| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Remap early bound lifetimes in return-position `impl Trait` in traits too
Fixes part of #103457
r? ``@cjgillot,`` though feel free to reassign, just thought you'd have sufficient context to review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty print lifetimes captured by RPIT
This specifically makes the output in #103409 change from:
```diff
error: `impl` item signature doesn't match `trait` item signature
--> $DIR/signature-mismatch.rs:15:5
|
LL | fn async_fn(&self, buff: &[u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>;
| ----------------------------------------------------------------- expected `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
...
LL | fn async_fn<'a>(&self, buff: &'a [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>> + 'a {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>> + '2`
|
= note: expected `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
- found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
+ found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>> + '2`
= help: the lifetime requirements from the `impl` do not correspond to the requirements in the `trait`
= help: verify the lifetime relationships in the `trait` and `impl` between the `self` argument, the other inputs and its output
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Along with the UI tests in this PR, which I think are all improvements!
r? `@oli-obk` though feel free to re-roll
|
|
Delay ambiguity span bug in normalize query iff not rustdoc
Oli and I decided that the compiler debt of adding another usage of `tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc` is fine, because we don't really want to add more complexity to the normalize query, and moving rustdoc to use fulfill normalization (`fully_normalize`, i.e. not use the normalize query) is unnecessary overhead given that it's skipping binders and stuff.
r? oli-obk
Fixes #102827
Fixes #103181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do anonymous lifetimes remapping correctly for nested rpits
Closes #103141
r? `@cjgillot` `@nikomatsakis`
This fixes a stable to stable regression that in my opinion is `P-critical` so, we probably want to backport it all the way up to stable.
|
|
Require lifetime bounds for opaque types in order to allow hidden types to capture said lifetimes
fixes #96996
cc `@aliemjay`
|
|
|
|
Use the same tense everywhere and prefer display over debug, as these
descriptions are user facing.
|
|
|
|
capture said lifetimes
|
|
Check hidden types in dead code
fixes #99490
r? `@compiler-errors`
best reviewed commit by commit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add test for #102605
Fixes #102605
|
|
Lint against nested opaque types that don't satisfy associated type bounds
See the test failures for examples of places where this lint would fire.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move lint level source explanation to the bottom
So, uhhhhh
r? `@estebank`
## User-facing change
"note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic:
```diff
- = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>
+ = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
```
Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO.
## Developer-facing change
`struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature.
Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)`
After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>`
The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion.
Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere.
## Subtle problem
By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings...
I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate.
## P.S.
I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
|
|
|
|
Serialize return-position `impl Trait` in trait hidden values in foreign libraries
Fixes #101630
|
|
|
|
Neither require nor imply lifetime bounds on opaque type for well formedness
The actual hidden type can live arbitrarily longer than any individual lifetime and arbitrarily shorter than all but one of the lifetimes.
fixes #86218
fixes #84305
This is a **breaking change** but it is a necessary soundness fix
|
|
Note the type when unable to drop values in compile time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compute information about function parameters on THIR
This avoids some manipulation of typeck results while building MIR.
|
|
|
|
Make `compare_predicate_entailment` no longer a query
Make `compare_predicate_entailment` so it's no longer a query (again), and splits out the new logic (that equates the return types to infer RPITITs) into its own query. This means that this new query (now called `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`) is no longer executed for non-RPITIT cases.
This should improve perf (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101224#issuecomment-1241682203), though in practice we see that these some crates remain from the primary regressions list on the original report... They are all <= 0.43% regression and seemingly only on the incr-full scenario for all of them.
I am at a loss for what might be causing this regression other than what I fixed here, since we don't introduce much new non-RPITIT logic except for some `def_kind` query calls in some places, for example, like projection. Maybe that's it?
----
Originally this PR was opened to test enabling `cache_on_disk` (62164aaaa11) but that didn't turn out to be very useful (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101615#issuecomment-1242403205), so that led me to just split the query (and rename the PR).
|
|
|
|
Deny return-position `impl Trait` in traits for object safety
Fixes #101667
|
|
Check that the types in return position `impl Trait` in traits are well-formed
This effectively duplicates `check_associated_type_bounds`, but that shouldn't be for long, since we're going to remove it once we refactor RPITITs into regular associated items.
Fixes #101663
---
We don't check
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar() -> impl ?Sized;
}
```
currently, but that's for a different reason, which is that we don't currently check that a trait function's return type is sized (i.e. `fn bar() -> [u8]` also works in a trait).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
