| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This avoids creation of a terminating scope in
chains that contain both && and ||, because
also there we know that a terminating scope is
not neccessary: all the chain members are already
in such terminating scopes.
Also add a mixed && / || test.
|
|
Previously a short circuiting && chain would drop the
first element after all the other elements, and otherwise
follow evaluation order, so code like:
f(1).g() && f(2).g() && f(3).g() && f(4).g()
would drop the temporaries in the order 2,3,4,1. This made
&& and || non-associative regarding drop order, so
adding ()'s to the expression would change drop order:
f(1).g() && (f(2).g() && f(3).g()) && f(4).g()
for example would drop in the order 3,2,4,1.
As, except for the bool result, there is no data returned
by the sub-expressions of the short circuiting binops,
we can safely discard of any temporaries created by the
sub-expr. Previously, code was already putting the rhs's
into terminating scopes, but missed it for the lhs's.
This commit addresses this "twist". In the expression,
we now also put the lhs into a terminating scope.
The drop order for the above expressions is 1,2,3,4
now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drop temporaries created in a condition, even if it's a let chain
Fixes #100513.
During the lowering from AST to HIR we wrap expressions acting as conditions in a `DropTemps` expression so that any temporaries created in the condition are dropped after the condition is executed. Effectively this means we transform
```rust
if Some(1).is_some() { .. }
```
into (roughly)
```rust
if { let _t = Some(1).is_some(); _t } { .. }
```
so that if we create any temporaries, they're lifted into the new scope surrounding the condition, so for example something along the lines of
```rust
if { let temp = Some(1); let _t = temp.is_some(); _t }.
```
Before this PR, if the condition contained any let expressions we would not introduce that new scope, instead leaving the condition alone. This meant that in a let-chain like
```rust
if get_drop("first").is_some() && let None = get_drop("last") {
println!("second");
} else { .. }
```
the temporary created for `get_drop("first")` would be lifted into the _surrounding block_, which caused it to be dropped after the execution of the entire `if` expression.
After this PR, we wrap everything but the `let` expression in terminating scopes. The upside to this solution is that it's minimally invasive, but the downside is that in the worst case, an expression with `let` exprs interspersed like
```rust
if get_drop("first").is_some()
&& let Some(_a) = get_drop("fifth")
&& get_drop("second").is_some()
&& let Some(_b) = get_drop("fourth") { .. }
```
gets _multiple_ new scopes, roughly
```rust
if { let _t = get_drop("first").is_some(); _t }
&& let Some(_a) = get_drop("fifth")
&& { let _t = get_drop("second").is_some(); _t }
&& let Some(_b) = get_drop("fourth") { .. }
```
so instead of all of the temporaries being dropped at the end of the entire condition, they will be dropped right after they're evaluated (before the subsequent `let` expr). So while I'd say the drop behavior around let-chains is _less_ surprising after this PR, it still might not exactly match what people might expect.
For tests, I've just extended the drop order tests added in #100526. I'm not sure if that's the best way to go about it, though, so suggestions are welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the end of the condition's execution
|
|
|
|
Suggest Default::default() when binding isn't initialized
Fixes #102087
|
|
|
|
Note the type when unable to drop values in compile time
|
|
|
|
This test case actually requires std::process.
|
|
|
|
In #100513 it was shown that the drop behavior of let_chains is not correct
currently. Since drop behavior is something pretty subtle, this adds
explicit tests for the drop behavior of `if`, `if let` and `match` to
make sure that it does not regress in the future.
The `println!`s were left in to make debugging easier in case something
goes wrong, but they are not required for the test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a binding is declared without a value, borrowck verifies that all
codepaths have *one* assignment to them to initialize them fully. If
there are any cases where a condition can be met that leaves the binding
uninitialized or we attempt to initialize a field of an unitialized
binding, we emit E0381.
We now look at all the statements that initialize the binding, and use
them to explore branching code paths that *don't* and point at them. If
we find *no* potential places where an assignment to the binding might
be missing, we display the spans of all the existing initializers to
provide some context.
|
|
These are necessary for running the rustc test suite with cg_clif
|
|
|
|
This directive isn't automatically set by compiletest or x.py, but can
be turned on manually for targets that require it.
|
|
Mark places as initialized when mutably borrowed
Fixes the example in #90752, but does not handle some corner cases involving raw pointers and unsafe. See [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90752#issuecomment-965822895) for more information, or the second test.
Although I talked about both `MaybeUninitializedPlaces` and `MaybeInitializedPlaces` in #90752, this PR only changes the latter. That's because "maybe uninitialized" is the conservative choice, and marking them as definitely initialized (`!maybe_uninitialized`) when a mutable borrow is created could lead to problems if `addr_of_mut` to an uninitialized local is allowed. Additionally, places cannot become uninitialized via a mutable reference, so if a place is definitely initialized, taking a mutable reference to it should not change that.
I think it's correct to ignore interior mutability as nbdd0121 suggests below. Their analysis doesn't work inside of `core::cell`, which *does* have access to `UnsafeCell`'s field, but that won't be an issue unless we explicitly instantiate one with an `enum` within that module.
r? `@wesleywiser`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIR lowering for `if let` expressions is now more complicated now that
`if let` exists in HIR. This PR adds a scope for the variables bound in
an `if let` expression and then uses an approach similar to how we
handle loops to ensure that we reliably drop the correct variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 4fef39113a514bb270f5661a82fdba17d3e41dbb.
|
|
|
|
Address comments
Update limits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial implementation of `#![feature(move_ref_pattern)]`
Following up on #45600, under the gate `#![feature(move_ref_pattern)]`, `(ref x, mut y)` is allowed subject to restrictions necessary for soundness. The match checking implementation and tests for `#![feature(bindings_after_at)]` is also adjusted as necessary.
Closes #45600.
Tracking issue: #68354.
r? @matthewjasper
|
|
bindings_after_at: harden tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passes LLVM codegen and Emscripten link-time flags for exception
handling if and only if the panic strategy is `unwind`. Sets the
default panic strategy for Emscripten targets to `unwind`. Re-enables
tests that depend on unwinding support for Emscripten, including
`should_panic` tests.
|
