| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
stabilize `relaxed_struct_unsize`
closes #81793
the fcp is already complete.
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89826 (Feature gate + make must_not_suspend allow-by-default)
- #89929 (Handling submodule update failures more gracefully from x.py)
- #90333 (rustdoc: remove flicker during page load)
- #90349 (Fix rare ICE during typeck in rustdoc scrape_examples)
- #90398 (Document `doc(keyword)` unstable attribute)
- #90441 (Test that promotion follows references when looking for drop)
- #90450 (Remove `rustc_hir::hir_id::HirIdVec`)
- #90452 (Remove unnecessary `Option` from `promote_candidate` return type)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
[master] Fix CVE-2021-42574
This PR implements new lints to mitigate the impact of [CVE-2021-42574], caused by the presence of bidirectional-override Unicode codepoints in the compiled source code. [See the advisory][advisory] for more information about the vulnerability.
The changes in this PR will be released in tomorrow's nightly release.
[CVE-2021-42574]: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-42574
[advisory]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/11/01/cve-2021-42574.html
|
|
Test that promotion follows references when looking for drop
Noticed that this wasn't covered by any of existing tests.
The const checking and const qualification, which currently shares the
implementation with promotion, will likely need a different behaviour
here (see issue #90193).
|
|
This lint is not yet ready for stable use, primarily due to false positives in edge
cases; we want to test it out more before stabilizing.
|
|
Noticed that this wasn't covered by any of existing tests.
The const checking and const qualification, which currently shares the
implementation with promotion, will likely need a different behaviour
here (see issue #90193).
|
|
Add #[must_use] to remaining std functions (A-N)
I've run out of compelling reasons to group functions together across crates so I'm just going to go module-by-module. This is half of the remaining items from the `std` crate, from A-N.
I added these functions myself. Clippy predictably ignored the `mut` ones, but I don't know why the rest weren't flagged. Check them closely, please? Maybe I overlooked good reasons.
```rust
std::backtrace::Backtrace const fn disabled() -> Backtrace;
std::backtrace::Backtrace<'a> fn frames(&'a self) -> &'a [BacktraceFrame];
std::collections::hash_map::RawOccupiedEntryMut<'a, K, V> fn key_mut(&mut self) -> &mut K;
std::collections::hash_map::RawOccupiedEntryMut<'a, K, V> fn get_mut(&mut self) -> &mut V;
std::collections::hash_map::RawOccupiedEntryMut<'a, K, V> fn get_key_value(&mut self) -> (&K, &V);
std::collections::hash_map::RawOccupiedEntryMut<'a, K, V> fn get_key_value_mut(&mut self) -> (&mut K, &mut V);
std::env fn var_os<K: AsRef<OsStr>>(key: K) -> Option<OsString>;
std::env fn split_paths<T: AsRef<OsStr> + ?Sized>(unparsed: &T) -> SplitPaths<'_>;
std::io::Error fn get_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut (dyn error::Error + Send + Sync + 'static)>;
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
Restructure std::rt (part 2)
A couple more cleanups on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89011
Blocked on #89011
|
|
Address CVE-2021-42574.
|
|
Add #[must_use] to mem/ptr functions
There's a lot of low-level / unsafe stuff here. Are there legit use cases for ignoring any of these return values?
* No regressions in `./x.py test --stage 1 library/std src/tools/clippy`.
* One regression in `./x.py test --stage 1 src/test/ui`. Fixed.
* I am unable to run `./x.py doc` on my machine so I'll need to wait for the CI to verify doctests pass. I eyeballed all the adjacent tests and they all look okay.
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skipping verbose diagnostic suggestions when calling .as_ref() on type not implementing AsRef
Addresses #89806
Skipping suggestions when calling `.as_ref()` for types that do not implement the `AsRef` trait.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
Use `is_global` in `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
This manifistated in #90195 with compiler being unable to keep
one candidate for a trait impl, if where is a global impl and more
than one trait bound in the where clause.
Before #87280 `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` was using
`TypeFoldable::is_global()` that was enough to discard the two
`ParamCandidate`s. But #87280 changed it to use
`TypeFoldable::is_known_global()` instead, which is pessimistic, so
now the compiler drops the global impl instead (because
`is_known_global` is not sure) and then can't decide between the
two `ParamCandidate`s.
Switching it to use `is_global` again solves the issue.
Fixes #90195.
|
|
Improve and test cross-crate hygiene
- Decode the parent expansion for traits and enums in `rustc_resolve`, this was already being used for resolution in typeck
- Avoid suggesting importing names with def-site hygiene, since it's often not useful
- Add more tests
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
|
|
Prevent type flags assertions being thrown in default_anon_const_substs if errors occurred
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90364
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88997
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
Restrict liveness of mutable borrow of inner infcx in ConstInferUnifier::consts
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89304
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
Unify titles in rustdoc book doc attributes chapter
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90339.
I wasn't able to find out where the link to the titles was used so let's see if the CI fails. :)
r? ``@camelid``
|
|
|
|
'AsRef' trait
|
|
|
|
Use type based qualification for unions
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
Fixes #90268.
`@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=ecstatic-morse,oli-obk
Consider indirect mutation during const qualification dataflow
Previously a local would be qualified if either one of two separate data
flow computations indicated so. First determined if a local could
contain the qualif, but ignored any forms of indirect mutation. Second
determined if a local could be mutably borrowed (and so indirectly
mutated), but which in turn ignored the qualif.
The end result was incorrect because the effect of indirect mutation was
effectivelly ignored in the all but the final stage of computation.
In the new implementation the indirect mutation is directly incorporated
into the qualif data flow. The local variable becomes immediately
qualified once it is mutably borrowed and borrowed place type can
contain the qualif.
In general we will now reject additional programs, program that were
prevously unintentionally accepted.
There are also some cases which are now accepted but were previously
rejected, because previous implementation didn't consider whether
borrowed place could have the qualif under the consideration.
Fixes #90124.
r? `@ecstatic-morse`
|
|
|
|
Fixes incorrect handling of ADT's drop requirements
Fixes #90024 and a bunch of duplicates.
The main issue was just that the contract of `NeedsDropTypes::adt_components` was inconsistent; the list of types it might return were the generic parameters themselves or the fields of the ADT, depending on the nature of the drop impl. This meant that the caller could not determine whether a `.subst()` call was still needed on those types; it called `.subst()` in all cases, and this led to ICEs when the returned types were the generic params.
First contribution of more than a few lines, so feedback definitely appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
|
|
Add regression test for #75961
Closes #75961.
Closes #21203.
|
|
Add hint for people missing `TryFrom`, `TryInto`, `FromIterator` import pre-2021
Adds a hint anytime a `TryFrom`, `TryInto`, `FromIterator` import is suggested noting that these traits are automatically imported in Edition 2021.
|
|
r=Aaron1011
fix: inner attribute followed by outer attribute causing ICE
Fixes #87936, #88938, and #89971.
This removes the assertion that validates that there are no outer attributes following inner attributes. Where the inner attribute is invalid you get an actual error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properly check `target_features` not to trigger an assertion
Fixes #89875
I think it should be a condition instead of an assertion to check if it's a register as it's possible that `reg` is a register class.
Also, this isn't related to the issue directly, but `is_target_supported` doesn't check `target_features` attributes. Is there any way to check it on rustc_codegen_llvm?
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
|
|
|
|
getting inconsistent output between local and CI.
|
|
is suggested
|
|
other test
|
|
Add regression test for #87258
Closes #87258.
|
|
Add regression test for issue 90164
Closes #90164 (previously fixed by #90181)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edit error messages for `rustc_resolve::AmbiguityKind` variants
Edit the language of the ambiguity descriptions for E0659. These strings now appear as notes.
Closes #79717.
|
|
Previously a local would be qualified if either one of two separate data
flow computations indicated so. First determined if a local could
contain the qualif, but ignored any forms of indirect mutation. Second
determined if a local could be mutably borrowed (and so indirectly
mutated), but which in turn ignored the qualif.
The end result was incorrect because the effect of indirect mutation was
effectivelly ignored in the all but the final stage of computation.
In the new implementation the indirect mutation is directly incorporated
into the qualif data flow. The local variable becomes immediately
qualified once it is mutably borrowed and borrowed place type can
contain the qualif.
In general we will now reject additional programs, program that were
prevously unintentionally accepted.
There are also some cases which are now accepted but were previously
rejected, because previous implementation didn't consider whether
borrowed place could have the qualif under the consideration.
|
|
Make thiscall abi on unsupported platforms a hard error
As suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42202#issuecomment-950205016, this PR makes use of the `thiscall` abi on unsupported a hard error instead of a lint.
|
|
fix(rustc_typeck): report function argument errors on matching type
Fixes #90101
|
|
|