| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
The relevant filtering should have been performed by borrowck.
|
|
Recurse into nested impl-trait when computing variance.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105251
|
|
When *any* of the suggested impls is an exact match, *only* show the
exact matches. This is particularly relevant for integer types.
fix fmt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ignore bivariant parameters in test_type_match.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103491 made opaque types bivariant with respect of some of their lifetime parameters. Because of this bivariance, some lifetime variables were not unified to anything during borrowck, and were considered as unequal by borrowck type test.
This PR makes type test ignore the bivariant parameters in test_type_match.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104815
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
After removing `GenFuture`, I special-cased async generators to pretty-print as `impl Future<Output = X>` mainly to avoid too much diagnostics changes originally.
This now reverses that change so that async fn/blocks are pretty-printed as `[$movability `async` $something@$source-position]` in various diagnostics, and updates the tests that this touches.
|
|
|
|
Allow opaque types in trait impl headers and rely on coherence to reject unsound cases
r? ````@lcnr````
fixes #99840
|
|
Check generics parity before collecting return-position `impl Trait`s in trait
The only thing is that this duplicates the error message for number of generics mismatch, but we already deduplicate that error message in Cargo. I could add a flag to delay the error if the reviewer cares.
Fixes #104281
Also drive-by adds a few comments to the `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys` method, and removes an unused argument from `compare_number_of_generics`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move tests
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
unsound cases
|
|
Support using `Self` or projections inside an RPIT/async fn
I reuse the same idea as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103449 to use variances to encode whether a lifetime parameter is captured by impl-trait.
The current implementation of async and RPIT replace all lifetimes from the parent generics by `'static`. This PR changes the scheme
```rust
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
fn foo<'b, T>() -> impl Into<Self> + 'b { ... }
}
opaque Foo::<'_a>::foo::<'_b, T>::opaque<'b>: Into<Foo<'_a>> + 'b;
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
// OLD
fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'static>::foo::<'static, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
^^^^^^^ the `Self` becomes `Foo<'static>`
// NEW
fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'a>::foo::<'b, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
^^ the `Self` stays `Foo<'a>`
}
```
There is the same issue with projections. In the example, substitute `Self` by `<T as Trait<'b>>::Assoc` in the sugared version, and `Foo<'_a>` by `<T as Trait<'_b>>::Assoc` in the desugared one.
This allows to support `Self` in impl-trait, since we do not replace lifetimes by `'static` any more. The same trick allows to use projections like `T::Assoc` where `Self` is allowed. The feature is gated behind a `impl_trait_projections` feature gate.
The implementation relies on 2 tweaking rules for opaques in 2 places:
- we only relate substs that correspond to captured lifetimes during TypeRelation;
- we only list captured lifetimes in choice region computation.
For simplicity, I encoded the "capturedness" of lifetimes as a variance, `Bivariant` vs `Invariant` for unused vs captured lifetimes. The `variances_of` query used to ICE for opaques.
Impl-trait that do not reference `Self` or projections will have their variances as:
- `o` (invariant) for each parent type or const;
- `*` (bivariant) for each parent lifetime --> will not participate in borrowck;
- `o` (invariant) for each own lifetime.
Impl-trait that does reference `Self` and/or projections will have some parent lifetimes marked as `o` (as the example above), and participate in type relation and borrowck. In the example above, `variances_of(opaque) = ['_a: o, '_b: *, T: o, 'b: o]`.
r? types
cc `@compiler-errors` , as you asked about the issue with `Self` and projections.
|
|
|
|
r=fee1-dead
Improve spans for RPITIT object-safety errors
No reason why we can't point at the `impl Trait` that causes the object-safety violation.
Also [drive-by: Add is_async fn to hir::IsAsync](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104593/commits/c4165f3a965e258531928180195637455299c6f3), which touches clippy too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduce closure signature from a type alias `impl Trait`'s supertraits
r? `@oli-obk`
Basically pass the TAIT's bounds through the same method that we're using to deduce a signature from infer var closure bounds.
Does this need a new FCP? I see it as a logical extension of #101834, but happy to rfcbot a new one if it does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102049 (Add the `#[derive_const]` attribute)
- #103970 (Unhide unknown spans)
- #104206 (Remove `save_and_restore_in_snapshot_flag`, use `ObligationCtxt` more)
- #104214 (Emit error in `collecting_trait_impl_trait_tys` on mismatched signatures)
- #104267 (rustdoc: use checkbox instead of switch for settings toggles)
- #104302 (Update cargo)
- #104303 (UI tests can be assigned to T-compiler)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, a `delay_span_bug` was isssued, failing normalization. This
create a `TyKind::Error` in the signature, which caused
`compare_predicate_entailment` to swallow its signature mismatch error,
causing ICEs because no error was emitted.
|
|
Properly remap and check for substs compatibility in `confirm_impl_trait_in_trait_candidate`
Fixes #103824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow `impl Fn() -> impl Trait` in return position
_This was originally proposed as part of #93082 which was [closed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93082#issuecomment-1027225715) due to allowing `impl Fn() -> impl Trait` in argument position._
This allows writing the following function signatures:
```rust
fn f0() -> impl Fn() -> impl Trait;
fn f3() -> &'static dyn Fn() -> impl Trait;
```
These signatures were already allowed for common traits and associated types, there is no reason why `Fn*` traits should be special in this regard.
`impl Trait` in both `f0` and `f3` means "new existential type", just like with `-> impl Iterator<Item = impl Trait>` and such.
Arrow in `impl Fn() ->` is right-associative and binds from right to left, it's tested by [this test](https://github.com/WaffleLapkin/rust/blob/a819fecb8dea438fc70488ddec30a61e52942672/src/test/ui/impl-trait/impl_fn_associativity.rs).
There even is a test that `f0` compiles:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/2f004d2d401682e553af3984ebd9a3976885e752/src/test/ui/impl-trait/nested_impl_trait.rs#L25-L28
But it was changed in [PR 48084 (lines)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48084/files#diff-ccecca938872d65ffe8cd1c3ef1956e309fac83bcda547d8b16b89257e53a437R37) to test the opposite, probably unintentionally given [PR 48084 (lines)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48084/files#diff-5a02f1ed43debed1fd24f7aad72490064f795b9420f15d847bac822aa4621a1cR476-R477).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
----
This limitation is especially annoying with async code, since it forces one to write this:
```rust
trait AsyncFn3<A, B, C>: Fn(A, B, C) -> <Self as AsyncFn3<A, B, C>>::Future {
type Future: Future<Output = Self::Out>;
type Out;
}
impl<A, B, C, Fut, F> AsyncFn3<A, B, C> for F
where
F: Fn(A, B, C) -> Fut,
Fut: Future,
{
type Future = Fut;
type Out = Fut::Output;
}
fn async_closure() -> impl AsyncFn3<i32, i32, i32, Out = u32> {
|a, b, c| async move { (a + b + c) as u32 }
}
```
Instead of:
```rust
fn async_closure() -> impl Fn(i32, i32, i32) -> impl Future<Output = u32> {
|a, b, c| async move { (a + b + c) as u32 }
}
```
|
|
Remap early bound lifetimes in return-position `impl Trait` in traits too
Fixes part of #103457
r? ``@cjgillot,`` though feel free to reassign, just thought you'd have sufficient context to review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This allows writing the following function signatures:
```rust
fn f0() -> impl Fn() -> impl Trait;
fn f3() -> &'static dyn Fn() -> impl Trait;
```
These signatures were already allowed for common traits and associated
types, there is no reason why `Fn*` traits should be special in this
regard.
|
|
|
|
Pretty print lifetimes captured by RPIT
This specifically makes the output in #103409 change from:
```diff
error: `impl` item signature doesn't match `trait` item signature
--> $DIR/signature-mismatch.rs:15:5
|
LL | fn async_fn(&self, buff: &[u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>;
| ----------------------------------------------------------------- expected `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
...
LL | fn async_fn<'a>(&self, buff: &'a [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>> + 'a {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>> + '2`
|
= note: expected `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
- found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>>`
+ found `fn(&'1 Struct, &'2 [u8]) -> impl Future<Output = Vec<u8>> + '2`
= help: the lifetime requirements from the `impl` do not correspond to the requirements in the `trait`
= help: verify the lifetime relationships in the `trait` and `impl` between the `self` argument, the other inputs and its output
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Along with the UI tests in this PR, which I think are all improvements!
r? `@oli-obk` though feel free to re-roll
|
|
Delay ambiguity span bug in normalize query iff not rustdoc
Oli and I decided that the compiler debt of adding another usage of `tcx.sess.opts.actually_rustdoc` is fine, because we don't really want to add more complexity to the normalize query, and moving rustdoc to use fulfill normalization (`fully_normalize`, i.e. not use the normalize query) is unnecessary overhead given that it's skipping binders and stuff.
r? oli-obk
Fixes #102827
Fixes #103181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do anonymous lifetimes remapping correctly for nested rpits
Closes #103141
r? `@cjgillot` `@nikomatsakis`
This fixes a stable to stable regression that in my opinion is `P-critical` so, we probably want to backport it all the way up to stable.
|
