summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/ui/lifetimes
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2020-05-30Tweak type parameter errors to reduce verbosityEsteban Küber-39/+7
2020-05-27review comments: change wording and visual outputEsteban Küber-1/+1
2020-05-27Modify wordingEsteban Küber-2/+2
2020-05-27review commentsEsteban Küber-1/+1
2020-05-27Tweak output for mismatched impl itemEsteban Küber-2/+2
Detect type parameter that might require lifetime constraint. Do not name `ReVar`s in expected/found output. Reword text suggesting to check the lifetimes.
2020-05-27Name `RegionKind::ReVar` lifetimes in diagnosticsEsteban Küber-1/+3
2020-05-07Add test for #34979Yuki Okushi-0/+23
2020-04-22Tweak wordingEsteban Küber-4/+4
2020-04-22Tweak `'static` suggestion codeEsteban Küber-4/+20
Fix #71196.
2020-04-16outlives: ignore lifetimes shallowly found in `ty::FnDef`s.Eduard-Mihai Burtescu-0/+13
2020-03-12update testsMark Mansi-5/+5
2020-02-22update some testsMark Mansi-5/+5
2020-02-19Tweak binding lifetime suggestion textEsteban Küber-5/+5
We already have a structured suggestion, but the wording made it seem like that wasn't the case. Fix #65286. r? @varkor
2020-02-06rustc_macros: don't limit the -Zmacro-backtrace suggestion to extern macros.Eduard-Mihai Burtescu-1/+1
2020-02-06rustc: rename -Zexternal-macro-backtrace to -Zmacro-backtrace.Eduard-Mihai Burtescu-1/+1
2020-02-05Account for `fn()` types in lifetime suggestionsEsteban Küber-18/+6
2020-02-05review commentsEsteban Küber-3/+3
2020-02-05Suggest `'r` instead of `'lifetime`Esteban Küber-6/+6
2020-02-05When suggesting lifetimes, propose adding the new lifetime to all argumentsEsteban Küber-6/+6
2020-02-05Use spans for input borrowed types unrelated to return typeEsteban Küber-3/+15
2020-02-02Use more accurate failed predicate spansEsteban Küber-20/+22
2020-02-02Point at arguments or output when fn obligations come from them, or ident ↵Esteban Küber-46/+28
when they don't
2020-01-19review commentsEsteban Küber-3/+3
2020-01-19When encountering an expected named lifetime and none are present, suggest ↵Esteban Küber-3/+15
adding one
2020-01-16review commentsEsteban Küber-1/+1
2020-01-16When trait bounds are missing for return values, point at themEsteban Küber-0/+3
2019-12-28Do not ICE on lifetime error involving closuresEsteban Küber-0/+18
2019-11-21Auto merge of #66389 - estebank:type-err-labels, r=petrochenkovbors-4/+4
Specific labels when referring to "expected" and "found" types
2019-11-18Auto merge of #58281 - mark-i-m:synthesis, r=estebankbors-0/+16
Add outlives suggestions for some lifetime errors This PR implements suggestion diagnostics for some lifetime mismatch errors. When the borrow checker finds that some lifetime 'a doesn't outlive some other lifetime 'b that it should outlive, then in addition to the current lifetime error, we also emit a suggestion for how to fix the problem by adding a bound: - If a and b are normal named regions, suggest to add the bound `'a: 'b` - If b is static, suggest to replace a with static - If b also needs to outlive a, they must be the same, so suggest unifying them We start with a simpler implementation that avoids diagnostic regression or implementation complexity: - We only makes suggestions for lifetimes the user can already name (eg not closure regions or elided regions) - For now, we only emit a help note, not an actually suggestion because it is significantly easier. Finally, there is one hack: it seems that implicit regions in async fn are given the name '_ incorrectly. To avoid suggesting '_: 'x, we simply filter out such lifetimes by name. For more info, see this internals thread: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/mechanical-suggestions-for-some-borrow-checker-errors/9049/3 TL;DR Make suggestions to add a `where 'a: 'b` constraint for some lifetime errors. Details are in the paper linked from the internals thread above. r? @estebank TODO - [x] Clean up code - [x] Only make idiomatic suggestions - [x] don't suggest naming `&'a self` - [x] rather than `'a: 'static`, suggest replacing `'a` with `'static` - [x] rather than `'a: 'b, 'b: 'a`, suggest replacing `'a` with `'b` or vice versa - [x] Performance (maybe need a perf run when this is closer to the finish line?) - perf run was clean... - EDIT: perf run seems to only check non-error performance... How do we check that error performance didn't regress? - [x] Needs ui tests - [x] Integrate the `help` message into the main lifetime `error`
2019-11-18Specific labels when referring to "expected" and "found" typesEsteban Küber-4/+4
2019-11-07Update ui testsGuillaume Gomez-0/+25
2019-10-29Point at the trait item and tweak wordingEsteban Küber-2/+5
2019-10-29review commentsEsteban Küber-2/+2
2019-10-29Custom lifetime error for `impl` item doesn't conform to `trait`Esteban Küber-0/+23
2019-10-27update testsMark Mansi-0/+16
2019-10-11Print lifetimes with backticksYuki Okushi-2/+2
2019-09-12update testsMark Mansi-3/+3
2019-08-19distinguish object-lifetime-default elision from other elisionNiko Matsakis-6/+6
Object-lifetime-default elision is distinct from other forms of elision; it always refers to some enclosing lifetime *present in the surrounding type* (e.g., `&dyn Bar` expands to `&'a (dyn Bar + 'a)`. If there is no enclosing lifetime, then it expands to `'static`. Therefore, in an `impl Trait<Item = dyn Bar>` setting, we don't expand to create a lifetime parameter for the `dyn Bar + 'X` bound. It will just be resolved to `'static`. Annoyingly, the responsibility for this resolution is spread across multiple bits of code right now (`middle::resolve_lifetimes`, `lowering`). The lowering code knows that the default is for an object lifetime, but it doesn't know what the correct result would be. Probably this should be fixed, but what we do now is a surgical fix: we have it generate a different result for elided lifetimes in a object context, and then we can ignore those results when figuring out the lifetimes that are captured in the opaque type.
2019-06-13Create fewer basic blocks in match MIR loweringMatthew Jasper-3/+3
2019-05-29Update ui test suite to use dynmemoryruins-24/+24
2019-05-12Change compare mode to use -Zborrowck=mirMatthew Jasper-0/+399
2019-05-03Update testsChristopher Vittal-52/+14
2019-04-25Rollup merge of #60160 - xldenis:fix-overlapping-zero-width-annotation, ↵Mazdak Farrokhzad-3/+1
r=estebank Fix #58270, fix off-by-one error in error diagnostics. This fixes #58270 by checking if two diagnostics overlap completely when we're calculating the line offset for each message.
2019-04-22Fix #58270, fix off-by-one error in error diagnostics.Xavier Denis-3/+1
2019-04-22Remove double trailing newlinesvarkor-3/+0
2019-04-22update tests for migrate mode by defaultMatthew Jasper-26/+9
2019-04-18hide `--explain` hint if error has no extended infoAndy Russell-26/+1
2019-03-11Update NLL testsVadim Petrochenkov-1/+1
2019-03-11Update testsVadim Petrochenkov-64/+64
2018-12-25Remove licensesMark Rousskov-496/+75