| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
|
LL | pub async fn start(&self) {
| ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL | require_static(async move {
| -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL | &self;
| ----- ...and is captured here
|
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
|
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
| ^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```
Fix #72312.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As suggested via reviewer feedback.
|
|
A global predicate is not guarnatenteed to outlive all regions.
If the predicate involves late-bound regions, then it may fail
to outlive other regions (e.g. `for<'b> &'b bool: 'static` does not
hold)
We now only produce `EvaluatedToOk` when a global predicate has no
late-bound regions - in that case, the ony region that can be present
in the type is 'static
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
Address part of #89418.
|
|
|
|
Fixes incorrect handling of TraitRefs when emitting suggestions.
Closes #90804 , although there were more issues here that were hidden by the thing that caused this ICE.
Underlying problem was that substitutions were being thrown out, which not only leads to an ICE but also incorrect diagnostics. On top of that, in some cases the self types from the root obligations were being mixed in with those from derived obligations.
This makes a couple diagnostics arguable worse ("`B<C>` does not implement `Copy`" instead of "`C` does not implement `Copy`") but the worse diagnostics are at least still correct and that downside is in my opinion clearly outweighed by the benefits of fixing the ICE and unambiguously wrong diagnostics.
|
|
|
|
references
When suggesting references, substitutions were being forgotten and some types were misused. This led to at
least one ICE and other incorrectly emitted diagnostics. This has been fixed; in some cases this leads to
diagnostics changing, and tests have been adjusted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #90101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement coherence checks for negative trait impls
The main purpose of this PR is to be able to [move Error trait to core](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling/issues/3).
This feature is necessary to handle the following from impl on box.
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> { ... }
```
Without having negative traits affect coherence moving the error trait into `core` and moving that `From` impl to `alloc` will cause the from impl to no longer compiler because of a potential future incompatibility. The compiler indicates that `&str` _could_ introduce an `Error` impl in the future, and thus prevents the `From` impl in `alloc` that would cause overlap with `From<E: Error> for Box<dyn Error>`. Adding `impl !Error for &str {}` with the negative trait coherence feature will disable this error by encoding a stability guarantee that `&str` will never implement `Error`, making the `From` impl compile.
We would have this in `alloc`:
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> {} // A
impl<E> From<E> for Box<dyn Error> where E: Error {} // B
```
and this in `core`:
```rust
trait Error {}
impl !Error for &str {}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This PR was built on top of `@yaahc` PR #85764.
Language team proposal: to https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/96
|
|
As you can see in src/test/ui/traits/self-without-lifetime-constraint.stderr
you can get very confusing type names if you don't have this.
Fixes #87763
|
|
|
|
Remove textual span from diagnostic string
This is an unnecessary repetition, as the diagnostic prints the span anyway in the source path right below the message.
I further removed the identification of the node, as that does not give any new information in any of the cases that are changed in tests.
EDIT: also inserted a suggestion that other diagnostics were already emitting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint.
Initial implementation of #89460. Resolves #89190.
Maybe also worth a beta backport if necessary.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
Deny `where` clauses on `auto` traits
Fixes #84075.
|
|
Practice diagnostic message convention
Detected by #89455.
r? ```@estebank```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them
to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other
usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used
in that manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TaKO8Ki:suggest-both-immutable-and-mutable-trait-implementations, r=estebank
Suggest both of immutable and mutable trait implementations
closes #85865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 7
cc #73494
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
Point at argument instead of call for their obligations
When an obligation is introduced by a specific `fn` argument, point at
the argument instead of the `fn` call if the obligation fails to be
fulfilled.
Move the information about pointing at the call argument expression in
an unmet obligation span from the `FulfillmentError` to a new
`ObligationCauseCode`.
When giving an error about an obligation introduced by a function call
that an argument doesn't fulfill, and that argument is a block, add a
span_label pointing at the innermost tail expression.
Current output:
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `x` in this scope
--> f10.rs:4:14
|
4 | Some(x * 2)
| ^ not found in this scope
error[E0277]: expected a `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
--> f10.rs:2:31
|
2 | let p = Some(45).and_then({
| ______________________--------_^
| | |
| | required by a bound introduced by this call
3 | | |x| println!("doubling {}", x);
4 | | Some(x * 2)
| | -----------
5 | | });
| |_____^ expected an `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
|
= help: the trait `FnOnce<({integer},)>` is not implemented for `Option<_>`
```
Previous output:
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `x` in this scope
--> f10.rs:4:14
|
4 | Some(x * 2)
| ^ not found in this scope
error[E0277]: expected a `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
--> f10.rs:2:22
|
2 | let p = Some(45).and_then({
| ^^^^^^^^ expected an `FnOnce<({integer},)>` closure, found `Option<_>`
|
= help: the trait `FnOnce<({integer},)>` is not implemented for `Option<_>`
```
Partially address #27300. Will require rebasing on top of #88546.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move the information about pointing at the call argument expression in
an unmet obligation span from the `FulfillmentError` to a new
`ObligationCauseCode`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use smaller spans for some structured suggestions
Use more accurate suggestion spans for
* argument parse error
* fully qualified path
* missing code block type
* numeric casts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
