| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Unescaping cleanups
Some code improvements, and some error message improvements.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
r? ````@matklad````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are three kinds of "byte" literals: byte literals, byte string
literals, and raw byte string literals. None are allowed to have
non-ASCII chars in them.
Two `EscapeError` variants exist for when that constraint is violated.
- `NonAsciiCharInByte`: used for byte literals and byte string literals.
- `NonAsciiCharInByteString`: used for raw byte string literals.
As a result, the messages for raw byte string literals use different
wording, without good reason. Also, byte string literals are incorrectly
described as "byte constants" in some error messages.
This commit eliminates `NonAsciiCharInByteString` so the three cases are
handled similarly, and described correctly. The `mode` is enough to
distinguish them.
Note: Some existing error messages mention "byte constants" and some
mention "byte literals". I went with the latter here, because it's a
more correct name, as used by the Reference.
|
|
Fix E0433 No Typo Suggestions
Fixes #48676
Fixes #87791
Fixes #96625
Fixes #95462
Fixes #101637
Follows up PR #72923
Several open issues refer to the problem that E0433 does not suggest typos like other errors normally do. This fix augments the implementation of PR #72923.
**Background**
When the path of a function call, e.g. `Struct::foo()`, involves names that cannot be resolved, there are two errors that could be emitted by the compiler:
- If `Struct` is not found, it is ``E0433: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `Struct` ``.
- If `foo` is not found in `Struct`, it is ``E0599: no function or associated item named `foo` found for struct `Struct` in the current scope``
When a name is used as a type, `e.g. fn foo() -> Struct`, and the name cannot be resolved, it is ``E0412: cannot find type `Struct` in this scope``.
Before #72923, `E0433` does not implement any suggestions, and the PR introduces suggestions for missing `use`s. When a resolution error occurs in the path of a function call, it tries to smart resolve just the type part of the path, e.g. `module::Struct` of a call to `module::Struct::foo()`. However, along with the suggestions, the smart-resolve function will report `E0412` since it only knows that it is a type that we cannot resolve instead of being a part of the path. So, the original implementation swap out `E0412` errors returned by the smart-resolve function with the real `E0433` error, but keeps the "missing `use`" suggestions to be reported to the programmer.
**Issue**
The current implementation only reports if there are "missing `use`" suggestions returned by the smart-resolve function; otherwise, it would fall back the normal reporting, which does not emit suggestions. But the smart-resolve function could also produce typo suggestions, which are omitted currently.
Also, it seems like that not all info has been swapped out when there are missing suggestions. The error message underlining the name in the snippet still says ``not found in this scope``, which is a `E0412` messages, if there are `use` suggestions, but says the normal `use of undeclared type` otherwise.
**Fixes**
This fix swaps out all fields in `Diagnostic` returned by the smart-resolve function except for `suggestions` with the current error, and merges the `suggestions` of the returned error and that of the current error together. If there are `use` suggestions, the error is saved to `use_injection` to be reported at the end; otherwise, the error is emitted immediately as `Resolver::report_error` does.
Some tests are updated to use the correct underlining error messages, and one additional test for typo suggestion is added to the test suite.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
|
|
r=wesleywiser
diagnostics: do not suggest static candidates as traits to import
If it's a static candidate, then it's already implemented. Do not suggest it a second time for implementing.
Partial fix for #102354
|
|
|
|
Name the `impl Trait` in region bound suggestions
Slightly more descriptive message
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add diagnostic for calling a function with the same name with unresolved Macro
Fixes #103112
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macro is not found
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to suggest additional lifetime parameter
``@cjgillot`` This is what I have so far for #100615
|
|
Suggest calling method if fn does not exist
I tried to split this up into two commits, the first where we stash the resolution error until typeck (which causes a bunch of diagnostics changes because the ordering of error messages change), then the second commit is the actual logic that actually implements the suggestion.
I am not in love with the presentation of the suggestion, so I could use some advice for how to format the actual messaging.
r? diagnostics
Fixes #102518
|
|
Suggest `.into()` when all other coercion suggestions fail
Also removes some bogus suggestions because we now short-circuit when offering coercion suggestions(instead of, for example, suggesting every one that could possibly apply)
Fixes #102415
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rageking8:slightly-improve-no-return-for-returning-function-error, r=compiler-errors
Slightly improve no return for returning function error
Fixes #100607
The rationale is that absolute beginners will be slightly confused as to why certain lines of code in a function does not require a semicolon. (I have actually witness a beginner having this confusion). Hence, a slight rationale is added "to return this value", which signals to the user that after removing said semicolon the value is returned resolving that error.
However, if this is not desirable, I welcome any other suggestions. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
instead of suggesting calling it
|
|
|
|
|
|
compiler-errors:assoc-ty-binding-in-assoc-ty-binding, r=cjgillot
Deny associated type bindings within associated type bindings
Fixes #102335
This was made worse by #100865, which unified the way we generate substs for GATs and non-generic associated types. However, the issue was not _caused_ by #100865, evidenced by the test I added for GATs:
```rust
trait T {
type A: S<C<(), i32 = ()> = ()>;
//~^ ERROR associated type bindings are not allowed here
}
trait Q {}
trait S {
type C<T>: Q;
}
fn main() {}
```
^ which passes on beta (where GATs are stable) and presumably ever since GATs support was added to `create_substs_for_associated_item` in astconv.
|
|
Suggest unwrapping `???<T>` if a method cannot be found on it but is present on `T`.
This suggests various ways to get inside wrapper types if the method cannot be found on the wrapper type, but is present on the wrappee.
For this PR, those wrapper types include `Localkey`, `MaybeUninit`, `RefCell`, `RwLock` and `Mutex`.
|
|
MatthewPeterKelly:mpk/add-long-error-message-for-E0311, r=MatthewPeterKelly
Add long description and test for E0311
Adds a long description and unit test for the E0311 compiler error.
Fixes one line-item in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61137.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rename rustc_typeck to rustc_hir_analysis
first part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/529
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
|
