| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Suggest the right help message for as_ref
Fixes #100605
|
|
suggest `once_cell::Lazy` for non-const statics
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100410
Some questions:
- removing the `if` seems to include too many cases (e.g. calls to non-const functions inside a `const fn`), but this code excludes the following case:
```rust
const FOO: Foo = non_const_fn();
```
Should we suggest `once_cell` in this case as well?
- The original issue mentions suggesting `AtomicI32` instead of `Mutex<i32>`, should this PR address that as well?
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99576 (Do not allow `Drop` impl on foreign fundamental types)
- #100081 (never consider unsafe blocks unused if they would be required with deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn))
- #100208 (make NOP dyn casts not require anything about the vtable)
- #100494 (Cleanup rustdoc themes)
- #100522 (Only check the `DefId` for the recursion check in MIR inliner.)
- #100592 (Manually implement Debug for ImportKind.)
- #100598 (Don't fix builtin index when Where clause is found)
- #100721 (Add diagnostics lints to `rustc_type_ir` module)
- #100731 (rustdoc: count deref and non-deref as same set of used methods)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Lazily decode SourceFile from metadata
Currently, source files from foreign crates are decoded up-front from metadata.
Spans from those crates were matched with the corresponding source using binary search among those files.
This PR changes the strategy by matching spans to files during encoding. This allows to decode source files on-demand, instead of up-front. The on-disk format for spans becomes: `<tag> <position from start of file> <length> <file index> <crate (if foreign file)>`.
|
|
|
|
r=TaKO8Ki
Do not allow `Drop` impl on foreign fundamental types
`Drop` should not be implemented on `Pin<T>` even if `T` is local.
This does not trigger regular orphan rules is because `Pin` is `#[fundamental]`... but we don't allow specialized `Drop` impls anyways, so these rules are not sufficient to prevent this impl on stable. Let's just choose even stricter rules, since we shouldn't be implementing `Drop` on a foreign ADT ever.
Fixes #99575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=lcnr
Argument type error improvements
Motivated by this interesting code snippet:
```rust
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
struct Wrapper<T>(T);
fn foo(_: fn(i32), _: Wrapper<i32>) {}
fn f(_: u32) {}
fn main() {
let w = Wrapper::<isize>(1isize);
foo(f, w);
}
```
Which currently errors like:
```
error[E0308]: arguments to this function are incorrect
--> src/main.rs:10:5
|
10 | foo(f, w);
| ^^^ - - expected `i32`, found `isize`
| |
| expected `i32`, found `u32`
|
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(i32)`
found fn item `fn(u32) {f}`
= note: expected struct `Wrapper<i32>`
found struct `Wrapper<isize>`
note: function defined here
--> src/main.rs:4:4
|
4 | fn foo(_: fn(i32), _: Wrapper<i32>) {}
| ^^^ ---------- ---------------
```
Specifically, that double `expected .. found ..` which is very difficult to correlate to the types in the arguments. Also, the fact that "expected `i32`, found `isize`" and the other argument mismatch label don't even really explain what's going on here.
After this PR:
```
error[E0308]: arguments to this function are incorrect
--> $DIR/two-mismatch-notes.rs:10:5
|
LL | foo(f, w);
| ^^^
|
note: expected fn pointer, found fn item
--> $DIR/two-mismatch-notes.rs:10:9
|
LL | foo(f, w);
| ^
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(i32)`
found fn item `fn(u32) {f}`
note: expected struct `Wrapper`, found a different struct `Wrapper`
--> $DIR/two-mismatch-notes.rs:10:12
|
LL | foo(f, w);
| ^
= note: expected struct `Wrapper<i32>`
found struct `Wrapper<isize>`
note: function defined here
--> $DIR/two-mismatch-notes.rs:4:4
|
LL | fn foo(_: fn(i32), _: Wrapper<i32>) {}
| ^^^ ---------- ---------------
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
```
Yeah, it's a bit verbose, but much clearer IMO.
---
Open to discussions about how this could be further improved. Motivated by `@jyn514's` [tweet](https://mobile.twitter.com/joshuayn514/status/1558042020601634816) here.
|
|
r=estebank
Only point out a single function parameter if we have a single arg incompatibility
Fixes #99635
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generalize trait object generic param check to aliases.
The current algorithm only checks that `Self` does not appear in defaults for traits. This is not sufficient for trait aliases.
This PR moves the check to trait object elaboration, which sees through trait aliases.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82927.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84789.
|
|
|
|
Some "this expression has a field"-related fixes
Each commit does something different and is worth reviewing, but the final diff from `master..HEAD` contains the sum of the changes to the UI tests, since some commits added UI tests "regressions" which were later removed in other commits.
The only change I could see adding on top of this is suppressing `Clone::clone` from the "this expression has a field that has this method" suggestion, since it's so commonly implemented by types that it's not worthwhile suggesting in general.
|
|
Further improve error message for E0081
Closes #97533
|
|
Implement special-cased projection error message for some common traits
Not sure what the best phrasing is, but I feel like these are more clear than the plain `<Type as Iterator>::Output == Type` messages.
If this is actually a good idea, are there any other traits this could benefit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple duplicate assignments of the same discriminant are now reported
in the samme error. We now point out the incrementation start point for
discriminants that are not explicitly assigned that are also duplicates.
Removed old test related to E0081 that is now covered by error-codes/E0081.rs.
Also refactored parts of the `check_enum` function.
|
|
Prior work, notably 6550021124451628b1efc60c59284465b109e3aa from #88316
has removed box syntax from most of the testsuite. However,
some tests were left out.
This commit removes box_syntax uses from more locations in src/test.
Some tests that are very box syntax specific are not being migrated.
|
|
|
|
WaffleLapkin:improve_diagnostics_for_missing_type_in_a_const_item, r=compiler-errors
Improve diagnostics for `const a: = expr;`
Adds a suggestion to write a type when there is a colon, but the type is not present.
I've also shrunk spans a little, so the suggestions are a little nicer.
Resolves #100146
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
Warn about dead tuple struct fields
Continuation of #92972. Fixes #92790.
The language team has already commented on this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92972#issuecomment-1021511970; I have incorporated their requests here. Specifically, there is now a new allow-by-default `unused_tuple_struct_fields` lint (name bikesheddable), and fields of unit type are ignored (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92972#issuecomment-1021815408), so error messages look like this:
```
error: field is never read: `1`
--> $DIR/tuple-struct-field.rs:6:21
|
LL | struct Wrapper(i32, [u8; LEN], String);
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
help: change the field to unit type to suppress this warning while preserving the field numbering
|
LL | struct Wrapper(i32, (), String);
| ~~
```
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
fix is_disaligned logic for nested packed structs
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83605 broke the `is_disaligned` logic by bailing out of the loop in `is_within_packed` early. This PR fixes that problem and adds suitable tests.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove useless `#[allow]` in a test
The mentioned issue, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54586 was fixed 4 years ago :)
|
|
|
|
Resolve function lifetime elision on the AST
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97720~
Lifetime elision for functions is purely syntactic in nature, so can be resolved on the AST.
This PR replicates the elision logic and diagnostics on the AST, and replaces HIR-based resolution by a `delay_span_bug`.
This refactor allows for more consistent diagnostics, which don't have to guess the original code from HIR.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
|
|
Do not resolve associated const when there is no provided value
Fixes #98629, since now we just delay a bug when we're not able to evaluate a const item due to the value not actually being provided by anything. This means compilation proceeds forward to where the "missing item in impl" error is emitted.
----
The root issue here is that when we're looking for the defining `LeafDef` in `resolve_associated_item`, we end up getting the trait's AssocItem instead of the impl's AssocItem (which does not exist). This resolution "succeeds" even if the trait's item has no default value, and then since this item has no value to evaluate, it turns into a const eval error.
This root issue becomes problematic (as in #98629) when this const eval error happens in wfcheck (for example, due to normalizing the param-env of something that references this const). Since this happens sooner than the check that an impl actually provides all of the items that a trait requires (which happens during later typecheck), we end up aborting compilation early with only this un-informative message.
I'm not exactly sure _why_ this bug arises due to #96591 -- perhaps valtrees are evaluated more eagerly than in the old system?
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@lcnr`` since y'all are familiar with const eval and reviewed #96591, though feel free to reassign.
This is a regression from stable to beta, so I would be open to considering this for beta backport. It seems correct to me, especially given the improvements in the other UI tests this PR touches, but may have some side-effects that I'm unaware of...?
|
|
Don't suggest unnameable generic arguments
Fixes #99565.
`@rustbot` label T-compiler A-diagnostics
r? `@rust-lang/wg-diagnostics`
|
|
|
|
r=fee1-dead
Improve suggestions for returning binding
Fixes #99525
Also reworks the cause codes for match and if a bit, I think cleaning them up in a positive way.
We no longer need to call `could_remove_semicolon` in successful code, which might save a few cycles?
|
|
|
|
Add `PhantomData` marker for dropck to `BTreeMap`
closes #99408
|
|
|
|
r=petrochenkov,GuillaumeGomez
Improve the function pointer docs
This is #97842 but for function pointers instead of tuples. The concept is basically the same.
* Reduce duplicate impls; show `fn (T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ)` and include a sentence saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.
https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-test/std/primitive.fn.html
|
|
* Reduce duplicate impls; show only the `fn (T)` and include a sentence
saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.
|
|
Add E0790 as more specific variant of E0283
Fixes #81701
I think this should be good to go, there are only two things where I am somewhat unsure:
- Is there a better way to get the fully-qualified path for the suggestion? I tried `self.tcx.def_path_str`, but that didn't seem to always give a correct path for the context.
- Should all this be extracted into it's own method or is it fine where it is?
r? `@estebank`
|
