| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokenize emoji as if they were valid identifiers
In the lexer, consider emojis to be valid identifiers and reject
them later to avoid knock down parse errors.
Partially address #86102.
|
|
|
|
Fix #84946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the lexer, consider emojis to be valid identifiers and reject
them later to avoid knock down parse errors.
|
|
Point at source of trait bound obligations in more places
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
We no longer point at associated items (`ImplObligation`), as they didn't
add any user actionable information, they just added noise.
Address part of #89418.
|
|
Fix ICE `#90993`: add missing call to cancel
Fix #90993
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Esteban Kuber <estebank@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Because the parser directory has already reached the 1000 file limit.
|
|
|
|
Elaborate `Future::Output` when printing opaque `impl Future` type
I would love to see the `Output =` type when printing type errors involving opaque `impl Future`.
[Test code](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=a800b481edd31575fbcaf5771a9c3678)
Before (cut relevant part of output):
```
note: while checking the return type of the `async fn`
--> /home/michael/test.rs:5:19
|
5 | async fn bar() -> usize {
| ^^^^^ checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, found opaque type
= note: expected type `usize`
found opaque type `impl Future`
```
After:
```
note: while checking the return type of the `async fn`
--> /home/michael/test.rs:5:19
|
5 | async fn bar() -> usize {
| ^^^^^ checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, found opaque type
= note: expected type `usize`
found opaque type `impl Future<Output = usize>`
```
Note the "found opaque type `impl Future<Output = usize>`" in the new output.
----
Questions:
1. We skip printing the output type when it's a projection, since I have been seeing some types like `impl Future<Output = <[static generator@/home/michael/test.rs:2:11: 2:21] as Generator<ResumeTy>>::Return>` which are not particularly helpful and leak implementation detail.
* Am I able to normalize this type within `rustc_middle::ty::print::pretty`? Alternatively, can we normalize it when creating the diagnostic? Otherwise, I'm fine with skipping it and falling back to the old output.
* Should I suppress any other types? I didn't encounter anything other than this generator projection type.
2. Not sure what the formatting of this should be. Do I include spaces in `Output = `?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address CVE-2021-42574.
|
|
|
|
Some "parenthesis" and "parentheses" fixes
"Parenthesis" is the singular (e.g. one `(` or one `)`) and "parentheses" is the plural (multiple `(` or `)`s) and this is not hard to mix up so here are some fixes for that.
Inspired by #89958
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 7a62f29f3171767090949778ce0f161e930706b9.
|
|
|
|
Try to recover from a `=>` -> `=` or `->` typo in a match arm
Fixes #89396.
|
|
Consistently use 'supertrait'.
A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them
to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other
usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used
in that manner.
|
|
|
|
A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them
to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other
usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used
in that manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix error recovery in format macro parsing
Fixes #88770. Basically, the assumption in the following comment is incorrect:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b69fe57261086e70aea9d5b58819a1794bf7c121/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/format.rs#L167-L172
This is only true in the first iteration of the loop, when [`p.clear_expected_tokens()`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b69fe57261086e70aea9d5b58819a1794bf7c121/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/format.rs#L164) is called. In subsequent iterations, `p.expected_tokens` won't be empty, so `p.expect()` won't actually call `unexpected_try_recover()`:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b69fe57261086e70aea9d5b58819a1794bf7c121/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/mod.rs#L487-L498
Instead, it will call `expect_one_of()`, which _can_ recover and return `Ok()`. This PR handles this case to fix the ICE in #88770.
|
|
"Fix" an overflow in byte position math
r? `@estebank`
help! I fixed the ICE only to brick the diagnostic.
I mean, it was wrong previously (using an already expanded macro span), but it is really bad now XD
|
|
Print a note if a character literal contains a variation selector
Fixes #88684.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recover from `Foo(a: 1, b: 2)`
Detect likely `struct` literal using parentheses as delimiters and emit
targeted suggestion instead of type ascription parse error.
Fix #61326.
|
|
Revert anon union parsing
Revert PR #84571 and #85515, which implemented anonymous union parsing in a manner that broke the context-sensitivity for the `union` keyword and thus broke stable Rust code.
Fix #88583.
|
|
Accept `m!{ .. }.method()` and `m!{ .. }?` statements.
This PR fixes something that I keep running into when using `quote!{}.into()` in a proc macro to convert the `proc_macro2::TokenStream` to a `proc_macro::TokenStream`:
Before:
```
error: expected expression, found `.`
--> src/lib.rs:6:6
|
4 | quote! {
5 | ...
6 | }.into()
| ^ expected expression
```
After:
```
```
(No output, compiles fine.)
---
Context:
For expressions like `{ 1 }` and `if true { 1 } else { 2 }`, we accept them as full statements without a trailing `;`, which means the following is not accepted:
```rust
{ 1 } - 1 // error
```
since that is parsed as two statements: `{ 1 }` and `-1`. Syntactically correct, but the type of `{ 1 }` should be `()` as there is no `;`.
However, for specifically `.` and `?` after the `}`, we do [continue parsing it as an expression](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/13db8440bbbe42870bc828d4ec3e965b38670277/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs#L864-L876):
```rust
{ "abc" }.len(); // ok
```
For braced macro invocations, we do not do this:
```rust
vec![1, 2, 3].len(); // ok
vec!{1, 2, 3}.len(); // error
```
(It parses `vec!{1, 2, 3}` as a full statement, and then complains about `.len()` not being a valid expression.)
This PR changes this to also look for a `.` and `?` after a braced macro invocation. We can be sure the macro is an expression and not a full statement in those cases, since no statement can start with a `.` or `?`.
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #88033 (Add links for primitives in "jump to definition" feature)
- #88722 (Make `UnsafeCell::get_mut` const)
- #88851 (Fix duplicate bounds for const_trait_impl)
- #88859 (interpreter PointerArithmetic: use new Size helper methods)
- #88885 (Fix jump def background)
- #88894 (Improve error message for missing trait in trait impl)
- #88896 (Reduce possibility of flaky tests)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Use smaller spans for some structured suggestions
Use more accurate suggestion spans for
* argument parse error
* fully qualified path
* missing code block type
* numeric casts
|
|
|
