| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
when they don't
|
|
Address inconsistency in using "is" with "declared here"
"is" was generally used for NLL diagnostics, but not other diagnostics. Using "is" makes the diagnostics sound more natural and readable, so it seems sensible to commit to them throughout.
r? @Centril
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `#[repr(transparent)]` on `enum`s in Rust 1.42.0
# Stabilization report
The following is the stabilization report for `#![feature(transparent_enums)]`.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60405
[Version target](https://forge.rust-lang.org/#current-release-versions): 1.42 (2020-01-30 => beta, 2020-03-12 => stable).
## User guide
A `struct` with only a single non-ZST field (let's call it `foo`) can be marked as `#[repr(transparent)]`. Such a `struct` has the same layout and ABI as `foo`. Here, we also extend this ability to `enum`s with only one variant, subject to the same restrictions as for the equivalent `struct`. That is, you can now write:
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
enum Foo { Bar(u8) }
```
which, in terms of layout and ABI, is equivalent to:
```rust
#[repr(transparent)]
struct Foo(u8);
```
## Motivation
This is not a major feature that will unlock new and important use-cases. The utility of `repr(transparent)` `enum`s is indeed limited. However, there is still some value in it:
1. It provides conceptual simplification of the language in terms of treating univariant `enum`s and `struct`s the same, as both are product types. Indeed, languages like Haskell only have `data` as the only way to construct user-defined ADTs in the language.
2. In rare occasions, it might be that the user started out with a univariant `enum` for whatever reason (e.g. they thought they might extend it later). Now they want to make this `enum` `transparent` without breaking users by turning it into a `struct`. By lifting the restriction here, now they can.
## Technical specification
The reference specifies [`repr(transparent)` on a `struct`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/type-layout.html#the-transparent-representation) as:
> ### The transparent Representation
>
> The `transparent` representation can only be used on `struct`s that have:
> - a single field with non-zero size, and
> - any number of fields with size 0 and alignment 1 (e.g. `PhantomData<T>`).
>
> Structs with this representation have the same layout and ABI as the single non-zero sized field.
>
> This is different than the `C` representation because a struct with the `C` representation will always have the ABI of a `C` `struct` while, for example, a struct with the `transparent` representation with a primitive field will have the ABI of the primitive field.
>
> Because this representation delegates type layout to another type, it cannot be used with any other representation.
Here, we amend this to include univariant `enum`s as well with the same static restrictions and the same effects on dynamic semantics.
## Tests
All the relevant tests are adjusted in the PR diff but are recounted here:
- `src/test/ui/repr/repr-transparent.rs` checks that `repr(transparent)` on an `enum` must be univariant, rather than having zero or more than one variant. Restrictions on the fields inside the only variants, like for those on `struct`s, are also checked here.
- A number of codegen tests are provided as well:
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent.rs` (the canonical test)
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent-aggregates-1.rs`
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent-aggregates-2.rs`
- `src/test/codegen/repr-transparent-aggregates-3.rs`
- `src/test/ui/lint/lint-ctypes-enum.rs` tests the interactions with the `improper_ctypes` lint.
## History
- 2019-04-30, RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2645
Author: @mjbshaw
Reviewers: The Language Team
This is the RFC that proposes allowing `#[repr(transparent)]` on `enum`s and `union`.
- 2019-06-11, PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60463
Author: @mjbshaw
Reviewers: @varkor and @rkruppe
The PR implements the RFC aforementioned in full.
- 2019, PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67323
Author: @Centril
Reviewers: @davidtwco
The PR reorganizes the static checks taking advantage of the fact that `struct`s and `union`s are internally represented as ADTs with a single variant.
- This PR stabilizes `transparent_enums`.
## Related / possible future work
The remaining work here is to figure out the semantics of `#[repr(transparent)]` on `union`s and stabilize those. This work continues to be tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60405.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This doesn't mention that using an existing lifetime is possible, but
that would hopefully be clear as always being an option. The intention
of this is to teach newcomers what the lifetime syntax is.
|
|
|
|
Fix some issue numbers of unstable features
Looking into the unstable book, some issue numbers are outdated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
build-std compatible sanitizer support
### Motivation
When using `-Z sanitizer=*` feature it is essential that both user code and
standard library is instrumented. Otherwise the utility of sanitizer will be
limited, or its use will be impractical like in the case of memory sanitizer.
The recently introduced cargo feature build-std makes it possible to rebuild
standard library with arbitrary rustc flags. Unfortunately, those changes alone
do not make it easy to rebuild standard library with sanitizers, since runtimes
are dependencies of std that have to be build in specific environment,
generally not available outside rustbuild process. Additionally rebuilding them
requires presence of llvm-config and compiler-rt sources.
The goal of changes proposed here is to make it possible to avoid rebuilding
sanitizer runtimes when rebuilding the std, thus making it possible to
instrument standard library for use with sanitizer with simple, although
verbose command:
```
env CARGO_TARGET_X86_64_UNKNOWN_LINUX_GNU_RUSTFLAGS=-Zsanitizer=thread cargo test -Zbuild-std --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
```
### Implementation
* Sanitizer runtimes are no long packed into crates. Instead, libraries build
from compiler-rt are used as is, after renaming them into `librusc_rt.*`.
* rustc obtains runtimes from target libdir for default sysroot, so that
they are not required in custom build sysroots created with build-std.
* The runtimes are only linked-in into executables to address issue #64629.
(in previous design it was hard to avoid linking runtimes into static
libraries produced by rustc as demonstrated by sanitizer-staticlib-link
test, which still passes despite changes made in #64780).
cc @kennytm, @japaric, @firstyear, @choller
|
|
|
|
|
|
- remove syntax::{help!, span_help!, span_note!}
- remove unused syntax::{struct_span_fatal, struct_span_err_or_warn!, span_err_or_warn!}
- lintify check_for_bindings_named_same_as_variants + conflicting_repr_hints
- inline syntax::{struct_span_warn!, diagnostic_used!}
- stringify_error_code! -> error_code! & use it more.
- find_plugin_registrar: de-fatalize an error
- de-fatalize metadata errors
- move type_error_struct! to rustc_typeck
- struct_span_err! -> rustc_errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Make some run-pass or check-pass
* Use `#![allow(incomplete_features)]`
* Update FIXMEs now that some of the issues have been addressed
* Add regression tests
|
|
Merge `TraitItem` & `ImplItem into `AssocItem`
In this PR we:
- Merge `{Trait,Impl}Item{Kind?}` into `AssocItem{Kind?}` as discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65041#issuecomment-538105286.
- This is done by using the cover grammar of both forms.
- In particular, it requires that we syntactically allow (under `#[cfg(FALSE)]`):
- `default`ness on `trait` items,
- `impl` items without a body / definition (`const`, `type`, and `fn`),
- and associated `type`s in `impl`s with bounds, e.g., `type Foo: Ord;`.
- The syntactic restrictions are replaced by semantic ones in `ast_validation`.
- Move syntactic restrictions around C-variadic parameters from the parser into `ast_validation`:
- `fn`s in all contexts now syntactically allow `...`,
- `...` can occur anywhere in the list syntactically (`fn foo(..., x: usize) {}`),
- and `...` can be the sole parameter (`fn foo(...) {}`.
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
r=centril
Revert stabilization of never type
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66757
I decided to keep the separate `never-type-fallback` feature gate, but tried to otherwise revert https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65355. Seemed pretty clean.
( cc @Centril, author of #65355, you may want to check this over briefly )
|
|
This reverts commit 8f6197f39f7d468dfc5b2bd41dae4769992a2f83.
|
|
functions with a `const` modifier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conditional compilation for sanitizers
Configure sanitize option when compiling with a sanitizer to make
it possible to execute different code depending on whether given
sanitizer is enabled or not.
|
|
|
|
Configure sanitize option when compiling with a sanitizer to make
it possible to execute different code depending on whether given
sanitizer is enabled or not.
|
|
Stabilize cfg(doc)
cc #43781.
|
|
|
|
Also remove `never_type` the feature-gate test.
|
|
Correct `const_in_array_repeat_expressions` feature name
Fixes #66433
r? @estebank
|
|
|
|
|
|
rename cfg(rustdoc) into cfg(doc)
Needed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61351
r? @QuietMisdreavus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Stabilize the `re_rebalance_coherence` feature
This PR stabilizes [RFC 2451](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2451-re-rebalancing-coherence.html), re-rebalance coherence.
Changes include removing the attribute from tests which tested both the old and new behavior, moving the feature to `accepted` and removing the old logic.
I'll also open a [PR](https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/reference/pull/703) against the reference, updating it with the content of the RFC.
Closes #63599
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
Remove "here" from "expected one of X here"
|
|
syntax: ABI-oblivious grammar
This PR has the following effects:
1. `extern $lit` is now legal where `$lit:literal` and `$lit` is substituted for a string literal.
2. `extern "abi_that_does_not_exist"` is now *syntactically* legal whereas before, the set of ABI strings was hard-coded into the grammar of the language. With this PR, the set of ABIs are instead validated and translated during lowering. That seems more appropriate.
3. `ast::FloatTy` is now distinct from `rustc_target::abi::FloatTy`. The former is used substantially more and the translation between them is only necessary in a single place.
4. As a result of 2-3, libsyntax no longer depends on librustc_target, which should improve pipe-lining somewhat.
cc @rust-lang/lang -- the points 1-2 slightly change the definition of the language but in a way which seems consistent with our general principles (in particular wrt. the discussions of turning things into semantic errors). I expect this to be uncontroversial but it's worth letting y'all know. :)
r? @varkor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 2d182b82ce5ecfe8090ba3d4e78f1cd72c072ef1.
|
|
This reverts commit c17a1fd7d0ef0f1f546445d0c8bdb11be55e4be7.
|
