| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement a lint to warn about unused macro rules
This implements a new lint to warn about unused macro rules (arms/matchers), similar to the `unused_macros` lint added by #41907 that warns about entire macros.
```rust
macro_rules! unused_empty {
(hello) => { println!("Hello, world!") };
() => { println!("empty") }; //~ ERROR: 1st rule of macro `unused_empty` is never used
}
fn main() {
unused_empty!(hello);
}
```
Builds upon #96149 and #96156.
Fixes #73576
|
|
|
|
|
|
When suggesting to import an item, also suggest changing the path if appropriate
When we don't find an item we search all of them for an appropriate
import and suggest `use`ing it. This is sometimes done for expressions
that have paths with more than one segment. We now also suggest changing
that path to work with the `use`.
Fix #95413
|
|
|
|
When we don't find an item we search all of them for an appropriate
import and suggest `use`ing it. This is sometimes done for expressions
that have paths with more than one segment. We now also suggest changing
that path to work with the `use`.
Fix #95413
|
|
|
|
Point at all the unnecessary trailing `#`.
Better handle interaction with outer attributes when `;` is missing.
Fix #95030.
|
|
|
|
This attempts to bring better error messages to invalid method calls, by applying some heuristics to identify common mistakes.
The algorithm is inspired by Levenshtein distance and longest common sub-sequence. In essence, we treat the types of the function, and the types of the arguments you provided as two "words" and compute the edits to get from one to the other.
We then modify that algorithm to detect 4 cases:
- A function input is missing
- An extra argument was provided
- The type of an argument is straight up invalid
- Two arguments have been swapped
- A subset of the arguments have been shuffled
(We detect the last two as separate cases so that we can detect two swaps, instead of 4 parameters permuted.)
It helps to understand this argument by paying special attention to terminology: "inputs" refers to the inputs being *expected* by the function, and "arguments" refers to what has been provided at the call site.
The basic sketch of the algorithm is as follows:
- Construct a boolean grid, with a row for each argument, and a column for each input. The cell [i, j] is true if the i'th argument could satisfy the j'th input.
- If we find an argument that could satisfy no inputs, provided for an input that can't be satisfied by any other argument, we consider this an "invalid type".
- Extra arguments are those that can't satisfy any input, provided for an input that *could* be satisfied by another argument.
- Missing inputs are inputs that can't be satisfied by any argument, where the provided argument could satisfy another input
- Swapped / Permuted arguments are identified with a cycle detection algorithm.
As each issue is found, we remove the relevant inputs / arguments and check for more issues. If we find no issues, we match up any "valid" arguments, and start again.
Note that there's a lot of extra complexity:
- We try to stay efficient on the happy path, only computing the diagonal until we find a problem, and then filling in the rest of the matrix.
- Closure arguments are wrapped in a tuple and need to be unwrapped
- We need to resolve closure types after the rest, to allow the most specific type constraints
- We need to handle imported C functions that might be variadic in their inputs.
I tried to document a lot of this in comments in the code and keep the naming clear.
|
|
It was used for deduplicating some errors for legacy code which are mostly deduplicated even without that, but at cost of global mutable state, which is not a good tradeoff.
|
|
|
|
Suggest `i += 1` when we see `i++` or `++i`
Closes #83502 (for `i++` and `++i`; `--i` should be covered by #82987, and `i--`
is tricky to handle).
This is a continuation of #83536.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
encountered.
This also registers obligations for the hidden type immediately.
|
|
This reverts commit 6499c5e7fc173a3f55b7a3bd1e6a50e9edef782d, reversing
changes made to 78450d2d602b06d9b94349aaf8cece1a4acaf3a8.
|
|
I changed the test functions to be `pub` rather than called from a
`main` function too, for easier future modification of tests.
|
|
Provide suggestion for missing `>` in a type parameter list
When encountering an inproperly terminated type parameter list, provide
a suggestion to close it after the last non-constraint type parameter
that was successfully parsed.
Fix #94058.
|
|
|
|
When encountering an inproperly terminated type parameter list, provide
a suggestion to close it after the last non-constraint type parameter
that was successfully parsed.
Fix #94058.
|
|
|
|
`run-rustfix` applies all suggestions regardless of their Applicability.
There's a flag, `rustfix-only-machine-applicable`, that does what it
says, but then the produced `.fixed` file would have invalid code from
the suggestions that weren't applied. So, I moved the cases of postfix
increment, in which case multiple suggestions are given, to the
`-notfixed` test, which does not run rustfix.
I also changed the Applicability to Unspecified since MaybeIncorrect
requires that the code be valid, even if it's incorrect.
|
|
This records that the suggestions are mutually-exclusive (i.e., only one
should be applied).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This solves the TODO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of suggesting that the body always replace the last character on the
line, presuming it must be a semicolon, the parser should instead check what
the last character is, and append the body if it is anything else.
Fixes #83104
|
|
suggest removing type ascription in bad parsing position
Not sure how to test this with the non-nightly suggestion. Didn't add a new UI test because it already manifests in an existing UI test.
Fixes #95014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve `unsafe` diagnostic
This fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90880
I didn't use the exact proposed messages though.
|
|
|
|
Change location of where clause on GATs
Closes #89122
~Blocked on lang FCP~
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TaKO8Ki:suggest-removing-semicolon-after-derive-attribute, r=cjgillot
Suggest removing a semicolon after derive attributes
closes #93942
|
