| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
One surprise: old-lub-glb-object.rs, may indicate a bug
|
|
In our type inference system, when we "generalize" a type T to become
a suitable value for a type variable V, we sometimes wind up creating
new inference variables. So, for example, if we are making V be some
subtype of `&'X u32`, then we might instantiate V with `&'Y u32`.
This generalized type is then related `&'Y u32 <: &'X u32`, resulting
in a region constriant `'Y: 'X`. Previously, however, we were making
these fresh variables like `'Y` in the "current universe", but they
should be created in the universe of V. Moreover, we sometimes cheat
in an invariant context and avoid creating fresh variables if we know
the result must be equal -- we can only do that when the universes
work out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recover from item trailing semicolon
CC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2479
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
clarify resolve typo suggestion
Include the kind of the binding that we're suggesting, and use a
structured suggestion.
Fixes #53445.
|
|
Use structured suggestions for nonstandard style lints
This PR modifies the lints in the nonstandard_style group to use structured suggestions. Note that there's a bit of tricky span calculation going on for the `crate_name` attribute. It also simplifies the code a bit: I don't think the "fallback" suggestions for these lints can actually be triggered.
Fixes #48103.
Fixes #52414.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #56874 (Simplify foreign type rendering.)
- #57113 (Move diagnostics out from QueryJob and optimize for the case with no diagnostics)
- #57366 (Point at match discriminant on type error in match arm pattern)
- #57538 (librustc_mir: Fix ICE with slice patterns)
Failed merges:
- #57381 (Tweak output of type mismatch between "then" and `else` `if` arms)
r? @ghost
|
|
librustc_mir: Fix ICE with slice patterns
If a match arm does not include all fields in a structure and a later
pattern includes a field that is an array, we will attempt to use the
array type from the prior arm. When calculating the field type, treat
a array of an unknown size as a `TyErr`.
Fixes: #57472
|
|
Point at match discriminant on type error in match arm pattern
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:5:9
|
4 | let temp: usize = match a + b {
| ----- this expression has type `usize`
5 | Ok(num) => num,
| ^^^^^^^ expected usize, found enum `std::result::Result`
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found type `std::result::Result<_, _>`
```
Fix #57279.
|
|
Make more passes incremental
r? @michaelwoerister
|
|
NLL: Add union justifications to conflicting borrows.
Fixes #57100.
This PR adds justifications to error messages for conflicting borrows of union fields.
Where previously an error message would say ``cannot borrow `u.b` as mutable..``, it now says ``cannot borrow `u` (via `u.b`) as mutable..``.
r? @pnkfelix
|
|
If a match arm does not include all fields in a structure and a later
pattern includes a field that is an array, we will attempt to use the
array type from the prior arm. When calculating the field type, treat
a array of an unknown size as a TyErr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilise irrefutable if-let and while-let patterns
This stabilises RFC 2086 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44495).
This replaces https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/55639, as we want to stabilise this in time for the beta cut-off.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/55639.
r? @Centril
|
|
Stabilize `let` bindings and destructuring in constants and const fn
r? @Centril
This PR stabilizes the following features in constants and `const` functions:
* irrefutable destructuring patterns (e.g. `const fn foo((x, y): (u8, u8)) { ... }`)
* `let` bindings (e.g. `let x = 1;`)
* mutable `let` bindings (e.g. `let mut x = 1;`)
* assignment (e.g. `x = y`) and assignment operator (e.g. `x += y`) expressions, even where the assignment target is a projection (e.g. a struct field or index operation like `x[3] = 42`)
* expression statements (e.g. `3;`)
This PR does explicitly *not* stabilize:
* mutable references (i.e. `&mut T`)
* dereferencing mutable references
* refutable patterns (e.g. `Some(x)`)
* operations on `UnsafeCell` types (as that would need raw pointers and mutable references and such, not because it is explicitly forbidden. We can't explicitly forbid it as such values are OK as long as they aren't mutated.)
* We are not stabilizing `let` bindings in constants that use `&&` and `||` short circuiting operations. These are treated as `&` and `|` inside `const` and `static` items right now. If we stopped treating them as `&` and `|` after stabilizing `let` bindings, we'd break code like `let mut x = false; false && { x = true; false };`. So to use `let` bindings in constants you need to change `&&` and `||` to `&` and `|` respectively.
|
|
|
|
This stabilises RFC 2086 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44495).
Co-Authored-By: Sebastian Malton <sebastian@malton.name>
|
|
use the correct supertrait substitution in `object_ty_for_trait`
beta-nominating because regression.
Fixes #57156.
|
|
|
|
Include the kind of the binding that we're suggesting, and use a
structured suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use a structured suggestion and tighten the span to just the identifier.
|
|
Make sure feature gate errors are recoverable (take 2)
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56999/commits/15cefe4b2a65bb2a4febcd353cb37b90dfafa4f1.
Turns out I missed the most important part - the main feature gate checking pass.
|
|
|
|
use structured suggestion for method calls
Furthermore, don't suggest calling the method if it is part of a place
expression, as this is invalid syntax.
I'm thinking it might be worth putting a label on the method assignment span like "this is a method" and removing the span from the "methods are immutable" text so it isn't reported twice.
The suggestions in `src/test/ui/did_you_mean/issue-40396.stderr` are suboptimal. I could check if the containing expression is `BinOp`, but I'm not sure if that's general enough. Any ideas?
r? @estebank
|
|
Modify mismatched type error for functions with no return
Fix #50009.
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/coercion-missing-tail-expected-type.rs:3:24
|
LL | fn plus_one(x: i32) -> i32 { //~ ERROR mismatched types
| -------- ^^^ expected i32, found ()
| |
| this function's body doesn't return
LL | x + 1;
| - help: consider removing this semicolon
|
= note: expected type `i32`
found type `()`
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/coercion-missing-tail-expected-type.rs:3:28
|
LL | fn plus_one(x: i32) -> i32 { //~ ERROR mismatched types
| ____________________________^
LL | | x + 1;
| | - help: consider removing this semicolon
LL | | }
| |_^ expected i32, found ()
|
= note: expected type `i32`
found type `()`
```
|
|
Fixes #57156.
|
|
Fix broken links to second edition TRPL.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57104.
Remove `second-edition/` from TRPL hyperlinks.
|
|
Fix #56806 by using `delay_span_bug` in object safety layout sanity checks
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait method that with an invalid receiver type. This caused an ICE in #56806, because `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` for `self: Box<dyn Trait>`, which causes one of the layout sanity checks in object_safety.rs to fail. Replacing `bug!` with `delay_span_bug` solves this.
The fact that `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` here could be considered a bug. It passes the check that the method implements, though: `Box<dyn Trait>` implements `DispatchFromDyn<Box<dyn Trait>>` because `dyn Trait` implements `Unsize<dyn Trait>`. It would be good to hear what @eddyb and @nikomatsakis think.
Note that I only added a test for the case encountered in #56806. I could not come up with a case that triggered an ICE from the other check, `bug!("receiver when Self = dyn Trait should be ScalarPair, found Scalar")`. There is no way, to my knowledge, that you can make `receiver_is_dispatchable` return true but still have a `Scalar` ABI when `Self = dyn Trait`.
One other case I encountered while debugging #56806 was that if you have a type parameter `T` that implements `Deref<Target=Self>` and `DispatchFromDyn<T>`, and use it as a method receiver, it will cause an ICE during `is_object_safe` because `T` has no layout ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=d9b7497b3be0ca8382fa7d9497263214)):
```rust
trait Trait<T: Deref<Target=Self> + DispatchFromDyn<T>> {
fn foo(self: T) -> dyn Trait<T>;
}
```
I don't intend to remove the ICE there because it is a pathological case, especially since there is no way to implement `DispatchFromDyn<T>` for `T` — the checks in typeck/coherence/builtin.rs do not allow that.
fixes #56806
r? @varkor
|
|
Add support for trait-objects without a principal
The hard-error version of #56481 - should be merged after we do something about the `traitobject` crate.
Fixes #33140.
Fixes #57057.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait that is ill-formed, and we shouldn't ICE unless there are no errors being raised. Using `delay_span_bug` solves this.
fixes #56806
|
|
This commit improves diagnostic labels to mention which field a borrow
overlaps with and adds a note explaining that the fields overlap.
|
|
Fixes #57162.
|
|
make `panictry!` private to libsyntax
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
|
|
This makes sure they are printed in a compiler-version-independent
order, avoiding ui test instability.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, don't suggest calling the method if it is part of a place
expression, as this is invalid syntax.
|
|
Still not great, but good enough to land this PR.
|
|
In particular, when we want to indicate that there is a connection
between the self type and the other types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
|
|
Improve type mismatch error messages
Closes #56115.
Replace "integral variable" with "integer" and replace "floating-point variable" with "floating-point number" to make the message less confusing.
TODO the book and clippy needs to be changed accordingly later.
r? @varkor
|
|
Suggest using raw identifiers in 2018 edition when using keywords
|
