| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Fix `const_fn_trait_ref_impl`, add test for it
#99943 broke `#[feature(const_fn_trait_ref_impl)]`, this PR fixes this and adds a test for it.
r? ````@fee1-dead````
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spans are independent of the body being borrow-checked, so they don't
need remapping when promoting type-tests and they yield more specific
error spans inside bodies of closures/inline consts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
|
|
Use correct location for type tests in promoted constants
Previously we forgot to remap the location in a type test collected when visiting the body of a promoted constant back to the usage location, causing an ICE when trying to get span information for that type test.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102117
|
|
Stabilize `half_open_range_patterns`
This PR stabilize `feature(half_open_range_patterns)`:
```
Allows using `..=X` as a pattern.
```
And adds a new `feature(half_open_range_patterns_in_slices)` for the slice part, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102275#issuecomment-1267422806.
The FCP was completed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67264.
|
|
add a few more assert_unsafe_precondition
Add debug-assertion checking for `ptr.read()`, `ptr.write(_)`, and `unreachable_unchecked.`
This is quite useful for [cargo-careful](https://github.com/RalfJung/cargo-careful).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do not reverse the expected type and found type for ObligationCauseCo…
…de of IfExpressionWithNoElse
this will fix #102397
|
|
IfExpressionWithNoElse
this will fix #102397
|
|
panic-on-uninit: adjust checks to 0x01-filling
Now that `mem::uninitiailized` actually fills memory with `0x01` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99182), we can make it panic in a few less cases without risking a lot more UB -- which hopefully slightly improves compatibility with some old code, and which might increase the chance that we can check inside arrays in the future.
We detect almost all of these with our lint, so authors of such code should still be warned -- but if this happens deep inside a dependency, the panic can be quite interruptive, so it might be better not to do it when there is no risk of LLVM UB. Therefore, adjust the `might_permit_raw_init` logic to care primarily about LLVM UB. To my knowledge, it actually covers all cases of LLVM UB now.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66151
Cc ``@5225225``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize bench_black_box
This PR stabilize `feature(bench_black_box)`.
```rust
pub fn black_box<T>(dummy: T) -> T;
```
The FCP was completed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64102.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
|
|
make invalid_value lint a bit smarter around enums
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102043
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add regression test
This adds a regression test for issue #100878.
Closes #100878.
|
|
Suggest Default::default() when binding isn't initialized
Fixes #102087
|
|
|
|
Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`
The FCP was completed in #71835.
Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same `const_btree_new` feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also
creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same
`const_btree_new` feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This corrects the `span_with_body` in the case of closures, which was
incorrectly shortened to the `def_span`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].
I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.
[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
|
|
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information
Next step in the reaction to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
= help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
= help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn is just impossible
The remaining "needs RFC" errors are just needlessly confusing, I think -- time to get rid of that error variant. They are anyway only reachable with miri-unleashed (if at all).
r? `@oli-obk`
|