summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/ui/issues/issue-72002.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2020-05-11Ignore arguments when looking for `IndexMut` for subsequent `mut` obligationEsteban Küber-0/+29
Given code like `v[&field].boo();` where `field: String` and `.boo(&mut self)`, typeck will have decided that `v` is accessed using `Index`, but when `boo` adds a new `mut` obligation, `convert_place_op_to_mutable` is called. When this happens, for *some reason* the arguments' dereference adjustments are completely ignored causing an error saying that `IndexMut` is not satisfied: ``` error[E0596]: cannot borrow data in an index of `Indexable` as mutable --> src/main.rs:30:5 | 30 | v[&field].boo(); | ^^^^^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable | = help: trait `IndexMut` is required to modify indexed content, but it is not implemented for `Indexable` ``` This is not true, but by changing `try_overloaded_place_op` to retry when given `Needs::MutPlace` without passing the argument types, the example successfully compiles. I believe there might be more appropriate ways to deal with this.