| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doc: Prefer https link for wikipedia URLs
A tiny changes.
|
|
Provide better spans for the match arm without tail expression
Resolves #75418.
Applied the same logic in the `if`-`else` type mismatch case.
r? @estebank
|
|
Const floating point bitcasts and classification
Makes the `f32` and `f64` methods described in #72447 and #72505 unstably const.
r? @RalfJung
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
stabilize ptr_offset_from
This stabilizes ptr::offset_from, and closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41079. It also removes the deprecated `wrapping_offset_from`. This function was deprecated 19 days ago and was never stable; given an FCP of 10 days and some waiting time until FCP starts, that leaves at least a month between deprecation and removal which I think is fine for a nightly-only API.
Regarding the open questions in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41079:
* Should offset_from abort instead of panic on ZSTs? -- As far as I know, there is no precedent for such aborts. We could, however, declare this UB. Given that the size is always known statically and the check thus rather cheap, UB seems excessive.
* Should there be more methods like this with different restrictions (to allow nuw/nsw, perhaps) or that return usize (like how isize-taking offset is more conveniently done with usize-taking add these days)? -- No reason to block stabilization on that, we can always add such methods later.
Also nominating the lang team because this exposes an intrinsic.
The stabilized method is best described [by its doc-comment](https://github.com/RalfJung/rust/blob/56d4b2d69abb93e4f0ca79471deca7aaaaeca214/src/libcore/ptr/const_ptr.rs#L227). The documentation forgot to mention the requirement that both pointers must "have the same provenance", aka "be derived from pointers to the same allocation", which I am adding in this PR. This is a precondition that [Miri already implements](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=a3b9d0a07a01321f5202cd99e9613480) and that, should LLVM ever obtain a `psub` operation to subtract pointers, will likely be required for that operation (following the semantics in [this paper](https://people.mpi-sws.org/~jung/twinsem/twinsem.pdf)).
|
|
|
|
Use smaller def span for functions
Currently, the def span of a function encompasses the entire function
signature and body. However, this is usually unnecessarily verbose - when we are
pointing at an entire function in a diagnostic, we almost always want to
point at the signature. The actual contents of the body tends to be
irrelevant to the diagnostic we are emitting, and just takes up
additional screen space.
This commit changes the `def_span` of all function items (freestanding
functions, `impl`-block methods, and `trait`-block methods) to be the
span of the signature. For example, the function
```rust
pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T { val }
```
now has a `def_span` corresponding to `pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T`
(everything before the opening curly brace).
Trait methods without a body have a `def_span` which includes the
trailing semicolon. For example:
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar();
}
```
the function definition `Foo::bar` has a `def_span` of `fn bar();`
This makes our diagnostic output much shorter, and emphasizes
information that is relevant to whatever diagnostic we are reporting.
We continue to use the full span (including the body) in a few of
places:
* MIR building uses the full span when building source scopes.
* 'Outlives suggestions' use the full span to sort the diagnostics being
emitted.
* The `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(enclosing_scope="in this scope")]`
attribute points the entire scope body.
All of these cases work only with local items, so we don't need to
add anything extra to crate metadata.
|
|
Re-land PR #72388: Recursively expand `TokenKind::Interpolated` in `probably_equal_for_proc_macro`
PR #72388 allowed us to preserve the original `TokenStream` in more cases during proc-macro expansion, but had to be reverted due to a large number of regressions (See #72545 and #72622). These regressions fell into two categories
1. Missing handling for `Group`s with `Delimiter::None`, which are inserted during `macro_rules!` expansion (but are lost during stringification and re-parsing). A large number of these regressions were due to `syn` and `proc-macro-hack`, but several crates needed changes to their own proc-macro code.
2. Legitimate hygiene issues that were previously being masked by stringification. Some of these were relatively benign (e.g. [a compiliation error](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-scale-codec/pull/210) caused by misusing `quote_spanned!`). However, two crates had intentionally written unhygenic `macro_rules!` macros, which were able to access identifiers that were not passed as arguments (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72622#issuecomment-636402573).
All but one of the Crater regressions have now been fixed upstream (see https://hackmd.io/ItrXWRaSSquVwoJATPx3PQ?both). The remaining crate (which has a PR pending at https://github.com/sammhicks/face-generator/pull/1) is not on `crates.io`, and is a Yew application that seems unlikely to have any reverse dependencies.
As @petrochenkov mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72545#issuecomment-638632434, not re-landing PR #72388 allows more crates to write unhygenic `macro_rules!` macros, which will eventually stop compiling. Since there is only one Crater regression remaining, since additional crates could write unhygenic `macro_rules!` macros in the time it takes that PR to be merged.
|
|
Currently, the def span of a funtion encompasses the entire function
signature and body. However, this is usually unnecessarily verbose - when we are
pointing at an entire function in a diagnostic, we almost always want to
point at the signature. The actual contents of the body tends to be
irrelevant to the diagnostic we are emitting, and just takes up
additional screen space.
This commit changes the `def_span` of all function items (freestanding
functions, `impl`-block methods, and `trait`-block methods) to be the
span of the signature. For example, the function
```rust
pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T { val }
```
now has a `def_span` corresponding to `pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T`
(everything before the opening curly brace).
Trait methods without a body have a `def_span` which includes the
trailing semicolon. For example:
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar();
}```
the function definition `Foo::bar` has a `def_span` of `fn bar();`
This makes our diagnostic output much shorter, and emphasizes
information that is relevant to whatever diagnostic we are reporting.
We continue to use the full span (including the body) in a few of
places:
* MIR building uses the full span when building source scopes.
* 'Outlives suggestions' use the full span to sort the diagnostics being
emitted.
* The `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(enclosing_scope="in this scope")]`
attribute points the entire scope body.
* The 'unconditional recursion' lint uses the full span to show
additional context for the recursive call.
All of these cases work only with local items, so we don't need to
add anything extra to crate metadata.
|
|
See issue #74616
|
|
Fixes #68430
This is a re-attempt of PR #72388, which was previously reverted due to
a large number of breakages. All of the known breakages should now be
patched upstream.
|
|
|
|
Gate if-let guard feature
Enhanced on #74315. That PR is in crater queue so I don't want to push to it.
Close #74232
cc #51114
|
|
|
|
r=jonas-schievink
Extend normalization in const-eval-query-stack test
Builds with debuginfo have additional information in backtrace.
|
|
Suppress "const" prefix of FnDef constants in MIR dump
I [was asked][1] to suppress the `const` infront of `FnDef`.
I tried to suppress comments for other types, but turned out that `const ()` and `()` is different: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75697#discussion_r473892806
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75670#issuecomment-675574333
|
|
Fix RFC-1014 test
Use two printlns when testing that writing to a closed stdout does not
panic. Otherwise the test is ineffective, since the current implementation
silently ignores the error during first println regardless.
|
|
Capture tokens for Pat used in macro_rules! argument
This extends PR #73293 to handle patterns (Pat). Unlike expressions,
patterns do not support custom attributes, so we only need to capture
tokens during macro_rules! argument parsing.
|
|
|
|
Builds with debuginfo have additional information in backtrace.
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Don't immediately error for cycles during normalization
#73452 meant some normalization cycles could be detected earlier, breaking some code.
This PR makes defers errors for normalization cycles to fulfillment, fixing said code.
Fixes #74868
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
Fix bad printing of const-eval queries
Fixes: #75447
r? @RalfJung
cc @oli-obk
|
|
Enable stack-overflow detection on musl for non-main threads
|
|
|
|
This extends PR #73293 to handle patterns (Pat). Unlike expressions,
patterns do not support custom attributes, so we only need to capture
tokens during macro_rules! argument parsing.
|
|
davidtwco:polymorphization-predicate-simplification-correction, r=eddyb
polymorphize: if any param in a predicate is used, then all are used
Addresses [review](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75518#discussion_r470907646) [comments](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75518#discussion_r470907865) [from](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75518#discussion_r470908188) @eddyb in #75518 that I didn't get to resolve before bors merged.
This PR modifies polymorphization's handling of predicates so that if any generic parameter is used in a predicate then all parameters in that predicate are used.
r? @eddyb
|
|
move const param structural match checks to wfcheck
fixes #75047 fixes #74950
We currently check for structural match violations inside of `type_of`.
As we need to check the array length when checking if `[NonEq; arr_len]` is structural match, we potentially require the variance of an expression. Computing the variance requires `type_of` for all types though, resulting in a cycle error.
r? @varkor @eddyb
|
|
|
|
Doc alias checks: ensure only items appearing in search index can use it
Following the discussion in #73721, I added checks to ensure that only items appearing in the search are allowed to have doc alias.
r? @ollie27
|
|
Don't emit "is not a logical operator" error outside of associative expressions
Avoid showing this error where it doesn't make sense by not assuming
"and" and "or" were intended to mean "&&" and "||" until after we decide
to continue parsing input as an associative expression.
Note that the decision of whether or not to continue parsing input as an
associative expression doesn't actually depend on this assumption.
Fixes #75599
---
First time contributor! Let me know if there are any conventions or policies I should be following that I missed here. Thanks :)
|
|
Fix clashing_extern_declarations stack overflow for recursive types.
Fixes #75512.
Adds a seen set to `structurally_same_type` to avoid recursing indefinitely for types which contain values of the same type through a pointer or reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid showing this error where it doesn't make sense by not assuming
"and" and "or" were intended to mean "&&" and "||" until after we decide
to continue parsing input as an associative expression.
Note that the decision of whether or not to continue parsing input as an
associative expression doesn't actually depend on this assumption.
Fixes #75599
|
|
It has been deny_by_default since 2017 (and warned for some time
before that), so it seems reasonable to promote it.
The specific technical motivation to do this now is to remove a field
from `ParseSess` -- it is a global state, and global state makes
extracting libraries annoying.
Closes #40107
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #75389 (attempt to improve span_label docs)
- #75392 (Add `as_uninit`-like methods to pointer types and unify documentation of `as_ref` methods)
- #75464 (Move to intra doc links for ascii.rs and panic.rs)
- #75578 (Allowing raw ptr dereference in const fn)
- #75613 (Add explanation for `&mut self` method call when expecting `-> Self`)
- #75626 (Clean up E0754 explanation)
- #75629 (Use intra-doc links in `std::env`, `std::alloc` and `std::error`)
- #75634 (Mark x86_64-linux-kernel as *)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
|
|
Add explanation for `&mut self` method call when expecting `-> Self`
When a user tries to use a method as if it returned a new value of the
same type as its receiver, we will emit a type error. Try to detect this
and provide extra explanation that the method modifies the receiver
in-place.
This has confused people in the wild, like in
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/newbie-why-the-commented-line-stops-the-snippet-from-compiling/47322
|
|
Allowing raw ptr dereference in const fn
Reflect on issue #75340
Discussion in previous PR #75425
## Updates
Change `UnsafetyViolationKind::General` to `UnsafetyViolationKind::GeneralAndConstFn` in check_unsafety.rs
Remove `unsafe` in min_const_fn_unsafe_bad.rs
Bless min_const_fn
Add the test case from issue 75340
***
Sorry for the chaos. I messed up and ended up deleting the repo in the last PR. I have to create a new PR for the new repo. I will make a feature branch next time. I will edit the old PR once I receive the commends.
@RalfJung Thank you all for your replies. They are helpful!
r? @oli-obk
|
|
rust_ast::ast => rustc_ast
Rework of #71199 which is a rework #70621
Still working on this but just made the PR to track progress
r? @Dylan-DPC
|
|
davidtwco:issue-60607-preallocate-defid-for-lang-items, r=petrochenkov
Reference lang items during AST lowering
Fixes #60607 and fixes #61019.
This PR introduces `QPath::LangItem` to the HIR and uses it in AST lowering instead of constructing a `hir::Path` from a slice of symbols:
- Credit for much of this work goes to @matthewjasper, I basically just [rebased their earlier work](https://github.com/matthewjasper/rust/commit/a227c706b7809ff07021baf3856b7540d5b57f8a#diff-c0f791ead38d2d02916faaad0f56f41d).
- ~~Changes to Clippy might not be correct, they compile but attempting to run tests through `./x.py` produced failures which appeared spurious, so I didn't run any clippy tests.~~
- Changes to save analysis might not be correct - tests pass but I don't have a lot of confidence in those changes being correct.
- I've used `GenericBounds::LangItemTrait` rather than changing `PolyTraitRef`, as suggested by @matthewjasper [in this comment](https://github.com/matthewjasper/rust/commit/a227c706b7809ff07021baf3856b7540d5b57f8a#r40107992) but I'd prefer that be left for a follow-up.
- I've split things into smaller commits fairly arbitrarily to make the diff easier to review, each commit should compile but might not pass tests until the final commit.
r? @oli-obk
cc @matthewjasper
|
|
|
