| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
detect extra region requirements in impls
The current "compare method" check fails to check for the "region obligations" that accrue in the fulfillment context. This branch switches that code to create a `FnCtxt` so that it can invoke the regionck code. Previous crater runs (I haven't done one with the latest tip) have found some small number of affected crates, so I went ahead and introduced a warning cycle. I will kick off a crater run with this branch shortly.
This is a [breaking-change] because previously unsound code was accepted. The crater runs also revealed some cases where legitimate code was no longer type-checking, so the branch contains one additional (but orthogonal) change. It improves the elaborator so that we elaborate region requirements more thoroughly. In particular, if we know that `&'a T: 'b`, we now deduce that `T: 'b` and `'a: 'b`.
I invested a certain amount of effort in getting a good error message. The error message looks like this:
```
error[E0276]: impl has stricter requirements than trait
--> traits-elaborate-projection-region.rs:33:5
|
21 | fn foo() where T: 'a;
| --------------------- definition of `foo` from trait
...
33 | fn foo() where U: 'a { }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ impl has extra requirement `U: 'a`
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #18937 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/18937>
note: lint level defined here
--> traits-elaborate-projection-region.rs:12:9
|
12 | #![deny(extra_requirement_in_impl)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Obviously the warning only prints if this is a _new_ error (that resulted from the bugfix). But all existing errors that fit this description are updated to follow the general template. In order to get the lint to preserve the span-labels and the error code, I separate out the core `Diagnostic` type (which encapsulates the error code, message, span, and children) from the `DiagnosticBuilder` (which layers on a `Handler` that can be used to report errors). I also extended `add_lint` with an alternative `add_lint_diagnostic` that takes in a full diagnostic (cc @jonathandturner for those changes). This doesn't feel ideal but feels like it's moving in the right direction =).
r? @pnkfelix
cc @arielb1
Fixes #18937
|
|
gets more comprehensive coverage in `ui`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case with different lifetime with spans
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
introing one-time diagnostics: only emit "lint level defined here" once
This is a revised resubmission of PR #34084 (which was closed due to inactivity on account of time constraints on the author's part).
---
We introduce a new `one_time_diagnostics` field on
`rustc::session::Session` to hold a hashset of diagnostic messages we've
set once but don't want to see again (as uniquified by span and message
text), "lint level defined here" being the motivating example dealt with
here.
This is in the matter of #24690.
---
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
Some lint-level attributes (like `bad-style`, or, more dramatically,
`warnings`) can affect more than one lint; it seems fairer to point out
the attribute once for each distinct lint affected. Also, a UI test is
added. This remains in the matter of #24690.
|
|
Fixes #35609.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve error message and snippet for "did you mean `x`"
- Fixes #36164
- Part of #35233
Based on the standalone example https://is.gd/8STXMd posted by @nikomatsakis and using the third formatting option mentioned in #36164 and agreed by @jonathandturner.
Note however this does not address the question of [how to handle an empty or unknown suggestion](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36164#issuecomment-244460024). @nikomatsakis any suggestions on how best to address that part?
|
|
- Fixes #36164
- Part of #35233
- handles unknown fields
- uses UI-style tests
- update all related tests (cfail, ui, incremental)
|
|
squash! Update E0220 error format
Update Error E0220 to new format
|
|
|
|
Fix wording for out-of-crate macro error
This fixes the wording of the note for out-of-crate macro errors to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36469
The previous wording came from older logic in the PR that was replaced without updating the note.
|
|
|
|
When a type parameter shadows a primitive type, the error message
was non obvious. For example, given the file `file.rs`:
```rust
trait Parser<T> {
fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<T>;
}
impl<bool> Parser<bool> for bool {
fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<bool> {
Some(true)
}
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", bool::parse("ok").unwrap_or(false));
}
```
The output was:
```bash
% rustc file.rs
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(true)
| ^^^^ expected type parameter, found bool
|
= note: expected type `bool`
= note: found type `bool`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
We now show extra information about the type:
```bash
% rustc file.rs
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(true)
| ^^^^ expected type parameter, found bool
|
= note: expected type `bool` (type parameter)
= note: found type `bool` (bool)
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Fixes #35030
|
|
|
|
fix span for errors E0537, E0535 & E0536
fix #36182 as part of #35233
|
|
|
|
Updated e0493 to new format (+ bonus).
Part of #35233.
Fixes #35999.
r? @jonathandturner
I'm not satisfied with the bonus part, there has to be an easier way to reach into the `Drop`'s span implementation. I'm all ears. :)
|
|
Update lifetime errors to specifically note temporaries
This PR updates the error message we give in the case of a temporary value not living long enough.
Before:
<img width="497" alt="screen shot 2016-08-31 at 10 02 47 am" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/547158/18138551/27a06794-6f62-11e6-9ee2-bdf8bed75ca7.png">
Now:
<img width="488" alt="screen shot 2016-08-31 at 10 03 01 am" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/547158/18138557/2e5cf322-6f62-11e6-9047-4a78abf3d78c.png">
Specifically, it makes the following changes:
* Detects if a temporary is being used. If so, it changes the labels to mention that a temporary value specifically is in question
* Simplifies wording of the existing labels to focus on lifetimes rather than values being valid
* Changes the help to a note, since the help+span wasn't as helpful (and sometimes more confusing) than just a note.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
|
|
in non-codegen tests. Remove false positive in a test that relied on the exact formatting of an error string and rewrite the sysv64 register allocation test at it was triggering undefined behaviour
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move 'doesn't live long enough' errors to labels
This patch moves the "doesn't live long enough" region-style errors to instead use labels.
An example follows.
Before:
```
error: `x` does not live long enough
--> src/test/compile-fail/send-is-not-static-ensures-scoping.rs:26:18
|
26 | let y = &x;
| ^
|
note: reference must be valid for the block at 23:10...
--> src/test/compile-fail/send-is-not-static-ensures-scoping.rs:23:11
|
23 | fn main() {
| ^
note: ...but borrowed value is only valid for the block suffix following statement 0 at 25:18
--> src/test/compile-fail/send-is-not-static-ensures-scoping.rs:25:19
|
25 | let x = 1;
| ^
```
After:
```
error: `x` does not live long enough
--> src/test/compile-fail/send-is-not-static-ensures-scoping.rs:26:18
|
26 | let y = &x;
| ^ does not live long enough
...
32 | };
| - borrowed value only valid until here
...
35 | }
| - borrowed value must be valid until here
```
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
Rollup of 12 pull requests
- Successful merges: #35346, #35734, #35739, #35740, #35742, #35744, #35749, #35750, #35751, #35756, #35766, #35768
- Failed merges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use UI test to test spans, instead of forced line break
There must be lots more, but these are what I could easily find.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
