| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
Add long explanation for E0549
Helps with #61137
|
|
Replace if-let and while-let with `if let` and `while let`
This pull request replaces if-let and while-let with `if let` and `while let`.
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82205
|
|
In some limited cases, suggest `where` bounds for non-type params
Partially address #81971.
|
|
const_generics: Dont evaluate array length const when handling yet another error
Same ICE as #82009 except triggered by a different error.
cc ``@lcnr``
r? ``@varkor``
|
|
Ensure valid TraitRefs are created for GATs
This fixes `ProjectionTy::trait_ref` to use the correct substs. Places that need all of the substs have been updated to not use `trait_ref`.
r? ````@jackh726````
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 4
cc #81941
|
|
Add diagnostics for specific cases for const/type mismatch err
For now, this adds at least more information so better diagnostics can be emitted for const mismatch errors.
I'm not sure what exactly we want to emit, so I've left notes there temporarily, also to see if this is the right approach
r? ```@lcnr```
cc: ```@estebank```
|
|
|
|
Spell out nested Self type in lint message
Closes #78600
r? `@tmandry`
|
|
Implement reborrow for closure captures
The strategy for captures is detailed here with examples: https://hackmd.io/PzxYMPY4RF-B9iH9uj9GTA
Key points:
- We only need to reborrow a capture in case of move closures.
- If we mutate something via a `&mut` we store it as a `MutBorrow`/`UniqueMuBorrow` of the path containing the `&mut`,
- Similarly, if it's read via `&` ref we just store it as a `ImmBorrow` of the path containing the `&` ref.
- If a path doesn't deref a `&mut`, `&`, then that path is captured by Move.
- If the use of a path results in a move when the closure is called, then that path is truncated before any deref and the truncated path is moved into the closure.
- In the case of non-move closure if a use of a path results in a move, then the path is truncated before any deref and the truncated path is moved into the closure.
Note that the implementation differs a bit from the document to allow for truncated path to be used in the ClosureKind analysis that happens as part of the first capture analysis pass.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/31
r? ````@nikomatsakis````
|
|
Placeholder lifetime error cleanup
- Remove note of trait definition
- Avoid repeating the same self type
- Use original region names when possible
- Use this error kind more often
- Print closure signatures when they are suppose to implement `Fn*` traits
Works towards #57374
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
|
|
Simplify pattern grammar, improve or-pattern diagnostics
This implements the change under FCP in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81415. It allows nested or-patterns to contain a leading `|`, simplifying the [grammar for patterns](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/957/files?short_path=cc629f1#diff-cc629f15712821139bc706c63b3845ab59a008e2a998e08ffad42e3aebcbcbe2).
Along the way, we also improve the diagnostics around a few specially-handled cases, such as using `||` instead of `|`, using or-patterns in fn params, including the leading `|` in the pattern span, etc.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Fix SourceMap::start_point
`start_point` needs to return the *first* character's span, but it would
previously call `find_width_of_character_at_span` which returns the span
of the *last* character. The implementation is now fixed.
Other changes:
- Docs for start_point, end_point, find_width_of_character_at_span
updated
- Minor simplification in find_width_of_character_at_span code
Fixes #81800
|
|
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #79981 (Add 'consider using' message to overflowing_literals)
- #82094 (To digit simplification)
- #82105 (Don't fail to remove files if they are missing)
- #82136 (Fix ICE: Use delay_span_bug for mismatched subst/hir arg)
- #82169 (Document that `assert!` format arguments are evaluated lazily)
- #82174 (Replace File::create and write_all with fs::write)
- #82196 (Add caveat to Path::display() about lossiness)
- #82198 (Use internal iteration in Iterator::is_sorted_by)
- #82204 (Update books)
- #82207 (rustdoc: treat edition 2021 as unstable)
- #82231 (Add long explanation for E0543)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
Add long explanation for E0543
Helps with #61137
|
|
r=sfackler
Document that `assert!` format arguments are evaluated lazily
It can be useful to do some computation in `assert!` format arguments, in order to get better error messages. For example:
```rust
assert!(
some_condition,
"The state is invalid. Details: {}",
expensive_call_to_get_debugging_info(),
);
```
It seems like `assert!` only evaluates the format arguments if the assertion fails, which is useful but doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. This PR documents the behavior and adds some tests.
|
|
Fix ICE: Use delay_span_bug for mismatched subst/hir arg
Fixes #82126.
|
|
Don't fail to remove files if they are missing
In the backend we may want to remove certain temporary files, but in
certain other situations these files might not be produced in the first
place. We don't exactly care about that, and the intent is really that
these files are gone after a certain point in the backend.
Here we unify the backend file removing calls to use `ensure_removed`
which will attempt to delete a file, but will not fail if it does not
exist (anymore).
The tradeoff to this approach is, of course, that we may miss instances
were we are attempting to remove files at wrong paths due to some bug –
compilation would silently succeed but the temporary files would remain
there somewhere.
|
|
Add 'consider using' message to overflowing_literals
Fixes #79744.
Ironically, the `overflowing_literals` handler for binary or hex already
had this message! You would think it would be the other way around :)
cc ```@scottmcm```
|
|
Partially address #81971.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The test case fails with either one error or two errors.
Use a single code generation unit to avoid nondeterminism.
|
|
|
|
validation: fix invalid-fn-ptr error message
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82061 changed the code here to print an `ImmTy` instead of a `ScalarMaybeUninit`; that was an accident. So go back to printing a `ScalarMaybeUninit`.
r? ```@oli-obk```
|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
Add long explanation for E0545
Helps with #61137
|
|
|
|
It can be useful to do some computation in `assert!` format arguments, in order to get better error messages. For example:
```rust
assert!(
some_condition,
"The state is invalid. Details: {}",
expensive_call_to_get_debugging_info(),
);
```
It seems like `assert!` only evaluates the format arguments if the assertion fails, which is useful but doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. This PR documents the behavior and adds some tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Along the way, we also implement a handful of diagnostics improvements
and fixes, particularly with respect to the special handling of `||` in
place of `|` and when there are leading verts in function params, which
don't allow top-level or-patterns anyway.
|
|
const_generics: Fix incorrect ty::ParamEnv::empty() usage
Fixes #80561
Not sure if I should keep the `debug!(..)`s or not but its the second time I've needed them so they sure seem useful lol
cc ``@lcnr``
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
CTFE validation: catch ReadPointerAsBytes and better error
r? ``@oli-obk``
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79690
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1706
|
|
const_generics: Dont evaluate array length const when handling errors
Fixes #79518
Fixes #78246
cc ````@lcnr````
This was ICE'ing because we dont pass in the correct ``ParamEnv`` which meant that there was no ``Self: Foo`` predicate to make ``Self::Assoc`` well formed which caused an ICE when trying to normalize ``Self::Assoc`` in the mir interpreter
r? ````@varkor````
|
|
vandenheuvel:match_exhaustive_diagnostics_regression_test, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add match pattern diagnostics regression test
Closes #72377 by adding a regression test.
This test case fails on stable but now works on beta and nightly. It *should* have worked already for years, the crucial point whether it is mentioned that some uncovered patterns are not explicitly mentioned.
|
|
Suggest to create a new `const` item if the `fn` in the array is a `const fn`
Fixes #73734. If the `fn` in the array repeat expression is a `const fn`, suggest creating a new `const` item. On nightly, suggest creating an inline `const` block. This PR also removes the `suggest_const_in_array_repeat_expressions` as it is no longer necessary.
Example:
```rust
fn main() {
// Should not compile but hint to create a new const item (stable) or an inline const block (nightly)
let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
println!("{:?}", strings);
}
```
Gives this error:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `std::string::String: std::marker::Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:3:32
|
2 | let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `std::marker::Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= note: the `Copy` trait is required because the repeated element will be copied
```
With this change, this is the error message:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:3:32
|
LL | let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= help: moving the function call to a new `const` item will resolve the error
```
|
|
capitalism
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the backend we may want to remove certain temporary files, but in
certain other situations these files might not be produced in the first
place. We don't exactly care about that, and the intent is really that
these files are gone after a certain point in the backend.
Here we unify the backend file removing calls to use `ensure_removed`
which will attempt to delete a file, but will not fail if it does not
exist (anymore).
The tradeoff to this approach is, of course, that we may miss instances
were we are attempting to remove files at wrong paths due to some bug –
compilation would silently succeed but the temporary files would remain
there somewhere.
|
|
fix ice (#82032)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82032
|
|
Add a regression test for #32498
[This](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32498#issuecomment-613626968) test mentioned at issue #32498 now passes. This PR adds this regression test.
|
|
Fixing bad suggestion for `_` in `const` type when a function #81885
Closes #81885
```
error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures
--> $DIR/typeck_type_placeholder_item_help.rs:13:22
|
LL | const TEST4: fn() -> _ = 42;
| ^
| |
| not allowed in type signatures
| help: use type parameters instead: `T`
```
Do not show the suggestion `help: use type parameters instead: T` when `fn`
|
|
Implement the precise analysis pass for lint `disjoint_capture_drop_reorder`
The precision pass for the lint prevents the lint from triggering for a variable (that was previously entirely captured by the closure) if all paths that need Drop starting at root variable have been captured by the closure.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
Visit more targets when validating attributes
This begins to address #80048, allowing for additional validation of attributes.
There are more refactorings that can be done, though I think they should be tackled in additional PRs:
* ICE when a builtin attribute is encountered that is not checked
* Move some of the attr checking done `ast_validation` into `rustc_passes`
* note that this requires a bit of additional refactoring, especially of extern items which currently parse attributes (and thus are a part of the AST) but do not possess attributes in their HIR representation.
* Rename `Target` to `AttributeTarget`
* Refactor attribute validation completely to go through `Visitor::visit_attribute`.
* This would require at a minimum passing `Target` into this method which might be too big of a refactoring to be worth it.
* It's also likely not possible to do all the validation this way as some validation requires knowing what other attributes a target has.
r? `@davidtwco`
|
