| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use an explicit whitelist for what features are actually stable and can be
enabled.
|
|
references.
|
|
|
|
Once a target feature is enabled for a function that means that it in general
can't be inlined into other functions which don't have that target feature
enabled. This can cause both safety and LLVM issues if we were to actually
inline it, so `#[inline(always)]` both can't be respected and would be an error
if we did so!
Today LLVM doesn't inline functions with different `#[target_feature]`
annotations, but it turns out that if one is tagged with `#[inline(always)]`
it'll override this and cause scary LLVM error to arise!
This commit fixes this issue by forbidding these two attributes to be used in
conjunction with one another.
cc rust-lang-nursery/stdsimd#404
|
|
This commit fixes an ICE in rustc when `#[target_feature]` was applied to items
other than functions due to the way the feature was validated.
|
|
This'll enable running queries that could be cached and overall be more amenable
to the query infastructure.
|
|
This is an implementation of the `#[target_feature]` syntax-related changes of
[RFC 2045][rfc]. Notably two changes have been implemented:
* The new syntax is `#[target_feature(enable = "..")]` instead of
`#[target_feature = "+.."]`. The `enable` key is necessary instead of the `+`
to indicate that a feature is being enabled, and a sub-list is used for
possible expansion in the future. Additionally within this syntax the feature
names being enabled are now whitelisted against a known set of target feature
names that we know about.
* The `#[target_feature]` attribute can only be applied to unsafe functions. It
was decided in the RFC that invoking an instruction possibly not defined for
the current processor is undefined behavior, so to enable this feature for now
it requires an `unsafe` intervention.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2045-target-feature.md
|
