| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
(cherry picked from commit 8ce761d75ed5132c90bfe28e983d83007b8ce7c3)
|
|
position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When there are multiple macros in use, it can be difficult to tell
which one was responsible for producing an error.
|
|
Parse unsupported "default field const values":
```rust
struct S {
field: Type = const_val,
}
```
Recover from small `:` typo and provide suggestion:
```rust
struct S {
field; Type,
field2= Type,
}
```
|
|
|
|
Handle incorrect placement of parentheses in trait bounds more gracefully
Fix #84772.
CC ``````@jonhoo``````
|
|
|
|
Update BARE_TRAIT_OBJECT and ELLIPSIS_INCLUSIVE_RANGE_PATTERNS to errors in Rust 2021
This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81244 by updating two lints to errors in the Rust 2021 edition.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
Fix #84772.
|
|
|
|
Stablize `non-ascii-idents`
This is the stablization PR for RFC 2457. Currently this is waiting on fcp in [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55467).
r? `@Manishearth`
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 6
cc #73494
r? `@petrochenkov`
git mv bad/bad-const-type.* static/
git mv bad/bad-crate-name.* extern
git mv bad/bad-env-capture* fn/
git mv bad/bad-expr-lhs.* expr/
git mv bad/bad-expr-path* expr/
git mv bad/bad-extern-link-attrs.* extern/
git mv bad/bad-intrinsic-monomorphization.* intrinsics/
git mv bad/bad-lint-cap* lint/
git mv bad/bad-main.* fn
git mv bad/bad-method-typaram-kind.* type/
git mv bad/bad-mid-path-type-params.* fn
git mv bad/bad-module.* modules/
git mv bad/bad-sized.* type/
git mv bad/bad-type-env-capture.* fn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't call bump in check_mistyped_turbofish_with_multiple_type_params
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84117
|
|
|
|
warn-by-default on 2015
|
|
Avoid `;` -> `,` recovery and unclosed `}` recovery from being too verbose
Those two recovery attempts have a very bad interaction that causes too
unnecessary output. Add a simple gate to avoid interpreting a `;` as a
`,` when there are unclosed braces.
Fix #83498.
|
|
Those two recovery attempts have a very bad interaction that causes too
unnecessary output. Add a simple gate to avoid interpreting a `;` as a
`,` when there are unclosed braces.
|
|
|
|
This commit implements the idea of a new ABI for the WebAssembly target,
one called `"wasm"`. This ABI is entirely of my own invention
and has no current precedent, but I think that the addition of this ABI
might help solve a number of issues with the WebAssembly targets.
When `wasm32-unknown-unknown` was first added to Rust I naively
"implemented an abi" for the target. I then went to write `wasm-bindgen`
which accidentally relied on details of this ABI. Turns out the ABI
definition didn't match C, which is causing issues for C/Rust interop.
Currently the compiler has a "wasm32 bindgen compat" ABI which is the
original implementation I added, and it's purely there for, well,
`wasm-bindgen`.
Another issue with the WebAssembly target is that it's not clear to me
when and if the default C ABI will change to account for WebAssembly's
multi-value feature (a feature that allows functions to return multiple
values). Even if this does happen, though, it seems like the C ABI will
be guided based on the performance of WebAssembly code and will likely
not match even what the current wasm-bindgen-compat ABI is today. This
leaves a hole in Rust's expressivity in binding WebAssembly where given
a particular import type, Rust may not be able to import that signature
with an updated C ABI for multi-value.
To fix these issues I had the idea of a new ABI for WebAssembly, one
called `wasm`. The definition of this ABI is "what you write
maps straight to wasm". The goal here is that whatever you write down in
the parameter list or in the return values goes straight into the
function's signature in the WebAssembly file. This special ABI is for
intentionally matching the ABI of an imported function from the
environment or exporting a function with the right signature.
With the addition of a new ABI, this enables rustc to:
* Eventually remove the "wasm-bindgen compat hack". Once this
ABI is stable wasm-bindgen can switch to using it everywhere.
Afterwards the wasm32-unknown-unknown target can have its default ABI
updated to match C.
* Expose the ability to precisely match an ABI signature for a
WebAssembly function, regardless of what the C ABI that clang chooses
turns out to be.
* Continue to evolve the definition of the default C ABI to match what
clang does on all targets, since the purpose of that ABI will be
explicitly matching C rather than generating particular function
imports/exports.
Naturally this is implemented as an unstable feature initially, but it
would be nice for this to get stabilized (if it works) in the near-ish
future to remove the wasm32-unknown-unknown incompatibility with the C
ABI. Doing this, however, requires the feature to be on stable because
wasm-bindgen works with stable Rust.
|
|
|
|
This is step 2 towards fixing #77548.
In the codegen and codegen-units test suites, the `//` comment markers
were kept in order not to affect any source locations. This is because
these tests cannot be automatically `--bless`ed.
|
|
|
|
Detect async visibility wrong order, `async pub`
Partially address #76437.
|
|
async-pub check created a regression for default
|
|
|
|
Redirects `const? async? unsafe? pub` to `pub const? async? unsafe?`.
Fix #76437
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Overview
This commit begins the implementation work for RFC 2945. For more
information, see the rendered RFC [1] and tracking issue [2].
A boolean `unwind` payload is added to the `C`, `System`, `Stdcall`,
and `Thiscall` variants, marking whether unwinding across FFI
boundaries is acceptable. The cases where each of these variants'
`unwind` member is true correspond with the `C-unwind`,
`system-unwind`, `stdcall-unwind`, and `thiscall-unwind` ABI strings
introduced in RFC 2945 [3].
### Feature Gate and Unstable Book
This commit adds a `c_unwind` feature gate for the new ABI strings.
Tests for this feature gate are included in `src/test/ui/c-unwind/`,
which ensure that this feature gate works correctly for each of the
new ABIs.
A new language features entry in the unstable book is added as well.
### Further Work To Be Done
This commit does not proceed to implement the new unwinding ABIs,
and is intentionally scoped specifically to *defining* the ABIs and
their feature flag.
### One Note on Test Churn
This will lead to some test churn, in re-blessing hash tests, as the
deleted comment in `src/librustc_target/spec/abi.rs` mentioned,
because we can no longer guarantee the ordering of the `Abi`
variants.
While this is a downside, this decision was made bearing in mind
that RFC 2945 states the following, in the "Other `unwind` Strings"
section [3]:
> More unwind variants of existing ABI strings may be introduced,
> with the same semantics, without an additional RFC.
Adding a new variant for each of these cases, rather than specifying
a payload for a given ABI, would quickly become untenable, and make
working with the `Abi` enum prone to mistakes.
This approach encodes the unwinding information *into* a given ABI,
to account for the future possibility of other `-unwind` ABI
strings.
### Ignore Directives
`ignore-*` directives are used in two of our `*-unwind` ABI test
cases.
Specifically, the `stdcall-unwind` and `thiscall-unwind` test cases
ignore architectures that do not support `stdcall` and
`thiscall`, respectively.
These directives are cribbed from
`src/test/ui/c-variadic/variadic-ffi-1.rs` for `stdcall`, and
`src/test/ui/extern/extern-thiscall.rs` for `thiscall`.
This would otherwise fail on some targets, see:
https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/fcf697f90206e9c87b39d494f94ab35d976bfc60
### Footnotes
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990
[3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2945-c-unwind-abi.md#other-unwind-abi-strings
|
|
Move rustdoc UI tests into a subdirectory
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73494.
|
|
This also adds a little leeway to the test limit.
|
|
expand: Refactor module loading
This is an accompanying PR to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82399, but they can be landed independently.
See individual commits for more details.
Anyone should be able to review this equally well because all people actually familiar with this code left the project.
|
|
Move some tests to more suitable subdirs
## The results from classifui
(The full results can be found here: https://gist.github.com/JohnTitor/c9e00840990b5e4a8fc562ec3571e427)
- [lint-expr-stmt-attrs-for-early-lints.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint-expr-stmt-attrs-for-early-lints.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: lint (1.566), feature-gates (-0.632), numbers-arithmetic (-0.955)
- [try-block.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/try-block.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: binding (1.385), try-block (-0.097), lint (-0.932)
- [backtrace-debuginfo.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/backtrace-debuginfo.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: macros (1.365), cfg (-0.279), drop (-0.291)
- [issues/issue-3521.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-3521.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/3521)</sup>: consts (1.298), enum (-0.872), in-band-lifetimes (-0.978)
- [impl-bounds-checking.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/impl-bounds-checking.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: traits (1.243), for (-0.999), shadowed (-0.999)
- [issues/issue-17718.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-17718.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/17718)</sup>: binding (1.236), consts (0.315), extern (-0.779)
- [issue-6157.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issue-6157.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/6157)</sup>: regions (1.213), unboxed-closures (-0.285), traits (-0.510)
- [issues/issue-44373.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-44373.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44373)</sup>: consts (1.187), nll (0.427), borrowck (-0.704)
- [nullable-pointer-ffi-compat.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/nullable-pointer-ffi-compat.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: regions (1.184), consts (0.650), traits (-0.571)
- [issues/issue-52992.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-52992.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52992)</sup>: nll (1.132), associated-types (-0.628), parser (-0.893)
- [issues/issue-2330.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-2330.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/2330)</sup>: traits (1.116), directory_ownership (-0.691), compare-method (-0.981)
- [issue-74047.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issue-74047.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74047)</sup>: async-await (1.109), impl-trait (-0.629), resolve (-0.781)
- [issues/issue-33140.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-33140.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33140)</sup>: traits (1.063), coherence (-0.832), codemap_tests (-0.944)
- [issues/issue-28576.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-28576.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28576)</sup>: traits (1.062), associated-types (-0.333), impl-trait (-0.697)
- [issues/issue-7222.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-7222.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/7222)</sup>: binding (1.062), consts (-0.226), numbers-arithmetic (-0.294)
- [tup.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/tup.rs) <sup>unknown</sup>: structs-enums (1.061), threads-sendsync (-0.550), moves (-0.790)
- [issues/issue-15261.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-15261.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15261)</sup>: consts (1.052), where-clauses (-0.833), macros (-0.862)
- [issues/issue-76179.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-76179.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76179)</sup>: associated-types (1.048), process (-0.887), rfc-2457 (-0.984)
- [issues/issue-42344.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-42344.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42344)</sup>: borrowck (1.043), macros (-0.481), specialization (-0.966)
- [issues/issue-18661.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-18661.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/18661)</sup>: unboxed-closures (1.038), mir (-0.648), higher-rank-trait-bounds (-0.688)
- [issues/issue-2633.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/issues/issue-2633.rs) <sup>[issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/2633)</sup>: structs-enums (1.020), functions-closures (-0.722), lint (-0.967)
Some notes:
- If there are related tests (e.g. it's for the same issue), they are moved along with it.
- Moved try-block.rs to the `try-block` dir.
- Moved tup.rs to the `tuple` dir.
- Moved some tests that classified as consts to the `statics` dir, as it seems they have statics actually.
- Skipped backtrace-debuginfo.rs because I think classifui overrates their helper macros.
cc #73494
r? ```@petrochenkov```
|
|
Fix diagnostic suggests adding type `[type error]`
Fixes #79040
### Unresolved questions:
<del>Why does this change output the diagnostic twice (`src/test/ui/79040.rs`)?</del> Thanks `````@oli-obk`````
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also don't push the paths on the stack directly in `fn parse_external_mod`, return them instead.
|
|
Fix #82524.
|
|
Fixes #79040
Unresolved questions:
Why does this change output the diagnostic twice?
Why does the CI fail when the errors are pointed out (UI tests)?
|
|
Add incomplete feature gate for inherent associate types.
Mentored by ``````@oli-obk``````
So far the only change is that instead of giving an automatic error, the following code compiles:
```rust
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
type Bar = isize;
}
```
The backend work to make it actually usable isn't there yet. In particular, this:
```rust
let x : Foo::Bar;
```
will give you:
```sh
error[E0223]: ambiguous associated type
--> /$RUSTC_DIR/src/test/ui/assoc-inherent.rs:15:13
|
LL | let x : Foo::Bar;
| ^^^^^^^^ help: use fully-qualified syntax: `<Foo as Trait>::Bar`
```
|
|
Suggest character encoding is incorrect when encountering random null bytes
This adds a note whenever null bytes are seen at the start of a token unexpectedly, since those tend to come from UTF-16 encoded files without a [BOM](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark) (if a UTF-16 BOM appears it won't be valid UTF-8, but if there is no BOM it be both valid UTF-16 and valid but garbled UTF-8). This approach was suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73979#issuecomment-653976451.
Closes #73979.
|
|
Reword labels on E0308 involving async fn return type
Fix for #80658.
When someone writes code like this:
```rust
fn foo() -> u8 {
async fn async_fn() -> () {}
async_fn()
}
```
And they try to compile it, they will see an error that looks like this:
```bash
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> test.rs:4:5
|
1 | fn foo() -> u8 {
| -- expected `u8` because of return type
2 | async fn async_fn() -> () {}
| -- checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, found opaque type
3 |
4 | async_fn()
| ^^^^^^^^^^ expected `u8`, found opaque type
|
= note: while checking the return type of this `async fn`
= note: expected type `u8`
found opaque type `impl Future`
```
|
|
fix the false 'defined here' messages
Closes #80853.
Take this code:
```rust
struct S;
fn repro_ref(thing: S) {
thing();
}
```
Previously, the error message would be this:
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `S`
--> src/lib.rs:4:5
|
3 | fn repro_ref(thing: S) {
| ----- `S` defined here
4 | thing();
| ^^^^^--
| |
| call expression requires function
error: aborting due to previous error
```
This is incorrect as `S` is not defined in the function arguments, `thing` is defined there. With this change, the following is emitted:
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `S`
--> $DIR/80853.rs:4:5
|
LL | fn repro_ref(thing: S) {
| ----- is of type `S`
LL | thing();
| ^^^^^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: local variable `S` is not a function
error: aborting due to previous error
```
As you can see, this error message points out that `thing` is of type `S` and later in a note, that `S` is not a function. This change does seem like a downside for some error messages. Take this example:
```
LL | struct Empty2;
| -------------- is of type `Empty2`
```
As you can see, the error message shows that the definition of `Empty2` is of type `Empty2`. Although this isn't wrong, it would be more helpful if it would say something like this (which was there previously):
```
LL | struct Empty2;
| -------------- `Empty2` defined here
```
If there is a better way of doing this, where the `Empty2` example would stay the same as without this change, please inform me.
**Update: This is now fixed**
CC `@camelid`
|
|
|
|
|
