, such a lint *is* useful for free functions; e.g. if a downstream crate tries to call the `function` in the previous snippet in a generic context:
```rust
fn callsite<T>()
where
Priv<T>: Pub // ERROR: omitting this bound is a compile error, but including it is too
{
function::<T>()
}
```
...it cannot do so without repeating `function`'s `where` bound, which we cannot do because `Priv` is out-of-scope. A lint for this case is arguably helpful.
However, this same reasoning **doesn't** hold for trait impls. To call an unconstrained method on a public trait impl with private bounds, you don't need to forward those private bounds, you can forward the public trait:
```rust
mod upstream {
pub trait Trait {
fn method(&self) {}
}
pub struct Type<T>(T);
pub struct Pub<T>(T);
trait Priv {}
impl<T: Priv> Priv for Pub<T> {}
impl<T> Trait for Type<T>
where
Pub<T>: Priv // WARNING
{}
}
mod downstream {
use super::upstream::*;
fn function<T>(value: Type<T>)
where
Type<T>: Trait // <- no private deets!
{
value.method();
}
}
```
**This PR only eliminates the lint on trait impls.** It leaves it intact for all other contexts, including trait definitions, inherent impls, and function definitions. It doesn't need to exist in those cases either, but I figured I'd first target a case where it's mostly pointless.
## Other Notes
- See discussion [on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/relax.20priv-in-pub.20lint.20for.20trait.20impl.20.60where.60.20bounds/near/222458397).
- This PR effectively reverts #79291.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lint bare traits in AstConv.
Removing the lint from lowering allows to:
- make lowering querification easier;
- have the lint implementation in only one place.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilise `feature(const_generics_defaults)`
`feature(const_generics_defaults)` is complete implementation wise and has a pretty extensive test suite so I think is ready for stabilisation.
needs stabilisation report and maybe an RFC :sweat_smile:
r? `@lcnr`
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-generics`
|
|
Tweak assoc type obligation spans
* Point at RHS of associated type in obligation span
* Point at `impl` assoc type on projection error
* Reduce verbosity of recursive obligations
* Point at source of binding lifetime obligation
* Tweak "required bound" note
* Tweak "expected... found opaque (return) type" labels
* Point at set type in impl assoc type WF errors
r? `@oli-obk`
This is a(n uncontroversial) subset of #85799.
|
|
* Point at RHS of associated type in obligation span
* Point at `impl` assoc type on projection error
* Reduce verbosity of recursive obligations
* Point at source of binding lifetime obligation
* Tweak "required bound" note
* Tweak "expected... found opaque (return) type" labels
* Point at set type in impl assoc type WF errors
|
|
Add tests fixed by #90023
The following issues were fixed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90023
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79674
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83765
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86033
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90318
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88468
The following issues were duplicates of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90654
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86850
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89022
r? ````@jackh726````
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow for failure of subst_normalize_erasing_regions in const_eval
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72845
Using associated types that cannot be normalized previously resulted in an ICE. We now allow for normalization failure and return a "TooGeneric" error in that case.
r? ```@RalfJung``` maybe?
|
|
|
|
When the value of a const param isn't inferred, replace it with the
param name from the definition.
|
|
When we point at a binding to suggest giving it a type, erase all the
type for ADTs that have been resolved, leaving only the ones that could
not be inferred. For small shallow types this is not a problem, but for
big nested types with lots of params, this can otherwise cause a lot of
unnecessary visual output.
|
|
Pretty print empty blocks as {}
**Example:**
```rust
macro_rules! p {
($e:expr) => {
println!("{}", stringify!($e));
};
($i:item) => {
println!("{}", stringify!($i));
};
}
fn main() {
p!(if true {});
p!(struct S {});
}
```
**Before:**
```console
if true { }
struct S {
}
```
**After:**
```console
if true {}
struct S {}
```
This affects [`dbg!`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.dbg.html), as well as ecosystem uses of stringify such as in [`anyhow::ensure!`](https://docs.rs/anyhow/1/anyhow/macro.ensure.html). Printing a `{ }` in today's heavily rustfmt'd world comes out looking jarring/sloppy.
|
|
Skip reborrows in AbstractConstBuilder
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90455
Temporary fix to prevent confusing diagnostics that refer to implicit borrows and derefs until we allow borrows and derefs on constant expressions.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
